【新唐人2011年11月26日訊】政法大學副教授吳法天在微博暗指艾未未涉嫌非法集資罪，樂評人健崔也在網上回應想要「揍」他的信息，北京警方24號以威脅他人人身安全罪，對健崔實施拘留5天的處罰。法律界人士認為，警方違反行政執法比例原則。
警方通報說，這是北京警方破獲首起網路威脅人身安全的案件。但官方的說辭和做法引起了網友們的極大不滿。
北京知名律師莫少平表示，行政執法是有比例原則的。表露要打人本身這種意願，雖然不妥當。但是對於這種表露，採取行政拘留作法值得討論。
莫少平：「刑法執法的比例原則是甚麼呢？就是說他本身違反行政法規的一種違法行為，要和對他進行處罰的行政處罰應該是相適應。那麼也就是說，不能他一個很輕微的一種行政違法行為，你就給他一個很重的行政處罰。這個也是違反行政執法的一個基本原則。所以，如果僅僅是這個網友是在網上表露這麼一個意思，就給他行政拘留5天，這個我覺得是過重了。也就是違反了行政法的一個比例原則。」
「吳法天」本名吳丹紅，最近一年來，他在互聯網上十分活躍，有頗多出位的言論，因為頻繁攻擊有良知的媒體和媒體人、及知識份子、藝術家等，被網民稱之為「高級五毛」。
吳丹紅雖然企圖隱瞞自己的真實身份，但因為網民的人肉搜索不再隱瞞，而在新浪微博上以中國政法大學副教授的身份加以認證。
莫少平：「當然，我也是了解一點，像吳法天等人在網路上發表的一些言論，最起碼我認為是不夠負責任的。他有些言論可能對事實，就應該說是甚麼呢？不講基本的事實。甚至還有一些攻擊。人身攻擊的這種語詞，那麼這種作法的本身這個也應該說是不對的。」
律師何輝新認為，吳法天打著政法大學副教授的幌子，曲解法律，隨意編造法律構陷公民！
而健崔在網上說：「我特別想去打他致其雙手殘疾，無法再混淆視聽，讓他知道自己到底是誰。」
對於健崔被拘留，「六四天網」創辦人黃琦認為，警方是有選擇性執法。
黃琦：「同樣的網路，語言恐嚇事件，依然對民間社會進行威脅恐嚇的部分人士，也未受到任何追究。同時我們所提供服務的很多網民，在向警方舉報政府人員，警察，以及維穩人員對他們進行毆打和威脅後，就被警方抓捕入獄。可以說中國警方選擇性執法的現象，在這個事件中暴露無遺。」
黃琦認為，每個公民的言論自由權利，都應受到法律保護。任何公民都有在各個平臺上，發表自己對公共事務意見的權利。也不應該因此受到來自任何政治勢力的打壓。
新唐人記者 李韻 唐睿 李若琳 採訪報導
Challenge Hack Writer Online, Jian Cui was Arrested in China
Wu Fatian, Associate Professor of China University of
Politics, via micro-blog,said Ai Weiwei is suspected of illegal fund-raising.
In response, Jian Cui, a musician commentator, replied online
that he wants to beat Wu.
Then Beijing Police arrested Jian Cui and charged him with
threatening others』 safety on November 24th, and will detain him for 5 days.
Legal professionals comment, that the police violated the
principle of administrative law enforcement.
Beijing police announced that this is their first case that
relates to online personal safety being threatened.
But netizens are great dissatisfied with the official rhetoric
and action.
Mo Shaoping, the famous Beijing lawyer, said that
there』s proportional principle in law enforcement.
Although it』s not right to express the intention to beat
someone, administrative detention is something that needs to be discussed.
Mo Shaoping: ”What』s the proportional principle in
law enforcement? The administrative punishment should be proportional to the crime.
Which also means that a criminal with a light crime can』t be
punished with a heavy punishment. This is a basic principle.
So, a netizen expressed opinion online, “you punished him
with 5 days』 detention!
I think it』s too much, it violates the proportional principle.”
Wu Fatian』s real name is Wu Danhong. In recent years,
he was very active on internet, and made many controversial remarks,
which attacked the conscience media, the intellectuals, artists, and so on.
He was named ”senior *fifty cents” by netizens.
**（fifty cents is a special group of people in China.
They are hired by the government, and earn fifty cents for each
pro-government comment they send out in BBS, blog, etc.
So far, there may be hundreds of thousands of Fifty Cents in China）
Wu Danhong attempted to conceal his real identity,
but finally he admitted that he is the Associate Processor
in China University of Politics on Sina microblog because
he was afraid of the netizens』 investment power.
Mo Shaoping:”Of course, I also know something.
Like Wu Fatian, those people aren』t responsible to publish some comments online.
Some of their comments were not the basic truth.
Even some of them are attacks. The personal attacks are wrong.”
Lawyer He Huixin said that Wu Fatian uses the title of
Associate Professor of Politics to misinterpret the law, and create a law in order to frame citizens.
Jian Cui, a musician commentator said online:”I particularly
want to beat Wu Fatian, to disable his hands,
so he can no longer mislead the public,
as well as let him know who he is.”
Huang Qi, founder of “June Fourth Skynet”,
said the detention of Jian Cui showed that the police are using selective enforcement.
Huang Qi: ”On the same internet, many people aren』t taking
any accountability, they are even always threatening the civil society.
But there』s many netizens we served, who were arrested by
police when they told police that they were beaten,
they were threatened by government officials,
police and security officials.
I can say this case shows the selective enforcement by
Chinese police.”
Huang Qi thought, each citizen should have the right to
express their opinion freely, and this right should be protected by law.
Every citizen should have right to comment on public affairs,
and should not be pressured by any political power.
NTD Reporters: Li Yun, Tang Rui and Li Ruilin
