【新唐人2013年05月23日訊】中共機關刊物《求是》雜誌屬下的半月刊《紅旗文稿》刊登署名文章，指出：憲政的關鍵性制度元素和理念只屬於資本主義，而不屬於社會主義制度。大陸學者對這種文革思維邏輯感到驚訝和好笑，也對文章可能預示中共高層將收緊政治開放而感到擔憂。
文章的題目是《憲政與人民民主制度之比較研究》，文章的作者是「中國人民大學」法學院教授楊曉青。
文章一開頭就表示，近來中國社會上和學界有關「憲政」的呼聲抬頭。一些人還提出在中國實行西方憲政的基本理念和基本主張，認為「中國夢即憲政夢」，甚至還有人論述了「社會主義憲政」的概念。但楊曉青認為，「憲政」不屬於中國共產黨推行的「社會主義人民民主制度」。
「北京外國語大學」國際傳播研究中心主任喬木表示，楊曉青的思維和話語結構，完全是階級鬥爭意識形態的產物。喬木說，就連中共高層領導人歷來，表面上也是肯定憲法和憲政的。
喬木說，在今天的中國，不管現實如何艱難，但是既然有這個憲法，人們還是希望依憲治國。但是楊曉青的文章公然推翻全世界的文明發展演進，壓制人們對憲政的追求。他對於出現這樣逆潮流而動的言論，覺得非常難以理解。
北京外國語大學國際傳播研究中心主任喬木：「最近突然發了好多莫名其妙的文章，讓人匪夷所思，我不知道是一種偶然，還是新領導人上臺以後一種思想和輿論方向的一種導向。如果說一般的網站比如《烏有之鄉》或個人的博客，推出這樣的觀點，不需要做太多的追究。但是從紅旗文稿它這個背景來說，不能不讓人警惕，到底怎麼走？我有這個擔心。」
在去年12月4號紀念憲法公布30週年大會上，習近平表示，要恪守憲法原則、弘揚憲法精神、履行憲法使命，並且強調，憲法的生命在於實施。喬木認為，習近平的這些講話體現的也是憲政思想。現在高層背景的刊物發表楊曉青的這篇文章，跟習近平的講話互相矛盾，令人困惑和擔憂。
北京註冊會計師杜延林表示，楊曉青的文章如果是出現在文革時期，倒是不奇怪。但是放在今天的時代，就令人感到好笑。
北京註冊會計師杜延林：「我就很奇怪了，那中國的憲法是個甚麼東西呢？中國為甚麼要制定一個憲法呢？我就很奇怪，她列舉的社會主義元素到底是甚麼？那麼這個社會主義元素到底是導致了中國走向文明還是回到文革那種狀態？或者更乾脆的說，所謂的人民民主專政理論要再提的話，那我們就自然聯想到朝鮮。」
杜延林表示，隨著柏林牆的倒塌，所謂社會主義陣營和社會主義理論實踐，已經被證明是一個失敗的結果，那麼這些元素在現代這樣一個文明的社會裏，到底能帶來甚麼？
杜延林：「這篇文章如果是官方授意出籠的話，那恰恰就說明瞭那些寄希望於中共高層領導人，新一屆領導人進行改革或者走一個溫和改革路線的知識份子，對他們又是潑了一盆涼水。這種幻想可能是太天真了。因為當中國共產黨從一個意識形態政黨蛻變成一個利益政黨以後，它就更難以放棄自己的既得利益和手中的權力，而去進行所謂的改革。 」
杜延林表示，楊曉青的文章可能進一步印證了：今天共產黨的意識形態並沒有太大的變化。
採訪編輯/秦雪 後製/葛雷
CCP Magazine – Xi Jinping’s Remarks Unconstitutional
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) magazine
Hongqi Wengao published an article, insisting
that key elements of the system and ideals of the Constitution
belong to the capitalism system, not to socialism.
Scholars are surprised and feel queasy about this
Cultural Revolution ideology.
They are also worried that the article fore-warns that
the CCP’s high-level will clamp down on political openness.
constitutional and the people’s democratic systems".
The article was written by Prof. Yang Xiaoqing
in Renming University of China, law school.
The article begins, that recently, the voices for
the constitutional system are rising up from the community and academic field.
Some people suggest using western countries’
constitutional system and philosophy and basic principles.
Some of them claim that:"China’s Dream
is the Dream of having a Constitutional System".
Some people even discuss the concept of the
“socialist constitutional system".
However, Yang Xiaoqing believes that the constitutional
system doesn’t belong to the socialist democratic system that the CCP has promoted.
Qiao Mu, director of International Communications Research
Center of Beijing Foreign Language University commented.
He said that Yang Xiaoqing’s thinking and words are
completely a class conflict ideology.
Qiao said that on the surface, all former CCP leadership also
accepted the Constitution and the constitutional system.
Qiao Mu said that today in China, no matter how difficult
the current situation is, people still want to see the rule of law and justice control the country.
However, Yang Xiaoqing’s article blatantly overthrows
the process of world civilization, and the
suppression of people’s pursuit of the constitutional system.
Qiao found it was very difficult to understand Yang’s opinion.
Qiao Mu: “Recently, they published many strange articles.
I am not sure if it is just a coincident or is the new
leadership’s thought or designed to mold public opinion.
If it is published by Wuyouzhixiang (a website that
promotes Mao Zedong’s ideology) or an individual blog, we don’t need to pay much attention.
But, it is published by Hongqi Wengao magazine with
it’s CCP background – we need to be alert.
What is the real plan? I am worried."
On December 4, 2012, at a meeting to commemorate the
30th anniversary of the current Constitution’s declaration,
Xi Jinping said that we must abide by constitutional
principles, carrying forward the spirit of the Constitution,
and to fulfill the mission of the Constitution.
Xi stressed that the anima of the Constitution is implementation.
Qiao Mu believes that Xi’s remarks are constitutional thought.
But with the magazine’s high-level background publishing
Yang’s article critical of Xi’s words, it is confusing and a cause for alarm.
Du Yanlin, chartered accountant in Beijing said that
Yang’s article wouldn’t be any surprised if it was published in the Cultural Revolution era.
But it is ridiculous to turn up now.
Du Yanlin, Beijing Chartered Accountant:
“I am very surprised. What is China’s Constitution?
Why did China make a Constitution? I feel strange.
What do Yang’s socialism elements refer to?
The socialism elements in the end may lead China
to civilization or a return to the Cultural Revolution?
Generally speaking, if the so-called people’s
democratic dictatorship is mentioned again,
we will naturally think of North Korea."
Du said that following the Berlin Walls’ collapse, the
so-called socialist camp and practices proved to be a failure.
Then what outcome will these elements bring to
current civilized society?
Du Yanlin:"If this article was deliberately published
with official approval,
it painfully indicates that people who put hope on the CCP’s
high-level leadership or wish the new leadership to reform,
or for intellectuals who encourage moderate reform,
they will feel like their hopes are being dashed.
This concept may be too naive. But since the CCP has
transformed from an ideological party to an interest group,
it is now even more difficult to give up its interest,
its taste for gain and power, instead of carrying forward with reform."
Du said that Yang’s article further proved that
today’s CCP has not changed much."
