【新唐人2012年4月6日訊】4月5號，湖北《恩施晚報》報導，滬渝高速交警，4月1號23點多截獲了一輛從重慶開往東北的紅色普通貨車，車上私自運載了12,033發殺傷力強的炮彈。消息傳出，各大媒體紛紛轉載，網友也高度關注。但不久，《恩施晚報》網站刪除了這篇文章。幾個小時後，《恩施晚報》網站又發了一條消息說：「普通貨車運輸炮彈一事，屬正常的軍品運輸，已於次日上午放行」。
外界認為這個解釋漏洞百出，有專家指出，非軍用車輛私自運輸軍火在大陸是重罪。網友也紛紛質疑，有人說：「如屬正常軍品運輸，爲何要用民用車輛掩飾？」還有人說：「 1號的事情，5號出報導，而且還出不全？次日放行爲何不一塊兒發佈出來？」還有網友猜測：「司機怎麽會不知道車裏裝了甚麽，一個重慶公司怎麽會有權力託運這種重型殺傷性武器？」，「是不是爲了轉移罪證呢？或者打算逼宮？」
今年清明節，正是中共內訌引全球關注的時候，中共一系列不同往常的行動，引起各方猜測。
據報導，今年有200多位民衆前往北京富強胡同6號，悼念已故前中共領導人趙紫陽，不少「敏感人士」得以入內，給人當局放鬆管制的印象；
同時，中共官方媒體《中新社》4月3號發表的悼念前中共領導人胡耀邦的文章，也被大陸近百家媒體轉載，範圍之大前所未有，中外輿論高度關注中共媒體這個舉動的用意。
有分析認爲，這次高調紀念胡耀邦，明顯是胡溫在背後發力，一來打擊薄熙來，二是向周永康示威。而具有江系背景的《鳳凰網》卻在清明節特刊中高調悼念林彪，而將毛澤東排除在外。外界議論說，這是中共又一波的內鬥開始。也有人認爲，民衆悼念林彪，意味著用行動表達拋棄中共的意願。
4月4號，中共當局強迫中國著名異議藝術家艾未未關閉在家中安裝的四個網路攝像頭，停止「真人秀」。不過，中共雖然強迫艾未未停止「自我監控」，但是，艾未未工作室外中共警方安裝的15個攝像頭，依然沒有間斷的對他進行監控。
“Normal Munitions Transportation” Questioned
Hubei Enshi Evening News reported on April 5, of a truck,
intercepted on the highway near Chongqing on April 1.
The ordinary looking red truck was carrying unauthorized
12,033 deadly artillery shells, the report said.
The news was swiftly republished by China’s major media,
highly attracting netizens’ attention.
However, the original news report was soon removed
from the website of Enshi Evening News.
A few hours later, the website published
an update on the news.
It read, “The ordinary truck’s shipment of artillery shells
is a normal munitions transportation, and the next morning the vehicle was permitted to pass through.”
Outside commentators deemed the explanation
deeply flawed.
Using non-military vehicles for munitions transportation
falls into the category of grave crimes, said an expert.
Netizens too expressed their suspicions
by a slew of online postings.
A posting read, “If it is a normal military transportation,
why using a civilian vehicle to conceal it?"
Another said, “The issue happened on April 1, but was
reported on April 5.
Why was the coverage still incomplete?
Why it didn’t include the news about next-day’s passing?”
A netizen questioned, “How come the driver was unaware
of what he carried in the truck at that time?
How can a Chongqing company have such a power to
consign for shipment of such weapons for mass destruction?
Is this to transfer evidence of crimes?
Or it was intended to force the top leadership to abdicate?”
This year’s Tomb Sweeping Day was caught up in the
moment with Chinese Communist Party’ (CCP) infighting.
A string of unusual moves taken by the regime
have aroused speculations from various sectors.
Over 200 people went to late Zhao Ziyang’s residence
in Beijing to pay their homage, according to news reports.
Many “sensitive” activists were allowed to enter, giving
the impression that the authorities’ control got loose.
On April 3, CCP’s official media published an article,
commemorating Hu Yaobang, the late CCP leader.
Unprecedentedly, nearly 100 media outlets in China
reproduced the article.
This CCP’ official media move drew world-wide attention
and speculation about its real intention.
Analysts say, Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao are behind
the high-profile commemoration of Hu Yaobang.
This is a way to fight against Bo Xilai,
and to demonstrate power to Zhou Yongkang.
Jiang’s clique’ backed website Ifeng.com
released a special issue for Tomb Sweeping Day.
The special issue mourned Lin Biao in a high profile,
but excluded Mao Zedong.
Outside commentators said that another wave
of CCP’s infighting had started.
While others viewed the mourning of Li Biao
as a sign of people’s willingness to desert the CCP.
On April 4, CCP’ regime ordered renowned artist Ai Weiwei
to switch off the four live webcams he set up in his home.
Though CCP forced Ai to shut down his “self surveillance,”
the 15 installed by the police cameras outside Ai’s studio have never stopped operating.
