【新唐人2013年06月06日訊】中共國家主席習近平於5月31號出訪美洲4國，才剛剛離開4天，東北三省連起三把大火，引起外界猜測，各種「陰謀論」也不脛而走。香港媒體發表評論文章指出，這不僅是天災，更是人禍，習近平出國訪問，後院的這三把大火，是否會延燒官場？請看報導：
自5月31號起，東北三省連發3場大火，先是國營企業「中國儲備糧管理總公司」黑龍江林甸直屬庫發生火災，79個儲糧囤表面過火，燒掉了4.7萬噸存糧，損失一億元左右；緊接著，6月2號，「中石油遼寧大連石化分公司」又發生兩個油罐爆炸；隔天，3號，吉林德惠市一家禽業屠宰場再發生嚴重火災，傷亡人數達幾百人。
響應今年剛升任中紀委書記的王岐山「反腐打虎」，中紀委中央巡視組下到各地調查期間，「中儲糧」就發生火災，引發各界質疑：是否是「中儲糧」掩蓋虧空，人為縱火？
時事評論員邢天行：「在這個關鍵的時刻，尤其是中儲糧，這個糧食問題儲備，在以前就…其實不斷的曝光過，就是它的那個糧庫的糧都空了，那麼在這個時候，因為它要巡查的時候，又發生這樣的大火災，是不是掩蓋糧庫空虛這種真情，這個應該是有道理的一種推論了。」
日前，中共喉舌媒體對「中儲糧」大火損失的報導，出現戲劇性變化。一天之內，火災損失統計，縮水近30倍。
大陸《國際公關》雜誌原常務副主編丁來峰在微博質疑：「中儲糧」大火。第一次說損失過億，第二次說損失近億，第三次說損失8,000萬，第四次說損失300萬。敢不敢更進一步：「中儲糧」大火燒出了幾億GDP！
一連3場事故，都發生在東北，又都在習近平出國期間發生，於是各種「陰謀論」不脛而走。
香港《明報》發表文章分析，「中儲糧」和「中石油」相繼出事，有人想像是針對國企的陰謀，就如前年的動車事故，最終擊垮鐵道部。
不過，也有人聯想到吉林的省委書記王儒林、省長巴音朝魯和黑龍江的省長陸昊，他們同為團派出身，而連番事故則表明對團派不利。
時事評論員邢天行表示，如果這事發生在國外，不會引起大眾這樣的猜疑。那麼，為甚麼在中國，大家會認為是「陰謀論」呢？
時事評論員邢天行：「這是跟中共根本體制有關係，第一個它向來搞陰謀，它的政權是不透明的，它權力鬥爭之間它是掩蓋的，最後披露出來的真相又讓國人非常吃驚，所以當這些事情發生的時候，了解中共黑幕這些人，他自然的就會去想這又是在搞甚麼陰謀？」
文章也指出，撇開「陰謀論」不計，這幾場嚴重意外，確實是對大陸工業安全「監管不力」的連串警號。
邢天行：「監管不力造成的火災，但是監管問題是中國國內一直以來長期的問題，所有的食品安全等等其他的都跟監管有關，監管為甚麼不力，那麼，我想大家都知道，是跟中共這個體制直接有關係，就是它自查自管。」
《大紀元》分析說，像中石油、中石化這樣的中國大型國企，都被江澤民、周永康、曾慶紅等家族掌控，他們掏空了國家的利益和民眾創造的財富。
中國時事評論員夏小強認為：「中儲糧」用一場糧倉大火，來迎接中央巡視組的到來，顯示了中共高層的嚴重分裂態勢，包括江派在內的所有中共利益集團，都拒絕改變和放棄手中的利益。因此，用任何體制內的手段來解決腐敗問題，都會遇到利益集團魚死網破的抵抗，甚至不惜以破壞整個中國社會的穩定和中共的統治為代價。
採訪編輯/常春 後製/黎安安
Xi Jinping Visits Abroad, Deadly Fires at Home
The Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP),
Xi Jinping began his inter-America’s four countries’tour on 31st May.
Four days upon departure, three fire incidents
occurred in three Northeastern Provinces at home.
It triggered speculation of a “conspiracy theory".
Media in Hong Kong commented that these were
not only natural disasters, but also man-made.
Will the three fire incident have an effect on officials fate?
Let’s take a look.
Three fire accidents began on 31st May,
the first one occurred in a depot of the China Grain Reserves
Corporation (Sinograin) in Lindian county, Helongjiang province.
Sources say 79 barns containing 47,000 tons
of grain were burned.
And the damage is expected to be as much as 100 million Yuan.
On 2nd June, two oil residue tanks exploded in a
PetroChina outlet in Dalian.
On 3rd June 3, a fire broke out in a poultry plant in Dehui city,
Jilin province with several hundreds of people were injured.
In order to implement a campaign of “anti-corruption and
beat the tiger”, ordered by Wang Qishan, a new leader of the
Central Commission for Discipline Inspectionang (CCDI),
the CCDI formed a team to carry out local investigations.
It’s a coincident that Sinograin’s fire incident occured
while CCDI were handling corruption cases in the local area.
Outsiders questioned whether the Sinograin’s fire incident
was a tactic and deliberately lit to destroy the evidence?
Xing Tianxing, current affairs commentator:
“At this critical time, especially in Sinograin,
many grain reserve problems were
constantly exposed in the past.
In fact, its grain storage bases are empty, at this moment,
Sinograin is under investigation by the CCDI,
but a fire broke-out, people will logically think that
Sinograin attempted to cover up the facts."
Up till now, media of the CCP have dramatically
changed their reporting of fire damage in Sinograin.
Within 24 hours, the CCP’s statistic of damage
was reduced to 30 times less than its previous report.
Ding Laifeng, a deputy editor of PR magazine
in Mainland China questioned on a microblog:
The damage of Sinograin’s fire incident was reported with
losses at more than 100 million Yuan for the first time,
then changed it to nearly 100 million Yuan,
80 million Yuan and 3 million Yuan.
Do they dare to say: Sinograin’s fire incident
losses are several hundreds of millions of GDP!
Three consecutive fire incidents occurred in Northeast China.
It happened during Xi’s visit abroad.
Thus it triggered speculation about a “conspiracy theory".
Hong Kong’s Ming Pao newspaper analyzed that Sinograin
and PetroChina experienced fire disasters one after another.
Some people said that it was a tactic against
state-owned enterprises.
It is likely to be the same as the Wenzhou’s train crash,
which took place in 2011. Finally, the Ministry of Railways demised.
Meanwhile, some people are thinking about the
Jilin Provincial party secretary, Wang Rulin and
Governor Bayanqolu and Heilongjiang
Provincial governor Lu Hao.
They belong to the Communist Youth League faction,
but the recent fire accidents aren’t good for them.
Xing Tianxing said that if the same incident happened
in a foreign country, it wouldn’t have aroused
the same heated speculation as here.
Why is the outcome different in China, and why do
the people believe that the accidents are a “conspiracy"?
Xing Tianxing:"This relates to
the CCP’s fundamental system.
The Communist has always been engaged in trickery,
the Chinese regime is opaque.
The CCP covers up internal power struggle,
but revealing the truth would shock the nation.
When these things have happened, people who
are familiar with the CCP’s evil nature will think of
what the communist conspiracy is engaged in this time?"
Ming Pao’s article said that apart from
the “conspiracy theory",
the recent consecutive serious disasters are indeed a series of
warnings towards the supervision of industry safety in China.
Xing Tianxing: “Inadequate supervision
is the leading cause of fire disasters.
Supervision problems has a history problems.
Food safety also relates to the supervision issue.
Why is supervision ineffective?
We all know that it direct relates to the CCP system
which uses self-examination and self-management."
The Epoch Times analyzed that large state-owned enterprises
like PetrolChina and Sinopec are controlled by Jiang Zemin,
Zhou Yongkang and Zeng Qinghong.
They stole from the country’s interests and the wealth
that citizens’had established.
Xiao Xiaoqiang, China’s current affairs commentator:
Sinograin used the fire incident to welcome
the CCDI’s investigation.
It shows that highest-levels of the CCP are seriously split.
All CCP’s interest groups including Jiang Zemin
refuse to change nor give up its interests.
Thus, any means to solve the problem of corruption
within the CCP system will encounter deadly resistance,
furthermore, they don’t care if it would cost the
destruction of China’s social stability and CCP rule.
