【新唐人2011年4月8日讯】自多国联军空袭利比亚军事目标以来，卡扎菲独裁政权遭到重创。与此同时，中共官方媒体以大量虚假歪曲的报导，高调抨击联军的军事干预，为屠杀民众的卡扎菲辩护，引发中国网民的不满。中国四大门户网站之一《网易》开设利比亚专题，罕见的公开反驳中共喉舌的论调。
由北约主导的多国联军执行联合国安理会设立禁飞区的决议，持续对利比亚进行军事干预。北约指挥官范乌姆4月5号表示，联军空袭已经摧毁了利比亚政府军30%的力量。
独裁狂人卡扎菲6号致信美国总统欧巴马，要求北约停止空袭。美国国务卿希拉里驳回表示，卡扎菲必须下台、流亡国外﹔并要求卡扎菲的军队停火，从他们武力夺取的城市撤离。
6号，利比亚反对派组成的过渡政府成员会见了美国特使史蒂文斯，希望美国承认过渡政府。目前，利比亚过渡政府已得到了欧盟、法国、意大利和卡塔尔的承认。
《路透社》引述利比亚受伤民众的话说，卡扎菲部队对平民进行屠杀。国际刑事法庭检察官欧堪波5号表示，在5月4号向安理会提交调查报告后，可能会在数周后申请对卡扎菲的逮捕令。
李大勇 全球退党服务中心执行主任：“像利比亚卡扎菲这次公开的用坦克、飞机去轰炸那些民众，联合国有个决议，这个决议在我看来，是联合国有史以来最重要的一个决议之一，它明确了把人权高于主权的概念进行了一个具体的实践。就是说，如果你国内真正出现了反人类这种行为的话，那么国际社会会干预的。”
连日来，《新华社》、《人民日报》、《环球时报》等中共喉舌，铺天盖地谴责多国联军的军事干预。
陈破空 时事评论家：“中南海发表在《人民日报》上这篇文章的标题：‘空袭利比亚，令人不安的军事行动’。令谁不安？当然是中南海自己。这个不是依靠民意和选票、而是依靠恐吓和镇压而强行把持国家的政权，其内心深处，从来就充满虚弱、恐惧。”
这场中共喉舌掀起的论战，引发国内网民的热烈讨论。
门户网站《网易》开设了“利比亚专题”，其中一个专题为“是否存在石油战争”，以多篇文章分析论证，最后得出结论：“西方世界并非是冲着利比亚的石油而向卡扎菲开刀。”
《网易》的专题以两次海湾战争为例，指出美国“出兵为了石油”，这样的论调曾在“阴谋论”和“民族主义”的情绪煽动下发酵。而事实上，在伊拉克战争之后，“中国石油天然气集团”公司却成为伊拉克石油输出的最大赢家。
《网易》的另一个专题为“该不该空袭利比亚”，文章内容强调：在联合国安理会的授权下，由欧美和阿拉伯国家组成的盟军，对利比亚的军事介入，是正当和合法的。
《网易》的专题指出了“不干涉内政”和“滥用主权原则”的危险性，并且对于“人权高于主权”给予肯定。专题最后表示，无论用什么手段，保护利比亚平民免遭独裁者的蹂躏，比维护一个屡屡作恶的政权重要得多。
新唐人记者李元翰、周天综合报导。
=====
163.com Refutes Gadhafi Support
After the multinational coalition started the air raids,
Gadhafi’s dictatorship has been badly hit.
Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) official media
are fabricating a lot of false reports,
attacking the coalition’s military intervention,
and defending Gadhafi who massacred his people.
CCP’s media has upset the Chinese netizens.
163.com, one of the four major portals in China,
opened up a special web page for the Libyan war.
This is a rare public rebuttal against CCP’s media.
The NATO-led multinational coalition carried out
UN Security Council’s no-fly zone resolution.
NATO’s commander Mark van Uhm said on April 5,
the coalition air strikes have destroyed
30% of the Libyan regime’s army power.
Dictator Gadhafi wrote to President Obama,
on April 6, demanding NATO to stop the air strikes.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton rejected it and
said that Gaddafi must step down and go into exile.
She also asked Gadhafi’s military to cease fire and
evacuate from the cities they have seized by force.
On April 6, Libya’s transitional government,
set up by opposition groups, met U.S. envoy
Chris Stevens, hoping to have the U.S.’s recognition
of its legitimacy. Currently, it has been recognized
by France, the European Union, Italy and Qatar.
Reuters quoted some injured civilians in Libya
that Gadhafi’s forces have massacred civilians.
International Criminal Court Prosecutor,
Moreno-Ocampo said, that after submitting
an investigation report to the UN, he might apply
for Gadhafi’s arrest warrant in a few weeks.
Li Dayong, Global Quitting CCP Service Center
Director: “Gadhafi openly uses tanks and planes
to bomb people. This UN resolution is among
the most important ones, as it showed
that human rights are above sovereignty.
That is, if in a country such anti-humane acts occur,
then the international community will intervene."
Recently, CCP’s mouthpieces such as Xinhua,
People’s Daily and Global Times overwhelmingly
condemn the coalition’s military intervention.
Commentator Chen Po Kong:"CCP’s central
government published on People’s Daily:
‘Air Raids in Libya are Disturbing Military Actions’.
Disturbing to whom? Of course to the central
government. It doesn’t rely on public opinions
or votes, but on intimidation and suppression
of people. Its heart is filled with weakness and fear."
The debates set off by CCP mouthpieces
have triggered heated discussions among netizens.
News portal 163.com set up ’Libyan Special Topics’.
The conclusion of topic ’Is there really a war for oil?’
is: ’The West doesn’t attack Gadhafi for Libya’s oil.’
163.com used two examples from the Gulf War,
to explain that the argument of ’U.S. attacks for oil’
is driven by conspiracy theories and ’nationalism’.
In fact, after the Iraqi war,
CCP gained most from the Iraq’s oil output.
In 163.com’s topic ’Should Libya be air stricken?’
stressed that based on UN Security Council’ orders,
the military intervention of the coalition army
composed of U.S., European and Arab troops
is justified and legitimate.
163.com pointed towards the danger of applying
the concepts of “non-interference in internal affairs"
and “abuse the principle of sovereignty", and
affirms that “human rights are above sovereignty".
By all means, civilian protection is more important
than maintaining stability of an illegitimate regime.
NTD reporters Li Yuanhan and Zhou Tian.
