【新唐人2013年12月28日訊】中共的「三公消費」，多年來一直備受公眾的詬病和質疑。然而，近年來，隨著高校腐敗黑幕被頻頻曝光，人們開始將關注的視線轉向高校的「三公」消費，卻發現，高校的「三公消費」亂象比起一些政府部門有過之而無不及。
據《新京報》報導，今年年初，社會公益人士，「上海交通大學」研究生雷闖，向113所高校發出信息公開申請信， 要求公開2012年「三公」經費支出情況。但到了年底，只有11所高校公開了「三公經費」信息。
此外，有19所沒有經過雷闖申請的學校也公開了「三公消費」。經過整理，這30所高校的「三公消費」排行榜日前正式出爐。其中，「浙江大學」以1107萬8000元的消費金額位居榜首，「天津大學」緊跟其後:「三公支出」527萬；「廣東湛江師範學院」排名第三:花費516萬元。而排名末位的「廣東體育學院」公開的「三公消費」居然為0元，引發了社會廣泛質疑。
原「首都師範大學教育科學學院」副教授李元華：「這個肯定是它自己在自欺欺人，不可能！就是真正報的數字，那些人實際上也是有所掩飾的。它很有可能把一些公款吃喝，作為學術經費去走賬了，而實在走不了帳那些東西，或者在賬面上它覺得說不過去的，它才真正用於消費，那個要說是0的話，肯定是一種欺騙。」
據雷闖向媒體介紹，在他向113所高校發出信息公開申請信後，陸續收到了41所高校的回覆。其中「清華、北大」等28所學校表示，需要等到財務決算經相關部門批複後，再公開信息，但實際上，最終這些高校也沒有將「三公」消費信息公開。
而有4所高校，乾脆明確拒絕公開，分別是﹕首都師範大學、上海師範大學、華東理工大學和西南大學。
李元華：「我想可能是，它知道這個『三公消費』有很多是不合理的消費。就是政府把這個錢撥到學校裡邊，或者從名義來講上是教育經費，但實際上她沒直接投入到教育裡邊，而被一些掌控教育的中共官員給花費掉了，用於那種不是正當的、跟教育有關的花費上了，所以它不願把這個數字公布出來。」
據了解，在「三公」經費的限制上，當局沒有對高校等事業單位作出任何明確規定。因此，當前中國高校「三公」消費的公開和監管，只能靠高校的所謂「自律」，而沒有相關監管部門和法律的約束。這就使得高校「三公」消費更加腐敗和亂象叢生，假賬、爛帳一堆。
調查顯示，90.6%的受訪者直言當前高校「三公」消費亂象嚴重，其中84.0%的受訪者認為「非常嚴重」。
浙江大學商學研究院院長 李志文：「其實現在中國出了蠻大的問題，你要抓，其實任何人都可以坐牢。起碼我在浙大我知道，很多帳，要報它不讓報，它們的帳不可能清，全部一批爛帳。我想，不只是在浙大報帳，所有的中國大學報賬，是很痛苦、很痛苦的事情。0就是逼良為娼，這個我是有親身體驗。」
近期，繼「四川大學」副校長安小予、「浙江大學」副校長褚健先後被抓，大陸很多媒體認為，這是當局要進行高校反腐的信號，但民間對此卻絲毫不抱希望。
李元華：「如果它是想從高校下手，也是想撈錢一些民心。因為今天的教育問題可能比較敏感，大家花了很多錢送子女去上學，最後畢業以後，教育質量不好，整個就業也有困難，可能民怨比較大，那麼它整治一、兩個高校的所謂的『貪官』，來撈取一些民心，也有可能從這個角度去做，但是這種做法解決不了中共腐敗和高校腐敗的問題。」
原「首都師範大學教育科學學院」副教授李元華指出，因為整個中共政權的腐敗，高校只是政府的一個小部門，高校的腐敗就是當今社會的縮影，如果整個社會不變的話，高校也不可能獨立於社會之外。覆巢之下，焉有完卵。
採訪編輯/張天宇 後製/蕭宇
30 Universities Publicize “the Three Public Consumptions”;
Zhejiang University is Highest
The Chinese Communit Party (CCP) “three public
consumptions” have always been questioned by the public.
In recent years, as corruptions at universities have been
revealed, people started to focus on the “three public
consumptions” of universities, which is found to be even
more chaotic than in some government departments.
According to the Beijing News, social welfare person and
Shanghai Jiaotong University graduate student, Lei Chuang
sent letters to 113 universities, requesting them to make
public their “three public consumptions” of 2012.
But by the end of 2012, only 11 of the universities had
published the “three public consumptions” information.
There are 19 universities that Lei didn’t sent letters to
who also published their “three public consumptions”.
A ranking list of the “three public consumptions” of
the 30 universities was recently published.
Zhejiang University is number one with consumption
of 11.078 million yuan.
Tianjin University follows with 5.27 million yuan. Zhanjiang
Normal University is the third with 5.16 million yuan.
The last one is Guangdong Institute of Sport with 0 yuan
of “three public consumptions” raising widespread questions.
Li Yuanhua, former associate professor at Department of
Science of Education at Capital Normal University: “It must
be a lie.It’s impossible! Even other schools that reported the
numbers may in fact be hiding something.
They may have reported the money they spend on food and
drink as academic expenses.
Only the expenses that can not be mentioned publicly
are reported as public consumptions.
Talking about the 0 yuan of consumption,
it must be a lie.”
Lei told media that after he sent the letters to the 113
universities, he received replies from 41 universities.
28 of them included Tsinghua University and Peking University
implying they need to get their financial accounts permitted
before publicizing the information. But in fact, none of those
universities has published it since.
4 of the universities clearly refused to reveal the consumption,
including Capital Normal University, Shanghai Normal
University, East China University and Southwestern University.
Li Yuanhua: “I think it’s likely that they know that a lot of the
expenses in their ‘three public consumptions’ are not right.
The government gives funding to the universities, which is
nominally academic expenses, but it’s not spent on education.
Instead, it’s spent by the CCP official who is in charge of
education, on something improper but related to education.
So they don’t want to publish it.”
The CCP hasn’t made any clear regulations on how
universities and institutes should spend the “three public
consumptions”.
China’s universities are currently relying on self-discipline to
manage and open their “three public consumptions”, without
supervision from other departments or law.
It leads to corruptions and chaotic situations in universities
with a lot of false accounts and bad debts.
A survey shows that 90.6% of respondents think the chaos
of “three public consumptions” in universities now is serious.
Among them 84% think the issue is “very serious”.
Li Zhiwen, dean of Graduate School of Business at Zhejiang
University: “China is actually has big problems now.
If you really investigate, anyone could be in prison.
I know that at least at Zhejiang University, there are a lot
of accounts that are not allowed to be reported.
The accounts can’t be cleared. They are all bad debts.
Not just for Zhejiang University, but for all the universities in
China, it is a very miserable thing to report the expense.
I personally had experience of doing so.”
Recently, Xiaoyu vice president of Sichuan University and
Zhu Jian vice president of Zhejiang University were arrested.
A lot of mainland media say it’s a signal of anti-corruption
campaign in universities by the CCP.
But civil society doesn’t have much hope in it.
Li Yuanhua: “If the CCP wants to [fight against corruption]
in the universities, it just wants to gain support from people.
The education issue today is very sensitive.
People spend a lot of money on education of their children.
The quality of education is not good, and careers are bad.
So there are a lot of complaints from the civil society.
So [the CCP] punishes some so called “corrupt officials”
in a couple schools to gain some support from people.
It is possible. But it can’t solve the issue of corruption
in the CCP and universities.”
Li Yuanhua also pointed out that because of the corruption
of the CCP regime, universities are only a small department
of the government, and the corruption in universities is not a
miniature of the society today.
If the whole society doesn’t change, the universities can’t
change, as there’s “no complete egg in a overturned nest”.
Interview & Edit/Zhang Tianyu Post-Production/XiaoYu
