【新唐人2012年1月3日訊】「清華大學」當代國際關係研究院院長閻學通，在12月30號出版的《環球時報》上撰文說，世界格局正向「兩超多強」轉變，就是說，中國縮小和美國的差距，成為另一個「超級大國」。但《環球網》的民意調查顯示，近90％的網民不認同這個觀點。經濟專家預測，由於中國國內矛盾激化，今後中國在國際空間的作用將進一步縮小。
「中國是否已經成為一個超級大國？」對此，中國老百姓最有發言權。
《環球網》12月30號展開調查，截至1月月1號8點，87.6%投票的網友不認同這種說法，認為從人民生活水平、國民素質、工商業實力來講，中國離超級大國都還有很大距離。
廣州陳先生：「你看看這個國家，支撐國家的四個最主要的方面－－工業、農業、軍隊、還有年青人，學生，都沒有甚麼保障，何來大國之稱？何來超級大國之稱？」
廣州陳先生分析說，目前中國的工業主要是外來產品加工，沒有自己的核心技術，和代表性的品牌﹔農村蕭條，農民由於收入低下，流入城市做農民工，農村土地大量被徵收；而轉業退伍軍人由於95％以上失業，紛紛起來維權；甚至學生畢業後找工作也非常困難，畢業等於失業。
而北京市民周中認為，「超級大國」這個詞有不同的定義。
北京市民周中：「這個內涵很豐富，如果說從經濟上，或者是專制這方面，對於政權的控制上，那中國絕對屬於超級大國。那麼，如果要說從人權上，人民的生活水平上，包括一些人均GDP來說，那你比美國那沒法兒比了。可能國際上排100多位了，這個都有統計數據。」
中國網民發文說，中國人均收入排名全世界第109位，在敘利亞後頭；環境指數全球排名133；而中共政府清廉指數排名世界第71；中國的公務員佔總人口比例全世界第一，是世界上政府經費最高的國家。美國公民可以免簽進入159個國家，而中國只有38個。
中國社會經濟問題專家程曉農：「『兩超多強』是閻學通提出來的，這是一個中國御用的學者。中國根本不能和美國相提並論，作為兩個超級強國來比較。因為實際上中國已經不再崛起了，它只是一個韜光養晦，待在那兒，盡量的把注意力放在解決國內問題上。所以它在國際社會上談不上是甚麼超強的國家。」
程曉農指出，實際上中共官方早在去年年底之前就悄悄地停止了「中國崛起」的宣傳，因為中國經濟在2011年大轉折，從表面上的繁榮開始轉向越來越大的困難，而網絡言論，烏坎事件等也普遍反映出，中國民間對政府的不滿達到了空前的高度。但中共的第五代班底並沒有實際辦法來解決這些問題。
程曉農認為，並不存在「兩個超強」的問題。他說，美國作為一個強國，在世界上仍然有它很大的發揮作用的空間。而中國實際上是在縮小它在國際空間裡的作用。
新唐人記者常春、尚燕、蕭宇採訪報導。
*********
Is China a Superpower? 90% Netizens Say No
A “Global Times” article has stated the world situation is
changing to “two superpowers, plus multiple strong powers.”
The author was Yan Xuetong, Head of Contemporary
International Relations Research Institute, Tsinghua University.
The article said China has shortened the gap between the US
and itself, and changed into another “Superpower”.
But in a “Global Times” survey, nearly 90% of netizens
disagreed.
Economics experts predict China’s role in the international
community will be further reduced by domestic conflicts.
“Did China become a superpower?” Chinese people are
the right group to decide.
The “Global Times" website started an online survey running
from December 30th until 8:00am January 1st.
87.6% of netizens voted “No”, feeling there is still a large
gap to bridge before China is a superpower.
Aspects include standard of living, quality of life for people,
and industrial capability.
Mr. Chen from Guangzhou: “Looking at this country,
there are four main supporting parts.
Industry, agriculture, military and young people/ students.
But all of them cannot be protected.
How can people call it a big power? How can people call it a
superpower?”
Chen analyses that currently, most Chinese industry is
manufacturing for foreign countries.
Enterprises have neither core technology nor have
representative brands.
In rural area, farmers don’t have enough income and
have to go to the city as migrant workers.
At the same time, their lands are confiscated by
local governments.
95% of veterans are unemployed, and they have to stand up
to protect their benefits.
Students can’t find a job after graduating from university.
Graduation is equal to unemployment.
Zhou Zhong, a Beijing resident thought “superpower”
has different definitions.
Zhou Zhong: “The meaning is very varied.
If we say the economy, the dictatorship or the political
control, China is absolutely a superpower.
But if we say the human rights, the citizen’s living standard,
GDP per capita, China can’t compare with the U.S.
China is after No.100 in the international ranking lists.
There’s statistical data to support.”
In an article posted by a Chinese netizen, China’s income per
capita is ranked No. 109 in the world, which is behind Syria.
China’s environment index is No. 133, and the communist
regime’s corruption index is ranked No. 71.
The percentage of China’s civil servants is the highest in the
world, and government funding is the biggest in the world.
A U.S. citizen can enter 159 counties without a Visa,
but Chinese only can enter 38 countries.
Cheng Xiaonong, a China socio-economic expert: “Yan
Xuetong who proposed there are 『two super, multiple strong』
is a party scholar. Fundamentally, China can’t compare with
the United States, and can’t compare as two strong powers.
China cannot rise much longer. It can only stay there and try
its best to focus on the civil problems.
So, it can’t be a super country in the international community.”
Cheng Xiaonong pointed out that the Chinese regime
stopped using “rise” in their self-promotion.
Chinese economy had a major turning point in 2011. It
changed from apparent prosperity to more and more difficulty.
Chinese dissatisfaction with the government has reached
unprecedented levels.
The CCP’s fifth leadership team has no clue how to solve
these problems, such as the Wukan events.
Cheng Xiaonong thinks that there’s no “two superpowers”.
He said that as a strong power, the U.S. still can play a big role
in the world. But China’s role is shrinking.
NTD Reporters: Chang Chun, Shang Yan and Xiao Yu
