【禁聞】騰訊控股主席管控微博研新招

【新唐人2011年11月2日訊】騰訊控股主席馬化騰表示,因應中央和社會對於阻止虛假信息在網上傳播的要求,騰訊公司正在研究新的方法監控騰訊微博服務上的內容。分析認為,這是找藉口為中共獨裁專制辨護。

週一(31日)騰訊公司(Tencent)CEO馬化騰(Pony Ma)出席北京舉辦的科技博客大會﹙TechCrunch Disrupt﹚時表示,正在研究新的方法監控騰訊微博上的內容,他說,公司對出現在微博上的虛假信息感到棘手,網絡用戶可能認為這些虛假信息是真的。

前山東大學教授孫文廣認為,馬化騰是為中共當局辨護。

孫文廣:“所謂的虛假信息,就是民眾有的揭發中共當局的一些醜行,他們講是虛假的,為中共當局辨護。實際上現在需要造謠的、需要製造假信息的是某些官員呢,真正的人民群眾當然希望知道真相。”

曾在多家媒體工作的「結石寶寶之家」發起人趙連海,也是騰迅微博的使用者,他認為,馬化騰這是找理由企圖扼死人說話的權力。

趙連海:“從目前來看我們總體還是對騰迅微博比較認可,認為騰迅公司堅守一些原則,但如果馬化騰就這麼刻意的去執行(監控微博)下去的話,我們不得不對騰迅公司,包括馬化騰本人我們要有很多的看法了。”

趙連海說,用各種理由和藉口去扼死人說話的權力,應該遭到遣責和鄙視,希望更好的人站出來抵制。

孫文廣則強調,微博本身正是揭露謊言的一個有利工具。

孫文廣:“有很多的微博是吧,大家可以來糾正啊。就是微博是一種糾錯、糾偏、闢謠的一種很有力的手段啊。”

今年9月,新浪首席執行官曹國偉說,公司正在針對新浪微博開發管控系統,以降低這個極具人氣的社交媒體工具,對所謂的社會穩定構成風險。

一些微博用戶抱怨新浪微博隨意刪除他們的言論,有人表示將拒絕使用新浪微博。

知名傳媒人北風在推特上號召,發佈新浪審核工作人員他們的個人信息,給他們壓力,讓他們認識現在從事的工作就是一種恥辱,是對歷史和人民的犯罪。

知名撰稿人宋石男發表一篇題為「我為甚麽離開新浪微博」的文章,表示新浪微博是「創造性的限制談話內容」,他們使用方法無非四種:刪帖、屏蔽貼、禁言及刪ID。

趙連海在新浪微博也經常遭刪帖及封閉賬戶,他說已不再使用新浪。

趙連海:“新浪目前有所謂的闢謠,甚麼這樣那樣的,實際上很多的時候是把有很多真實的事情,他們去說成是假的,很多人就說嘛,真正的造謠者才是他們。中共在很多事情上顛倒黑白,顛倒是非,實際上普通民眾都已經看到了。”

趙連海表示,希望騰迅公司三思。他說,今天扼殺言論於無形之中,就是為獨裁專制助紂為虐。

新唐人記者李韻、郭敬採訪報導。

A New Method To Control Tencent’s Microblog

Tencent CEO and president, Ma Huateng, said that
in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) requests and that of the public,
Tencent is developing a new method to monitor blogger’s
Internet posts on Tencent’s microblog.
Analysts say that this is an excuse to defend the CCP’s
authoritarian dictatorship.

On October 31, at the Tech Crunch Disrupt Conference,
Tencent CEO Ma Huateng said that
a new method is under development
to monitor Tencent’s microblog posts.
He claimed that false information posted on microblogs is
a touchy issue, for netizens might believe what they hear.

Former professor at Shandong University, Sun Wenguang,
commented that Ma Huateng is defending the CCP.

Sun Wenguang: “The false information he is referring to
is the CCP authorities’ evildoings uncovered by civilians.
His claims actually defend and support the CCP authorities.

In reality, many times its officials who deliberately release
rumors and spread fabricated news.
The public is genuinely eager to know the truth.”

Zhao Lianhai, a former media professional and founder of
“Home for the Kidney Stone Babies" (Jieshibaobao.com) is one of Tencent’s microblog users.
He believes that Ma’s claims are simply excuses
designed to strangle people’s right to speak.

Zhao Lianhai: “At present, we generally accept Tencent’s
microblog, for it still adheres to some principles.
But if Ma Huateng goes so far as to intentionally control
the microblog, then we all have to express our opposing views to Tencent, and to all those who support Ma.”

Zhao Lianhai said that the practice of using various excuses
and means to strangle people’s right to speak should be condemned and despised.
He expected more people to stand up to resist such behavior.

Sun Wenguang stressed that the microblog itself is
a powerful tool to expose lies.

Sun Wenguang: “There are many microblogs.
So we all can utilize them to correct things.
The mircroblog itself is a very powerful means to correct,
rectify, and refute rumors.”

This September, Sina CEO, Charles Cao, said that
Sina is developing a system that will help control its microblog environment.
He claims that this new system will reduce risks
associated with his wildly popular social media tool,
in order to promote so-called social stability.

Some Sina microblog users complained that their posts were
randomly deleted.
Some netizens said that they refuse to use Sina’s microblog.

A renown media professional, Bei Feng,
appealed to Facebook users saying that
netizens are releasing personal information
on Sina’s censor staff in order to exert pressure on them,
and to help them realize that what they do is shameful
and that they are committing crimes against history and humanity.

Song Shinan, a renowned writer, published an article titled
“Why I left Sina’s microblog?"
He revealed that Sina’s microblog is “creatively limiting remarks”
by using methods like deleting posts, block posts,
forbidding certain postings, and deleting users’ IDs.

Zhao Lianhai had many of his Sina posts deleted
and eventually, his account was closed.
He said that he would not use Sina any more.

Zhao Lianhai: “Sina’s claim that it needs to refute rumors
on its microbog, among other claims, is simply not true.
Actually, many people believe that the rumors they say
they need to refute, were precisely started by them.
In reality, the public has witnessed how the CCP distorts
the facts and has turned the facts upside down.”

Zhao Lianhai expected that Tencent would think twice.

He said that Tencent was stifling people’s speech,
which is the same thing as holding a candle to the authoritarian dictatorship.

NTD reporter Li Yun and Guo Jing

相關文章
評論
新版即將上線。評論功能暫時關閉。請見諒!