【新唐人2011年8月13日讯】“郭美美事件”所引发的风波还未平息，“中国红十字会”近日再次遭遇信任危机。媒体曝光：在天津市红十字会推行的“博爱一日捐”活动中，存在“强捐”现象。大陆法律专家认为，这种“强捐”没有法律依据，涉嫌违法。分析人士指出，“中国红十字会”是在亵渎国际“红十字会”的宗旨，实际应该称为“中共红十字会”。
台湾《中时电子报》报导，天津市红十字会在推出的“博爱一日捐”活动中，强制要求市内各级机关工作人员捐出部分工资，虽然号称自愿捐款，但有企业员工抱怨自己被“强捐”了，就是说，捐款直接从工资中被扣除。也有网友反映，连看门的人员都被要求捐了30元。
天津市北辰区红十字会发布一份文件，要求这项活动在7月31号前展开，对像是北辰区各级机关、团体、企事业单位内，有工资收入的在职人员和有效益的企业。文件要求企业捐出1天的收益，各级党政机关、事业单位工作人员捐出1天的工资。
北辰区红十字会还对具体的捐款金额提出了要求，在“捐款数额参考标准”中规定：局级捐400元，处级捐300元、科级捐230元，甚至对高级工、初级工的捐款金额也规定得一清二楚。
天津某单位职工在“博爱一日捐”活动中，被单位扣了工资。他对《南方都市报》抱怨说：“我被强捐了，这郭美美事件还没过，红十字会就扣工资当捐款啊？”
陕西律师张鉴康：“红十字会就是一个慈善组织吧，款项应该是来自于公民和企业的认捐，你强制的话，是没有法律依据的。”
事实上，除天津市外，山西、河北等地，每年也都搞“博爱一日捐”，山东则是“慈心一日捐”。大陆各地红十字会推出的各种募捐活动名目繁多，数不胜数。
就在6、7月份，安徽省亳（音: Bó）州市居然推出了所谓“福彩一日捐”——“动员职工捐出一天的工资购买福利彩票”，这项募捐活动也因为涉及劝捐、强捐，而饱受民众和媒体的批评。
大陆作家陈永苗在接受《新唐人》采访时表示，按照国际红十字会的宗旨，红十字会应该起到护士的作用，而不是像“中国红十字会”这样来参与商业垄断的运作。
陈永苗：“像报纸，现在《人民日报》的摊派一样，是强行摊派，强行捐助，强制性的。这已经严重偏离了国际红十字会的宗旨，建议国际红十字会，应该把中国红十字会开除掉，否则这不是对他们宗旨的极大的污蔑吗？”
内蒙古五原县红十字会在今年（2011年）的募捐活动中，除了定下捐款标准外，更是直接规定：“捐款人数不得少于总人数的98%”。
海外民运人士、中国民主党福建委员会主席王传忠，他通过亲身经历指出，在美国根本没有可能发生这种事情，在中国，红十字会是中共控制的一个组织，而所有的企事业单位、团体都必须服从中共的统治才能生存，所以，才会有“强捐”存在。
王传忠：“中国红十字会，这个红十字会呢，前面是中国两个字，其实质就是中共的红十字会，而不是属于国际上那种红十字会的性质。”
在此之前，沸沸扬扬的“郭美美事件”让中国红十字会成为各界舆论的焦点，并一度陷入信任危机。迫于公众要求账目公开的压力，7月31号，中国红十字总会发布捐赠信息查询平台，但平台查询到的“青海玉树地震”捐赠数据却被严重缩水。比如，查询到的李连杰“壹基金”对玉树地震的捐款只有25430元，而实际捐款金额多达263万元。
新唐人记者常春、李谦、孙宁采访报导。
Red Cross: Forced Donations In Tianjin
The ‘Guo Meimei incident’ storm is not over
and the Chinese Red Cross has once again suffered a blow to its credibility.
The Red Cross in Tianjin initiated the ‘Fraternity Donation Day,’
forcing people to make donations.
Mainland legal experts believe the forced donations
have no legal basis and are most probably illegal.
Analysts point out that the Chinese Red Cross is desecrating
the International Red Cross’ mission, and should be called the “CCP (Chinese Communist Party) Red Cross.”
The online version of Taiwan’s China Times reported that
the Tianjin Red Cross Fraternity Donation Day event,
forced workers at all levels of the municipal government
to donate a portion of their wages.
Although the contributions were referred to as “voluntary,”
the employees complained that they were forced to donate,
that is, contributions were deducted directly from their wages.
A netizen said, “Even the janitor was asked to donate!”
The Tianjin Beichen District Red Cross issued a document,
requiring that its donation event start before the end of July,
so as to include employees in all levels of government agencies,
groups, enterprises, and institutions that are making profits.
The document required that these enterprises donate
one day’s worth of income, and employees in public and
government organizations would need to donate
one day’s worth of wages.
The Beichen Red Cross also set specific requirements on the
amount of donations that one had to make.
According to the ‘standard level of contributions,’ rule
bureau-level workers have to donate RMB 400 (US$62.59),
while division-level workers have to donate RMB 300 (US$47.00),
and section-level have to donate RMB 230 (US$36.00).
There’s also set requirements for senior and primary workers.
A worker in Tianjin had his wages deducted at the Fraternity
Donation Day event.
He complained to the Southern City Newspaper, saying, “I was forced to donate! Guo Meimei’s case is not over.
The Red Cross dares to collect donations from my wages!”
Shaanxi lawyer, Stephen Kang:
“The Red Cross is a charitable organization; money should come from citizens and businesses
according to their will.
Forcing people to do otherwise is illegal.”
In addition to Tianjin, places in Shanxi and Hebei Province
all hold a Love Donation Day event every year.
Shandong Province holds a Compassion Donation Day event.
The mainland Red Cross holds a slew of fundraising campaigns.
In June and July, Bozhou City in Anhui Province even launched
the so-called Lottery Donation Day event, asking workers to donate one day’s worth of wages to buy welfare lottery.
This forced donations, fund-raising activity was also criticized.
ChenYongmiao, a mainland writer, told New Tang Dynasty TV
that according to the International Red Cross’ mission,
its mission is to serve as nurses and doctors for the needy,
rather than operate commercial-run monopolies, like the Chinese Red Cross.
Chen Yongmiao: “Like a newspaper, such as the People’s Daily,
there is forced distribution and forced contributions.
Thus, the Chinese Red Cross has severely deviated
from the International Red Cross’ original mission.
I suggest that the International Red Cross abolish the
Chinese Red Cross, otherwise it’ll tarnish the Red Cross’ name.”
In Wuyuan County in Inner Mongolia,
the Red Cross set up requirements for fund-raising activities in 2011,
and even states
“The number of people who donate should be no less than 98%."
Chairman, Wang Chuanzhong, of Democratic Party in Fujian,
points out from his personal experience, that such things would never occur in the US.
In China, the Red Cross is under the control of the CCP,
and all enterprises, institutions, and groups must obey every CCP rule to survive.
Thus, forced donations are rampant.
Wang Chuanzhong: “The Chinese Red Cross, has the word
‘Chinese’ in front of the words ‘Red Cross,’ however,
its nature is actually the CCP Red Cross, not
the International Red Cross."
The Guo Meimei case had made the Chinese Red Cross the center of attention in the public’s eye, thus,
people no longer trust it as they have lost all confidence in it.
Forced by public opinion on July 31, the Chinese Red Cross
set up a donation information search platform in which donation
amounts were open to the public in Yushu City,
in Qinghai Province, but officials underreported the figures.
For example, a query into Jet Li’s One Foundation contributions
to Yushu Province are listed as only RMB 25,430 (US$4,000), but the actual amount was RMB 2.63 million (US$408,000).
NTD reporters Chang Chun, Li Qian and Sun Ning
