【新唐人2012年6月28日訊】近來，廣東突然發生多起群體抗暴事件，被視為「下一個溫家寶」的廣東省委書記汪洋，將如何面對？成為人們關注的焦點。分析指出，「廣東烏坎民選事件」，汪洋表現的很開明，但是，這樣的改革能走多遠？當觸及到中共本身體制問題的時候，改革派是否能繼續走下去？也有分析認為，群體事件到處都有，在當下敏感時期廣東特別突顯，懷疑是政法委書記周永康等血債派在搗亂。
「廣東抗暴事件」頻發，5月25號廣州七百多名退伍老兵及軍轉幹部，到廣州市政府請願，要求當局落實安置和優撫政策。25號下午2000多名佛山龍江左灘村民也舉行抗議，要求兩名正副村書記交待私自賣地的事情和款項。26號，汕頭市近3000村民，遊行十幾公里到市委辦門外，抗議官員侵吞土地補償款，並投訴當地水源受造紙廠廢水污染。
6月25號，廣東中山市沙溪鎮一名來自重慶的少年，因與當地一名13歲的小學生發生矛盾，而被當地治安隊綑綁示眾，因此激怒了來自四川等地的民工，有近萬人包圍鎮政府，超過千名防暴警察和武警到場，雙方發生衝突，很多民眾被打傷住院，傳出有多人被打死，事態發展嚴重。
被《路透社》稱為「下一個溫家寶」的廣東省委書記汪洋，最近出國訪問，《澳廣》報導指稱，「汪洋是中國政壇的一顆新星，被廣泛認為是改革派領導人之一。」
去年，廣東烏坎村村民舉行大規模示威抗議，村民趕走村委幹部、實行自治，經過幾個月的抗爭，最終當局讓步。
汪洋當時曾表示，他希望烏坎能為「改進全廣東的村級治理」提供一個樣板。但網路作家吳建國質疑，當觸及到中共本身利益的時候，改革派是否能繼續走下去？
網路作家吳建國：「廣東頻發維權抗暴事件，這也是一種契機，看汪洋能否能像處理烏坎的抗暴事件一樣，在基層實現真正的民主選舉。但現在的問題是，這樣的改革能走多遠，因為當初你這個烏坎村只是個小村而已，可以視而不見，但是，如果範圍大了，特別是觸及到中共本身利益的時侯，這個改革派是否能繼續走下去，那是一個很大的問題。」
旅美中國社會問題研究人士張健表示，中國的老百姓並沒有因為某一個人的執政，而得到本質上的改變，這足以證明是這個體制給人造成的問題，不是某一個人可以改變的。
旅美中國社會問題研究人士 張健：「你鞠躬盡瘁在中國也無法改變這個現象，只說在你當一個小地方官的時候，有可能用你手中的這個權力，會給某一個地方、某一小部分人包括百姓，可能得到一點點福祉，但是這個福祉的基礎是在維護中共的統治基礎上，如果說老百姓，對中國的統治有絲毫的懷疑，或者你想起來想推翻他們的話，那麼你這種福祉馬上就變成嚴酷的鎮壓。」
廣東中山抗暴民工來自四川，政法委書記周永康曾經擔任四川省委書記。歷史學家劉因全懷疑，這一系列的事件可能有一個幕後的黑手在操縱。
劉因全：「比如說他們會讓警察武警故意的製造一些激化矛盾，你像四川民工的事，我感覺這簡直就是人為的在製造一個事件。這個很像李旺陽在湖南“被自殺”差不多，因為我們知道，湖南的省委書記也是團派的周強。政法委系統的人，他們故意製造李旺陽事件，然後把罪名加到周強的頭上去，廣東也是，他們完全可以故意激化一些事件。」
劉因全還預測，7月1號胡錦濤到香港訪問，周永康他們還會給胡錦濤製造各種事端。
採訪編輯/常春 後製/肖顏
Is Zhou Yongkang making troubles for Wang Yang by irritating mass protests?
Mass protests have frequently taken place in Guangdong
Province lately.
How Wang Yang, considered the next “Wen Jiabao,”
will tackle them has captured public attention.
According to analysts, Wang Yang was very open-minded
about the previous “Wukan Incident in Guangdong,” but how far can these kind of reforms go?
When touching on the intrinsic problems of Chinese
Communist Party』s (CCP) regime, can the reformers go any further?
Other analyses say that mass protests are now prevalent,
but they question whether the many taking place in Guangdong
during this period of time might be manipulated by Zhou Yongkang,
head of the Central Political and Legislative Committee (PLC). Here is more on the story.
Mass protests take place frequently in Guangdong lately.
On May 25, over 700 veterans in Guangzhou City petitioned
to the municipal government for assignment and compensation.
On the same day, over 2,000 villagers from Zuotan Village,
Foshan City, protested against two village party secretaries´ illicit sale of land.
On May 26, 3,000 villagers who live near Shantou City
walked over 10 kilometers to the Municipal Committee
Office to protest against local officials´ plundering land
compensation and local paper factories´ polluting water.
On June 25, in Shaxi Town, Zhongshan City, a teenager from
Chongqing had a conflict with another 13-year-old local pupil,
and was strapped up by a local guard for public display.
This irritated other rural workers from Sichuan Province.
Nearly 10 thousand people surrounded the municipal
government, and a conflict with over 1 thousand riot police and army ensued on the spot.
The situation was serious and many people were injured
and sent to the hospital. It is said that several people died.
During his Australia visit, Wang Yang, secretary
of Guangdong Party Committee, called “the next Wen Jiabao”
by Reuters, was thought to be a rising star in China´s politics,
and widely considered one of the reform leaders.”
Last year, Wukan villagers in Guangdong held a mass protest.
They got removed the village committee and executed autonomy.
After several months´ protest, the authorities compromised.
Wang Yang claimed that he hopes Wukan can be a model
for “the improvement of village management in Guangdong.”
However, Wu Jianguo, an Internet writer, questioned whether
the reformers can go further while touching on the interest of the party itself.
Wu Jianguo, an Internet writer: “The recent mass protests
in Guangdong might be opportunities for Wang Yang to realize a democratic election at grassroot level just like Wukan Village.
But the problem is how far this kind of reform can go.
The previous Wukan was just a tiny village.
But if the reform extends and touches on the party´s interest,
whether these reformers can go further becomes the major problem.”
Zhang Jian, China expert residing in US, said that Chinese
people´ lives never change intrinsically under any official´s leadership.
It proves that the problem is the entire regime,
and cannot be solved by a single person.
Zhang Jian, China expert residing in US: “No matter how hard
you try, you cannot change the situation in China.
Maybe as a small local official you can benefit some people
with the limited power in your hand. But the benefit is based on CCP´s regime.
If people have any doubt about the regime or want to overturn
it, this benefit can turn into cruel suppression overnight.”
The rural workers who protested in Zhongshan City,
Guangdong Province, are from Sichuan Province, where
Zhou Yongkang, current head of the Central PLC,
used to be Provincial Party secretary.
Historian Liu Yinquan suspects that a power behind the scenes
is manipulating these incidents.
Liu Yinquan: “For example, they can create conflicts
on purpose through the police or army.
The Rural Worker Incident in Sichuan, which I think
is contrived, is very similar to Li Wangyang´s murder in Hunan.
Hunan´s provincial Party secretary, Zhou Qiang, also belongs
to Hu Jintao´s Youth League Faction,
therefore the PLC created the Li Wangyang Incident and
pinned the crime on Zhou Qiang.
It is similar in Guangdong, where they can totally
intensify some conflicts on purpose.”
Liu Yinquan also predicted that Zhou Yongkang would make
troubles for Hu Jintao during his visit to Hong Kong on July 1.
