【新唐人2011年8月4日訊】知名維權人士王荔蕻，因參與「福建三網友圍觀」活動遭到拘留。而中共當局對她的罪名也一再更改，從「尋釁滋事罪」到「聚眾擾亂交通秩序罪」，再改回「尋釁滋事罪」。王荔蕻的罪名為甚麼讓中共如此反覆難定？中共又在打甚麼主意？請看報導。
維權人士王荔蕻的代理律師劉曉原在推特網上表示，8月1號北京朝陽區溫榆河法庭在對王荔蕻的起訴書上，再次將罪名改回“尋舋滋事罪”。劉曉原認為，當局找不到王荔蕻“聚眾擾亂交通秩序”的定罪證據，才又改為“尋舋滋事”，這個罪名打擊面很大，更容易用來定罪。顯示當局對王荔蕻判罪的決心，是要以維穩的晃子壓制維權人士。
維權人士趙連海表示，對王荔蕻不論是「聚眾擾亂交通秩序罪」，還是目前的「尋釁滋事罪」，都是莫須有的罪名，非常不公平。
趙連海：「官方在目前來講，我想常變更罪名是因為他們所謂“聚眾交通秩序罪”是完全不成立的，根本不成立的。目前他們就把很多無法確定的這些這個情況，都套到『尋釁滋事罪』裡。」
王荔蕻的兒子齊建翔說，有多名曾參與過"福建三網友圍觀團"的網友表示，願意為他母親王荔蕻作證，讓當局難以用「聚眾擾亂交通秩序」來定罪。當局這種先定罪名，後找證據的做法，說明他們已經達到喪心病狂的程度。
而王荔蕻的辯護律師韓一村向《美國之音》表示，“聚眾擾亂交通秩序罪，從證據上說，是嚴重不足，證據不充分。而刑法規定的尋釁滋事罪規定的籠統、寬泛。它猶如一個口袋，是或不是，它都可以往裡裝。”
趙連海：「目前這個“尋釁滋事罪”，他基本上像一個大框一樣，很多維權人士都是用這個罪名來對待，這個罪名是一個非常模糊一個罪名，本身它也是一個莫須有罪名，王大姊呢，怎麼說呢，今天遭受這樣的對待，我們非常多的人士非常痛心的。」
韓一村律師表示，案件已經進入庭審階段後，法院應當向辯護律師提供案件所有相關資料，但是朝陽區法院拒絕為他複製警方向法院提供的視頻資料。他對法庭是不是能公平公正審理王荔蕻不表樂觀。
香港的「中國維權律師關注組」執行秘書潘嘉偉分析指出，中共當局過去都是指定罪名，然後再根據罪名判罪，這樣多次更換罪名，說明當局正在為她羅列比較容易的罪名，這是當局濫用法律打擊維權人士典型的案例。他呼籲更多的港人站出來支持王荔蕻。
新唐人記者李韻、李庭、朱娣、採訪報導。
Wang’s “Trouble-Making Crime”
Well-known human rights activist Wang Lihong participated
in Fujian Three Netizens’ activities and has been detained.
Chinese authorities repeatedly changed her charges, from
“trouble-making” to “gathering a crowd to disturb traffic order”.
Why is it so hard for the communist regime
to decide on her charges? What is behind it?
Rights activist Wang Lihong’s attorney Liu Xiaoyuan
said on Twitter, on August 1 that
the court in Beijing’s Chaoyang District,
again changed Wang’s charges to “crime of trouble-making”.
Liu Xiaoyuan said that the authorities could not find
evidence for “gathering a crowd to disturb traffic order”,
so they changed the charges back to “trouble-making”.
This charge is more general and makes the conviction easier.
It shows authorities are determined to convict Wang Lihong.
They want to suppress human rights activists
using the excuse of maintaining stability.
Human rights activist Zhao Lianhai said, whatever Wang’s
charges, they are all trumped up and it is simply unfair.
Zhao Lianhai: I think the reason that
authorities often change charges is that
“gathering a crowd to disturb traffic order”
just does not have any base.
Now when they can’t decide the charges,
they simply label it “crime of trouble-making.”
Qi Jianxiang, Wang’s son said many people took part in
Fujian Three Netizens event are willing to testify for Wang,
so the authorities cannot convict her with
“gathering a crowd to disturb traffic order.”
Having the charges prior to finding the evidence
shows that the authorities are already desperate.
Wang Lihong’s attorney Han Yichun told Voice of America:
“For the ‘crime of gathering a crowd to disturb traffic order’,
the evidences are seriously inadequate and insufficient,
while provisions on trouble-making crime are quite general.
It is like a pocket; anything can be put into it.
Zhao Lianhai: “Nowadays, ‘trouble-making crime’
is being widely used against human rights activists.
But this crime has a very vague definition.
It is itself a non-existing crime.
Wang Lihong, is currently charged with that,
and we all are very saddened by it.”
Attorney Han Yichuna said, the case has entered trial stage.
The court should provide all relevant information to the
defense counsel.
However, the Court of Chaoyang District refused
to give him a copy of the video provided by the police.
He is not positive
the court will give Wang Lihong a fair trial.
Patrick Poon, Executive Secretary of Hong Kong’s
“China Human Rights Lawyers Concern Group" pointed out
that the Chinese authorities in the past gave certain charges,
then they would convict the defendant under these charges.
Now they change charges again and again, which shows
they first create a list of charges and
then choose the easiest to convict the person with.
This is a typical case of authorities abusing laws
against human rights activists.
He called for more people to come forward
and support Wang Lihong.
NTD reporters Li Yun, Li Ting and Zhu Di
