【新唐人2013年05月17日訊】日前，中共中央辦公廳印發了《關於當前意識形態領域情況的通報》，簡稱為「中辦發」2013「9號」。但是，5月15號，一條被指為是「國家互聯網信息辦」的指令，要求各網刪除「中辦發(2013)9號」文件的相關內容。目前網路上的相關討論和新聞鏈接已被刪除完畢。
5月8號，重慶市城鄉建設委員會黨組召開學習「九號文件」會議。媒體報導了文件中的內容，包括七個方面的所謂「突出問題」。
如﹕要求各級黨委（支部）充分認清、加強意識形態領域工作的重大意義，和充分認識西方宣揚的觀點、理論的所謂危害性﹔其次，要求各級黨委（支部）要把意識形態工作，納入重要議事日程，經常分析研判意識形態領域的新情況、新動向，並及時有效的加以應對、防範和處理好意識形態領域的各種所謂矛盾問題等。
「九號文件」最後強調要強化網絡管理，加強輿論引導，和所謂淨化網絡環境—-不給「不法份子」任何可趁之機。
這份措辭強硬的《通報》，與不久前針對高校教師教學要求「七不講」的內容相呼應，也就是，不要對學生談及「普世價值、新聞自由、公民社會、公民權利、黨（中共）的歷史錯誤、權貴資產階級、司法獨立」等內容。
《法國國際廣播電臺》在報導中分析，這次「國信辦」要求網站刪除「九號文件」的相關討論，是中共「內外有別，內緊外鬆」的政治策略。
時事評論員邢天行：「它（中共）一方面嘴上高喊要自由，要和諧社會，搞一些名堂，但是另一方面，意識形態領域的打壓，隨之在暗中不斷的加緊，整個的態勢它是在不斷的收緊的過程。」
近來，中共官方與民間在意識形態領域的鬥爭不斷，對公共知識份子、律師、學者等民間自由派力量的打壓，比過去更加嚴厲。在過去以刪帖為主的言論收緊，已經演變成了﹕一大批擁有大量粉絲的公共知識份子陸續被封號、封博。
報導還強調，這一通報的下達，代表未來至少一年，中國大陸整個社會輿論和意識形態的管制，將有一個「嚴管期」。
邢天行：「所以它為了保持它自己的這樣一種穩定，它必須要加強這個意識形態，也就是它要管人的大腦，還要給人洗腦，這樣它才能保證自己的存在，那麼就是它為了維護它的生存，它必須要加強意識形態領域的控制能力。」
此外，針對「九號文件」及高校「七不講」的傳言，大陸官方至今沒有出來澄清。不過，現在「七不講」和《關於當前意識形態領域情況的通報》都遭到屏蔽，曾刊登過相關消息的重慶某報、河南《安陽日報》、吉林《遼源日報》的新聞鏈接也都失效。
畢業於復旦大學、「中國基督徒民主黨」發言人陸東分析，「九號文件」的發佈是有人內外佈局，要對新領導人習近平所代表的良心派，全面進攻。
中國基督徒民主黨發言人陸東：「因為他還沒有準備好，九號文件的發佈呀，它是處於中共處於一個…就是紅色江山搖搖慾墜的狀況下發佈的，中共已經知道在意識形態上面的失敗，就會導致它整個政權合法性的喪失。我們不認為習近平目前是黨、政、軍大權在握，而是中共的體制所綁架的這麼一個有良知的領導人。」
香港《開放》雜誌編輯蔡詠梅在接受《自由亞洲電臺》採訪時表示，「九號文件」秘密傳達，顯得理不直、氣不壯。
蔡詠梅表示，到底當前中國大陸的意識形態是甚麼？遇到哪些「突出問題」﹖當局沒有講，而普世價值、新聞自由、公民社會等意識形態，溫家寶都在講，現在卻完全不能講了。蔡詠梅認為，這是偷偷摸摸的行為。她覺得，中共現在這個政權，有點風雨飄搖的味道。
採訪編輯/常春 後製/薛莉
State Bureau for Letters and Calls Ordered to Urgently Delete “File No. 9”
Recently, the General Office of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee issued “Notification on Current Ideological Field Situation”, which is referred to as “General Office" 2013 “File No. 9″. However, on May 15, an order from “National Internet Information Office” ordered all the websites to delete related articles of the “General Office (2013) File No. 9″. Now, all the related discussions and news connections have been deleted.
On May 8, the CCP Chongqing Urban and Rural Construction Committee organized a meeting to study “File No. 9″. Media reported the outline of the file, which included exposing the so called seven “outstanding issues“, in various reports of the meeting.
Such as: Require each level of the party organizations to recognize sufficiently the importance of strengthening ideological field work, recognize adequately the risk of promoting western views and theories. Second, require each level of the party to put ideological work into the important tasks agenda and to analyze new situations and trends in the ideological field, as well as reacting, protecting and dealing with all so-called contradictions efficiently.
“File No. 9″ emphasized strengthening internet management, strengthening guidance of public opinion and cleaning the internet environment, with a view to not giving “criminals” any change.
This strongly worded “notification” echoed the content of the “7 non-speaking” instructions released a short while before, and addressed to university teachers and professors. The “7 non-speaking” instructions include not telling students about ”universal values“, freedom of the press, civil society, civil rights, party’s (CCP) historical mistakes, the power of the bourgeoisie, the independence of the judiciary".
“Radio France Internationale” analyzed in its report that the State Bureau for Letters and Calls asking websites to delete the related discussions of “File No. 9” is the CCP’s political strategy which is to “differentiate the inside and outside, to tighten the inside and loosen the outside”.
Xing Tianxing, a political commentator: ”On the one hand, (CCP) shouts for freedom, harmonious society, and other slogans, but on the other hand, it suppresses the ideological field by secretly tightening control. It is a constant tightening process.“
Recently, the struggle between CCP officials and citizens is Invariably in the ideological field. The suppression of public intellectuals, lawyers, academics other private liberal forces is tougher than before. In the field of public opinion, it was mainly focused on deleting discussion, but now it has been upgraded to closing the intellectuals’ blogs and micro-blogs which have a large number of followers and supporters.
The report also emphasized that the distribution of this notification means that there will be a strict one year control period in mainland China in the fields of ideology and public opinion.
Xing Tianxing: “In order to maintain its stability, the CCP must strengthen this kind of repression, which means it wants to control people’s minds, wash people’s brains. Only in this way can it guarantee it’s continued existence. To maintain this existence, it must strengthen it’s control.“
In addition, for the discussions about “File No. 9” and the universities』 “7 No-speaking ”rules, the CCP hasn’t declaimed until now. However the exposure of “File No. 9” and “7 No-speaking” rules is not allowed. The news page website links of a Chongqing newspaper, Henan “Anyang Daily”, the Jilin “Liaoyuan Daily” have both been deleted.
Lu Dong, spokesman for the “Chinese Christian Democratic Party”, who graduated from Fudan University, analyzed that the release of File No 9 is the arrangement of one gang of insiders in the CCP. It intentionally used it to launch a full-scale attack on the conscience faction which is led by Xi Jinping.
Lu Dong, spokesman of “Chinese Christian Democratic Party”, “Because he hasn’t prepared well. The release of File No.9 comes at a time of difficulty for Xi and the CCP, which knows that failure in ideological control will lead it to lose the legitimacy of the regime. We don’t think Xi Jinping controls the real power of the party, the regime itself and the military. It’s the CCP system that has kidnapped him, a conscientious leader."
Cai Yongmei, editor of Hong Kong Open" magazine told “Radio Free Asia" that, the secret distribution of File No. 9 shows that the CCP is illegitimate and cowardly.
Cai Yongmei said what on earth is the ideology of mainland China? Which kinds of “outstanding problems” does it meet? The authority doesn’t say. In addition, the universal values, press freedom, civil society and other ideological terms were used by Wen Jiabao before, but now they are forbidden from mention in China. Cai Yongmei thinks it』s a sneaky action. She thinks the CCP’s current policy is very precarious.
