【新唐人2014年03月19日訊】克里米亞經過所謂的公投後，脫離烏克蘭，投入了俄羅斯的懷抱，卻遭到世界各國的制裁和譴責。不過中共外交部，一方面說尊重每個國家的領土主權，同時又呼籲國際社會冷靜，這種互為矛盾的做法，引起了公眾討論。外界認為，如果在中國公投的話，恐怕絕大部分人希望脫離中共，最好中南海自己畫圈獨立為好。
3月16號，克里米亞舉行全民公投，克里米亞官員宣佈，在參加公投的選民中，將近97%的人投票支持克里米亞脫離烏克蘭，加入俄羅斯。但烏克蘭臨時總理亞採紐克表示，這次克里米亞的公投，是在俄羅斯的槍口下進行的「馬戲表演」。
17號，歐盟宣佈對21名俄羅斯和烏克蘭官員實施旅行禁令，並凍結他們的海外財產。這些官員被認為在克里米亞「脫烏入俄」的過程中，扮演了重要角色。
而美國白宮則發表聲明說，克里米亞公投違反烏克蘭憲法，是在「俄羅斯軍事干預帶來的暴力與恐嚇威脅之下」進行的公投，國際社會不會予以承認。白宮還說，一個國家通過武力侵佔他國領土，而讓國際社會對此袖手旁觀的時代已經一去不復返。美國呼籲國際社會繼續譴責俄方的行為，採取「切實措施」令其付出代價，同時共同維護烏克蘭的主權與領土完整。
18號，中共外交部再次呼籲在烏克蘭問題上保持克制，宣稱國際社會應該發揮建設性作用，緩和緊張局勢。
外交部發言人洪磊說：「中國一貫尊重每個國家的領土主權。」
不過，在聯合國表決「克里米亞公投非法」的提案時，北京卻投了棄權票。
旅澳中國問題專家趙遠明：「不管是烏克蘭還是俄羅斯，北京都不想得罪，尤其俄羅斯，北京需要跟俄羅斯在政治上、經濟上、軍事上結盟。但是它一聽這公投也是心驚膽跳的，這個公投如果在中國出現的話，共產黨肯定就倒，大家會投它的棄權票或反對票。」
大陸《權利運動發起人胡軍：「現在廣東、上海、雲南、貴州，哪個省都不願意和中共中南海的一幫流氓摻和在一起，最好畫個圈，中南海單獨獨立，他們自己在那個圈裡搞他們的馬列，我們是中國黃種人，不是馬列，華人和馬列沒有任何關係。」
中國歷史上出現很多全盛時期，唐朝太宗年間，萬國歸順，明朝永樂年間，萬王來朝。評論指出，如果在那個時候選擇公投，不知道有多少國家和民族願意選擇中國。大陸《權利運動》網站發起人胡軍說，現在中國人都清醒了，選擇脫離中共不等於脫離中國。
《美國之音》評論說，在如何對烏克蘭危機做出官方回應的問題上，中國一直在走鋼絲。
評論認為，俄羅斯通過派遣軍隊來敦促克里米亞舉行公投，觸及到了中國的兩個核心外交原則，那就是不干預別國事務和保護領土完整。
美國蒙大拿大學the University of Montana退休史學教授史蒂芬•萊文( Steven Levine)，一生都在研究中國問題以及中國的外交關係，史蒂文向《新唐人》指出，通過公民投票來決定一個國家的領土歸屬，會讓北京聯想到，新疆、西藏和台灣等地區的去向。
美國蒙大拿大學退休史學教授史蒂芬•萊文：「當然支持在一片國土裡投票獨立是違背北京政府的長遠利益的，因為就像我指出的一樣，西藏，新疆，台灣都會出現這種情況。 對台灣來說，如果沒有來自北京的壓力， 多數台灣人會要想投票成為一個獨立的國家，這是會立即出現的問題。」
中共奪權以來，一直把西藏和新疆當作頭等大事來抓，近年來，由於中共對西藏文化的破壞，並企圖用馬列主義給僧人洗腦，導致僧人自焚事件時有發生。
採訪編輯/劉惠 後製/鍾元
Chinese Communist Party Non-Committal Over Crimean Referendum to Leave Ukraine.
The recent referendum in Crimea was reported
to have resulted for a majority vote to join Russia.
This move has faced international
sanctions and condemnation.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Foreign Ministry
has spoken about respecting territorial sovereignty.
It has appealed for calm in the international community,
which has triggered much discussion amongst the public.
Observers believe that if a referendum was held in
China, most people would want to remove the CCP.
They would want to leave the CCP government
compound in Zhongnanhai standing isolated.
On March 16, a referendum was held in Crimea.
Crimean officials announced that nearly 97%
of voters who participated voted in favor of
Crimea leaving Ukraine, and to join Russia.
Ukraine interim Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk said
that the Crimean referendum was conducted under the
muzzle of Russian gun point, and was merely a show.
On March 17, European Union (EU) announced
a travel ban on 21 Russian and Ukrainian
officials, and a freeze on their overseas assets.
These officials are considered to have played key roles
in Crimea “leaving Ukraine and joining Russian.”
The White House says the referendum
is contrary to Ukraine’s constitution.
It further stated that the international community
won’t recognize the results of a vote held under
“threats of violence and intimidation from a Russian
military intervention that violates international law.”
“We are long past the time when the international
community will stand quietly by while one
country forcibly seizes the territory of another.
We call on all members of the international
community to continue to condemn such actions.
To take concrete steps to impose costs, and to
stand together in support of the Ukrainian people.
To support Ukraine＇s territorial integrity and sovereignty.
On March 18, China＇s Foreign Ministry reiterated
its call to act with restraint on the Ukraine issue.
It stated that the international community should
take constructive steps to ease current tensions.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said:
“China has always respected the independence,
sovereignty and territorial integrity of other countries.”
However, Beijing abstained from the UN
resolution declaring Crimea＇s vote invalid.
Zhao Yuanming, China expert: “China does
not want to offend either the Ukraine or Russia.
Beijing especially needs Russia as a political,
economic and military alliance partner.
The CCP is also very afraid of the concept of referendum.
If a referendum was held in China, the CCP would collapse.”
Hu Jun, founder, China Human Rights Movement:
“Now, in Guangdong, Shanghai, Yunnan, Guizhou,
none of these provinces is willing to mix with the CCP.
It is best to draw a circle around
Zhongnanhai and let it be independent.
They can set up Marxism within this circle.
We are Chinese, not Marxists or Leninists.
We Chinese people have nothing to do with these things.”
Chinese history has many peak eras of culture.
During the Taizong Years in the Tang Dynasty,
and Yongle Years of the Ming Dynasty, kings
from all over the world would travel to China.
If a referendum was held at that time, how
many countries and nations would choose China?
Hu Jun comments that Chinese people are now
waking up, and choose to denounce the CCP.
Voice of America commented that the CCP has
been walking on a tightrope with the question of
how to officially respond to the crisis in the Ukraine.
Commentators think that Russia sending troops
into Crimea to urge a referendum touched
the core of China’s two diplomatic principles.
These are to not interfere with other countries＇
affairs and protection of territorial integrity.
Steven Levine, a retired University of Montana professor,
has closely studied China and China’s foreign relations.
Steven told NTD that ownership of territory
by referendum will make Beijing think about
the future of Xinjiang, Tibet and Taiwan.
Steven Levine: “It goes against the Beijing regime＇s
interests to be seen supporting a vote for independence.
This is because of the issue of Tibet
and Xinjiang, and Taiwan for that matter.
There is no oppression from Beijing upon Taiwan, so people
in Taiwan would likely vote to be an independent country.
This is a more immediate question.
Since the CCP seized power, Tibet
and Xinjiang have been top priorities.
In recent years, the CCP destroying Tibetan culture
and attempting to brainwash its people with Marxism
Leninism has led to many self-immolation prote
Interview & Edit/LiuHui Post-Production/ZhongYuan
