【新唐人2015年01月16日訊】香港特首梁振英14號宣讀自「雨傘運動」後的首份施政報告，批評「香港大學」學生會刊物《學苑》主張香港「自立自決」，是錯誤的「港獨」。評論認為，梁振英這是「上綱上線」，以學生支持「港獨」為藉口「搞批鬥」，打壓言論，並向北京效忠。
1月14號，梁振英施政報告中點名狠批「香港大學」的兩份書刊，去年2月《學苑》出版的專題「香港民族命運自決」，以及去年9月份編印的「香港民族論」中，主張香港「尋找一條自立自決的出路」。梁振英聲稱對《學苑》和佔中學生領袖的「錯誤主張」，「不能不警惕」。
當天下午梁振英還在記者會上，當著眾多記者的面，翻閱《學苑》和《民族論》，他不滿文章中「講到香港獨立」，「民主回歸論死亡，香港民主獨立應運而生，是將香港獨立訴求和爭取民主連成一線……」等內容。
梁振英認為，文章中「有關主張香港獨立的言論，不是學術研究」，而是涉及香港關鍵的憲制問題，所以「港獨」問題需要警惕。
香港自由撰稿人張成覺認為，梁振英這是「上綱上線」，誤導世人。
香港自由撰稿人張成覺：「梁振英在施政報告裡，他這一點是很含糊的，有一點容易誤導市民，誤導群眾，那麼再說回《學苑》這個文章，他是主張香港105自立和自決，是說香港人本身的利益，應該是香港市民自行去維護和判斷，不應該由外面的勢力來越俎代庖，跟港獨完全兩個概念。」
香港學聯秘書長周永康批評，梁振英對《學苑》的言論是「搞批鬥」，對學生刊物疑神疑鬼，「再次證明梁振英思想極端……連大學校院的學生言論都想殺無赦」。周永康說自己曾提出「香港問題，香港解決」的口號，只是捍衛香港人認同的「一國兩制」的運行方式。
曾擔任 2013－2014年度《學苑》總編輯的梁繼平，回應說，梁振英故意給港大學生會扣「港獨」帽子，是踐踏「言論自由」的舉動。梁繼平說，《學苑》刊登的文章，只是希望引發學生思考，呼籲港人擺脫奴性。
2013－2014年度香港大學學生會《學苑》總編輯梁繼平：004「很多文章都很有理據，或者深入分析香港自己的歷史、文化，香港人的公民身份，或者政治意識等等，去塑造我們近年少見的，相對有主體性論述的香港人的身份。」
梁繼平表示，現在香港年輕人，有「港獨」意識的並不多，學生只是要求撤回人大8.31決定和公民提名等，希望爭取民主公義制度，並非錯誤主張。
學民思潮召集人黃之鋒說，學民思潮無意推動「港獨」，《學苑》的言論只供社會討論。黃之鋒質疑梁振英的做法是要以言入罪，他表示，特區政府應該反思，為何愈來愈多人對特區及中央政府不信任，令「港獨」意識抬頭。
70年代曾擔任《學苑》副總編輯的程翔指出，在任何一個社會裏，年輕人的思想都是比較前衛的，梁振英不管讚不讚同他們的觀點，都不應該在施政報告中批判他們。
《學苑》原副總編輯程翔：「成年人如果不接受這種東西的話，你跟他辯論，你跟他勸導，而不是去扼殺他，如果一個社會對最前衛的思想都給扼殺，那社會就沒有生機，沒有活力。所以我覺得梁振英這樣做是扼殺香港年輕一代勇於探索的精神，我覺得是非常不對的。」
張成覺分析，「雨傘運動」的核心議題是特首普選，梁振英在施政報告中，沒有反思學生「爭普選」背後的政治問題，而是碰觸「港獨」這個敏感議題，出乎很多人的意料。
張成覺：455「梁振英作為中共欽點的特區行政長官，他在佔中之後，目前這個情況下，他對於學院這個刊物不能視而不見的，或者是西環的中聯辦授意讓他這麼辦，或者是他利益熏心，覺得這裡面對他的地位構成威脅，他一定要撇清這個關係。」
張成覺分析，北京向來以有香港人支持「港獨」為藉口，強硬推行對港政策，梁振英這次提「港獨」，可以看作是撇清自己，討好北京的一種宣誓。
採訪編輯/李韻
Leung Chun-ying’s Criticism of Hong Kong Student Magazine
Similar to Denouncement During Cultural Revolution.
On Jan. 14, Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying read his first
administrative report since the “Umbrella Movement."
He criticized University of Hong Kong student publication
“Undergrad" for its support of Hong Kong autonomy.
It was labeled as wrongful support of “Independence."
Commentators think Leung exaggerated students’ ideas.
He was trying to find excuses to suppress students
using “Independence of Hong Kong “.
Leung was also trying to show his allegiance to Beijing.
Leung Chun-ying severely criticized two magazines
from the University of Hong Kong.
In Feb. 2014, Undergrad published a special report titled
Hong Kong Nation’s Self Determination.
Another article was in Hong Kong Nation Discussion
published in Sep. 2014.
This advocates Hong Kong “finding a way out of
self-sustaining and self-determination."
Leung claimed “we must be vigilant" to the “wrong ideology"
of Undergrad and leaders of the Occupy Central movement.
At the press conference, Leung browsed through Undergrad
and Hong Kong Nation Discussion watched by reporters.
He was dissatisfied with the articles saying “talking about
Hong Kong independence"; and
“The death of democracy and the birth of of
Hong Kong Independence."
Leung Chun-ying believes that “Remarks of Hong Kong
independence were not just academic speech".
They touched key constitutional issues, so they need to be
on alert over “Hong Kong Independence".
Hong Kong free-lance writer Andrei Chang thinks Leung was
labeling names of student actions and misleading people.
Andrei Chang: “There is one confusing point in
Leung Chun-ying’s report, which is misleading.
Taking the article in Undergrad, Hong Kong’s self-sustaining
and self-determination were about Hong Kong citizens.
The people should decide what they want,
not the outside power.
It is totally different from Hong Kong Independence."
2013 – 2014 Undergrad General Editor Brian Leung
said that Leung Chun-ying was trying to label the names
of “Hong Kong Independence" to students. He is damaging
freedom of speech.
Brian Leung said that articles on Undergrad were to make
people think.
They were appealing to Hong Kong people to cleanse
their nature of being slaves.
Hong Kong Federation Secretary General Alex Chou
criticized Mr Leung’s remarks on Undergrad .
He said they were similar to the denouncement during
the Cultural Revolution.
“It confirms Leung’s extreme ideas…
curb students’ freedom of speech."
Alex Chou said he once raised the slogan “Hong Kong
Issues Resolved by Hong Kong People".
This is the “One Country, Two System"
acknowledged by Hong Kong people.
Brian Leung, “Many articles come from in-depth analysis of
Hong Kong’s history, culture, people and political awareness.
They are to shape the Hong Kong identification,
which was rare in recent years."
Brian Leung expressed that not many young men in Hong
Kong have the thought of “Hong Kong’s Independence".
Students just want the 8.31 decision by
the NPR to be withdrawn.
They want to have a democratic system. That is not wrong.
Scholarism founder Joshua Wong said Scholarism has
no intention to promote Hong Kong Independence.
The remards on Undergrad are only for people to discuss.
Wong questioned Leung’s way of
labeling crimes over speech.
He said the SAR government should think over why
so many people mistrust the central government.
Why is there a start of Hong Kong Independence?
Ching Cheong, who was deputy editor of Undergrad in the
70’s pointed said young peoples’ ideas are more avant-garde.
Whether Mr. Leung agrees or disagrees with them, he
should not criticize them in his administrative report.
Ching Cheong, “If adults do not accept these kind of ideas,
they can discuss or guide them, not strangle them.
If the most avant-garde ideas of a society are suppressed,
then there is no life in the society.
I think it is very wrong that Leung was strangling
young peoples’ spirit of change."
Andrei Chang analyzed that the core issue of the “Umbrella
Movement" is the universal suffrage of the Chief Executive.
Leung Chun-ying did not reflect political issues behind the
students’ fight over elections in his report.
He touched upon the sensitive topic of “Hong Kong
Independence". This was out of many peoples’ expectations.
Andrei Chang: “Mr Leung is the Chief Executive appointed
by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
After the Occupy Central movement, he cannot ignore
these magazines.
It is either he was told to do so, or he felt it would threaten
his positions and he must distance themselves from this."
Andrei Chang thinks Beijing has always used the excuse
of “Hong Kong independence" to push its policies.
Leung Chun-ying mentioned “Hong Kong independence"
to distance himself from it and get favor from Beijing.
Interview & Edit/Li Yun
