【新唐人2014年08月28日訊】剛剛成立一個多月的中國網路媒體《澎湃新聞網》，因屢爆中共貪官「猛料」，日前遭到中共「社會科學院」一家研究中心的點名批評，指稱《澎湃網》「不守底線」，要給予「糾正偏頗」。而評論認為，中共黨內爭奪話語權，已經到了短兵相接、持刀見紅的地步了。
8月25號，「社科院」下屬的「國家文化安全與意識形態建設研究中心」，在「微博」發佈貼文說：「針對《澎湃新聞網》開通以來的一系列不當做法，中央領導和有關部門及時提出嚴厲批評予以糾偏，並明確要求包括新媒體在內的所有新聞媒體都要『一個標準、亮明底色、築牢底線』，不允許任何單位搞特殊！ 」
8月18號，中共現任領導人習近平曾強調，要著力打造一批「形態多樣、手段先進的新型主流媒體」，《澎湃新聞網》被民間視為其中代表之一。
而「社科院」下屬機關的帖文一出，立即引來大批網友圍觀，不少人追問﹕《澎湃新聞網》「開通以來的一系列不當做法」，具體是指甚麼？而且是哪位「中央領導和有關部門」及時提出嚴厲批評？
據了解，《澎湃新聞網》是由上海《東方早報》編採團隊運作，自7月22號正式上線以來，因經常揭露中共貪官受查的內幕而走紅。網頁中更有所謂「打虎記」，報導大、小「老虎」下臺的新聞。中共「網路安全和信息化領導小組辦公室」主任魯煒，還曾前往《澎湃新聞網》辦公室視察。
旅美原大陸歷史學教授劉因全認為，這個事件說明習近平陣營和江派的鬥爭，已經到了短兵相接、持刀見紅的地步了。
旅美原大陸歷史學教授劉因全：「社科院的這些人反對《澎湃網》這樣做，我相信這是中共黨內這些反對反貪的這些人。換句話說，就是那些貪污腐敗分子。說的更具體一點，就是以江澤民為代表的那些貪污腐敗勢力，他們進行反撲。」
據了解，爆料《澎湃網》被批評的是「社科院」一研究院原黨委書記侯惠勒，他一向鼓吹「反普世價值」。
而中共政治局內，主管意識形態和宣傳領域的政治局常委劉雲山，與「社科院」關係密切。中紀委駐「社科院」紀檢組組長張英偉，被認為是劉雲山的嫡系部下。兩人共事多年，關係密切。
劉因全：「劉雲山他是一個江派的人物，他也是一個腐敗非常嚴重的人物，他掌控的新聞媒體基本上在這裏和習近平、王岐山這一派來唱反調，我們看到他不斷的來製造一些麻煩，我相信習近平、王岐山他們這一些人要把反腐敗進行到底的話，必須要清除劉雲山的勢力」。
6月10號，張英偉聲稱，「社科院」存在四大意識形態問題，已經遭到所謂「境外勢力滲透」。這些極左言論，曾引起外界關注。而7月10號，中共喉舌引用「社科院」副院長趙勝軒的話說，「社科院」 ，「凡出現政治違紀問題、不適宜擔任現職的，一律予以免職。」
被視為中南海智囊的政治學者吳稼祥向媒體表示，中共黨內派系鬥爭異常激烈，這是「社科院」設計陷害以習近平為首的「改革派」，讓「改革派」背上「走資產階級自由化」的罪名。
中國資深法學專家趙遠明分析認為，下一個將要被削權者，很可能是劉雲山，而宣傳部門的控制權，將會被習近平陣營掌控。
中國資深法學專家趙遠明：「從前面可以看出來，習近平是打算﹕第一，要把媒體多樣化，你這樣的話，媒體多樣化，劉雲山想控制也很難完全控制得了，第二的話，媒體多樣化，打破這個傳統的方式和傳統的聲音，要有新的因素參加進來，而且媒體多樣化，有很多新人進來之後，會有更多新的思維，新的思想。」
不過，《澎湃新聞網》也沒能走出「站在中共立場進行選擇性報導」的怪圈。25號，《澎湃》選擇性的刊登《經濟學人》的封面特稿譯文，把不利於中共宣傳口徑的文字整句刪除，引來眾多網民抨擊。
採訪編輯/李韻 後製/陳建銘
CCP Internally Fights Freedom Of Expression
The website of China-based The Paper launched a month ago.
Because it consistently exposes corrupt officials, recently,
it was criticized by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
(CASS).
They claimed The Paper doesn’t maintain a bottom line
and should be disciplined.
Commentators say that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
fight against rights of expression has intensified.
On Aug. 25, a CASS research center posted on their Weibo
(microblog): “Regarding The Paper’s series of improper
practices, the central leaders and relevant departments
timely issued serious criticism to correct it.
The criticism clearly requested all media follow the rule
of ‘one standard, open background and build
a strong bottom line.’
No exception allowed for any work unit.”
On Aug. 18, Chinese leader Xi Jinping asked that a new-style
media group with “diverse forms and advanced methods”
be formed.
The Paper’s website was regarded as one
of the examples cited by public.
Once CASS’s posts were published, discussion
among netizens was immediately triggered.
Many people said, “What does ‘The Paper’s series
of improper practices’ refer to”?
Whom is the “central leader and relevant departments”?
Sources say that The Paper is operated
by Shanghai’s Oriental Morning Post.
Since it launched on July 22, it became popular
for its exposure of corrupt officials’ inside stories.
It has a column called, “Story of Fighting Tiger,” which
reports dismissals of small and big “Tigers.”
Lu Wei, an officer in the central office, had been
to The Paper’s office for inspection work.
Liu Yinquan, US-based historian in Chinese history
says that this issue indicates that the struggle between
Xi Jinping and the Jiang faction has reached
its final moments.
Liu Yinquan: “I think CASS people who were against
The Paper are those who resisted Xi’s anti-corruption.
In other words, it was corrupt officials who
are against The Paper.
Furthermore, it was Jiang Zemin’s
corrupt officials’ counter attack.”
Sources say that Hou Huile, former Party secretary
of the CASS research center who publicized the news
regarding the criticism of the Paper.
He has always promoted anti-universal values.”
In the CCP’s Politburo, Liu Yunshan, who is in charge
of propaganda, had close links with CASS.
Zhang Yingwei, team leader of central disciplinary
department in CASS was said to be an ally of Liu Yunshan.
The both worked together for several years,
they were very close.
Liu Yinquan: “Liu Yunshan was in Jiang’s faction.
He is also very corrupt.
The media he controls are basically against
Xi Jinping and Wang Qishan.
We observed that he consistently created troubles.
I believe if Xi and Wang want to carry out anti-corruption
to the end, Liu Yunshan’s faction must be cleared out.”
On June 10, Zhang Yingwei claimed that CASS has four
major ideological problems and have been
“infiltrated by foreign forces.”
These extreme leftists have aroused public concern.
On July 10, CCP mouthpiece cited Zhao Shengxuan,
deputy president of CASS, who said that “those who have
violated disciplines and are unsuitable to currently
hold post will step down.”
Wu Jiaxiang, political scholar who was regarded as
a think tank of Zhongnanhai, says that the CCP
internal struggle is intensifying quite a bit,
and it is CASS that framed reformers led by Xi Jinping.
It is in order to let reformers take the “walking toward
bourgeoisie liberalization” blame.
Chinese senior legal expert Zhao Yuanming analyzes
that the next official to be purged could be Liu Yunshan.
The propaganda department will likely
be taken over by Xi Jinping.
Zhao Yuanming: “We observe what Xi Jinping intents to do:
First, diversifying media, in this case, even if Liu Yunshan
wants to control it, it will be difficult to control all.
Second, diversified media can break up
the traditional method and voices of propaganda.
There will be some new elements add in, and newcomers
will join and bring many new ideals and thoughts.”
However, The Paper still can’t excape from cycle
of “standing by the CCP’s side doing selective reporting.”
On Aug. 25, The Paper re-produced the Economists’ editorial.
The Paper deleted sentences that were not good for the CCP,
provoking many netizens’ criticisms.
Interview & Edit/LiYun Post-Production/Chen Jianming
