【新唐人2012年7月20日訊】17、18號，《環球時報》連發兩篇力挺「毛澤東思想的文章」，同時《新華網》等喉舌網站也在18號轉載了一篇《人民日報》兩個月以前的舊文，重提要以回歸馬克思主義毛澤東思想來堅持中國特色。評論人士認為，這一動向是中共高層「十八大」向左轉的訊號。
人民日報集團的《環球時報》連發兩篇頌毛文章。17號是北京航天大學教授張文木的《十八大後中國將向傳統回歸》，18號是從體制外回歸於體制內的作家摩羅的《評價毛澤東，一些人有點過頭了》。
張文木的文章認為，十八大將標誌著中共向傳統，即馬列主義、毛澤東思想回歸，並從中尋找力量。而摩羅的評論則批評說，近期對毛澤東的有些批判，的確是過頭了。
網路作家荊楚指出，對於毛澤東這種一生不斷製造事端，利用各種政治運動害死8千萬中國人的「大魔頭」，應該徹底清算。
荊楚：「毛澤東喪盡天良，禍國殃民，傷天害理…給中國人民只是帶來了苦難，帶來了血淚，怎麼過頭了？應該把毛澤東拖出來鞭屍，挫骨揚灰才應了他的歷史地位。」
北京知名作家鐵流也指出，毛澤東是中國最大的一個動亂因素。他們這些經歷了毛時代，還活在世上的人，就是毛澤東罪惡的見證。
摩羅還在文章中稱，毛澤東那一代人把中國從那群帝國主義魔爪中解救出來，由此中國才結束長達百餘年的失敗與沉淪。因此毛澤東作為大戰略家，有指引和統率的功勞。
前「山東大學」歷史教授劉因全指出，這是共產黨一貫使用的顛倒黑白、歪曲歷史的謊言。他說，實際上當時美國一直支持維護中國領土完整。反而是毛澤東和蘇聯互相利用，推翻了當時的中國合法政府，中共竊政後，不僅沒有提升中國的國際地位，還丟失了許多主權。
劉因全：「特別是美國，提出了維護中國的主權和領土完整，也就是所謂的門戶開放政策。這是美國提出來的，美國一直是維護中國的領土完整和主權的，美國反對瓜分中國，反對佔領中國的領土，這是歷史事實嘛。中國共產黨政權還割讓了大量的領土給其他國家，你像給緬甸，給印度，給越南，這都是賣國行為的。這些在國民黨政府沒有做，在以前的北洋政府也沒有做，他們都沒有做這些賣國的事情，也就是說從這個方面看毛澤東他出賣了國家利益，造成了中國的國際地位低下。」
除了《環球時報》之外，《新華網》等其他喉舌媒體網站也在18號不約而同的刊發一篇「挺毛」的舊文。
這篇《人民日報》5月9號的文章，兩個月後標題改成「人民日報刊登署名文章談中國特色社會主義道路」重新出現。文章的核心是：要以回歸「馬克思主義」，「毛澤東思想」，來堅持中國特色。文中「馬克思主義」一詞出現6次，「毛澤東」出現6次，而「鄧小平」才3次，明顯和近三十年來，官文中「鄧小平」出現頻率高於「馬克思」，「毛澤東」的宣傳口徑相反。
有評論認為，《新華社》在北戴河會議前再次刊登兩月前的舊文，很可能是中共高層中回歸毛澤東的意見佔了上峰，所以讓向全黨發出向左轉信號。
劉因全指出，如果再回歸到毛時代，社會將大倒退，中國會進一步陷入專制獨裁。而如果「十八大」向左轉，中共有可能走向法西斯的道路，狹隘的民主主義道路，中共將會加速滅亡。
十八大召開之前，中共黨內內鬥空前激烈，各派紛紛通過媒體放風，製造輿論。因此喉舌媒體也不時出現色彩不一致的文章。
採訪編輯/李韻 後製/朱娣
Mouthpiece Article Signals CCP’s Leftist Turn at 18th Assembly
On July 17 and 18, the Global Times published two articles
promoting “Maoist thoughts.”
On July 18, Xinhua News Agency and other CCP mouthpiece
websites reproduced an article published in People’s Daily two months ago, calling for returning to Maoism.
Critics believe that this signal’s CCP’s leftist turn upon
its 18th national assembly.
On July 17, Global Times newspaper, member in the People’s
Daily Group, published an article titled,
“China’s Return to Tradition after 18th Assembly” by
Zhang Wenmu, professor at Beijing Aerospace University.
On July 18, it published another article by writer Mo Luo
titled, “Some Have Gone Too Far in Evaluating Mao Zedong.”
Mo Luo came to cooperate with the authorities after being
an independent writer.
Zhang’s articles said CCP’s 18th National Assembly marks
a return to its tradition of Marxism-Leninism and Maoist belief.
Mo Luo commented that recent criticism over Mao Zedong
has indeed gone too far.
Internet writer Jing Chu pointed out that Mao Zedong waged
disturbances throughout his life, killing 80 million Chinese people in successive political movements.
The crimes of this “great Satan” need to be publicly judged.
Jing Chu: “Mao Zedong completely lost his conscience.
He caused severe disasters to China and its people,
bringing nothing but tears and blood.
His body deserves to be dragged out and smashed.
Only that can be a fair retribution for what he did in history.”
Well-known Beijing writer, Tie Liu, also said, “Mao Zedong
was the foremost factor for China’s turmoil.
Those who lived through the Mao era witnessed Mao’s crimes.”
Mo Luo said in his article, Mao and his comrades saved China
from the clutches of imperialism, putting an end to 100 years of decadence.
As a great strategist, Mao Zedong thus should be credited
for his guidance and command.
Liu Yinquan, former history professor at Shandong University,
said Mo Luo’s words show CCP’s usual trick of distorting history.
He pointed out that the United States actually supported
China’s territorial integrity.
Instead, Mao Zedong and the Soviet Union collaborated
to overthrow the official government of China.
After the CCP took power, they not only failed to improve
China’s international status, but also lost a lot of sovereignty.
Liu Yinquan: “United States particularly proposed to safeguard
China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, that is, the so-called open-door policy.
The United States was opposed to occupying China’s territory,
or sharing privileges in China among foreign countries.
The CCP regime ceded a lot of territories to other countries
such as Myanmar, India, and Vietnam.
These are sheer traitorous behaviors.
These traitorous behaviors had never been done by
any previous regimes in Chinese history, except this Communist Regime.
Mao Zedong betrayed China’s national interests,
resulting in China’s underprivileged status in the world.”
In addition to the Global Times, Xinhua Agency and other
mouthpiece media also published an article on the 18th in support of Maoism.
This article was originally published in People’s Daily
on May 9.
It now reappeared with the new title, “People’s Daily Published
Authored Article on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.”
The article calls for a return to Marxism and Maoism
to maintain “Chinese Characteristics.”
“Marxism” and “Mao Zedong” each appeared six times
in the article, yet “Deng Xiaoping" only three times.
This contradicts the usual situation of the past 30 years,
where “Deng Xiaoping” appeared more frequently than “Marx” or “Mao Zedong” in official articles.
Some commentators believe that Xinhua News Agency
reproduced this old article before CCP’s Beidaihe meeting
probably because among its leaders the opinion of returning
to Maoism prevailed.
This article thus sent a signal about the Party’s left turn.
Liu Yinquan pointed out that a return to the Mao era would
incur great social retrogression, pulling China further into dictatorship.
If CCP turns further left at its 18th Assembly, it will probably
follow the path of Fascism and a narrow nationalism, which will only accelerate CCP’s demise.
CCP saw fierce fights among its factions before 18th Assembly.
All factions tried to manipulate the media to release their own
messages, resulting in inconsistencies even in mouthpiece media.
