【新唐人2011年5月4日訊】十三歲武漢少年黃藝博，最近爆紅網路。因為他兩歲開始看“新聞聯播”，七歲開始讀“人民日報”“參考消息”，據說他在重要期刊上發表一百多篇文章，並把稿費贈送給孤寡老人。 這樣一個“又紅又專”的優秀典型卻遭到眾人嘲諷擔憂。
黃藝博是華師寄宿學校初一學生，身上籠罩了“全國百名優秀好少年”“武漢市首屆『十大孝星"等諸多光環，是標準的所謂“三好學生”“四有新人”。他還擔任“武漢市少先隊副總隊長”。
照片上的他戴著紅領巾和“五道槓”隊牌，神情泰然，坐在總部辦公室閱讀文件。看起來很有些官相。黃藝博父親說，“他上網只關注國內外新聞大事，從不玩遊戲。”
香港《東方日報》報導，有網民譏諷，看太多中共媒體報導腦袋會壞掉。有人特別針對央視，表示，《新聞聯播》內容過於官腔，看得多只會扼殺創造性，遑論成材。
中國經濟學者李華芳對《自由亞洲電臺》表示，一個心智尚未成熟的孩子每天被國家控制的媒體耳濡目染，結果堪憂。
李華芳說，對於意識形態教育而言，當一個小孩子還不足以做出判斷的時候，父母應該提供更多面向的選擇，要告訴他，在這個世界上並不是只有《人民日報》、只有《參考消息》、只有這些被國家控制的媒體發出聲音。
為甚麼這個在中共教育體制下的三好學生，優秀典型，卻引來眾人的嘲諷擔心？據了解，很多人早已經對共產黨的好幹部，好學生以及做“共產主義接班人”產生了反面觀感。
不過，成為共產黨的馴服工具，確實有物質上的誘惑。
山東大學退休教授孫文廣告訴《自由亞洲電臺》，這些人將來考學、參軍、考公務員都會有些照顧，所以，現在從幼稚園開始就灌輸小孩這些，用這些方式去教育，就形成了一些所謂的少年先進人物，就是一個共產黨的馴服工具。孫文廣教授說，過去最早的典型就是雷鋒，現在看來卻很愚蠢！
《財經網》上署名石述思的文章說，「黃藝博走紅只為證明中國教育有病」。石述思認為，黃奕博的成長道路是功利主義當道、價值觀紊亂的體現，在主流學校，家長和社會的灌輸下，黃藝博過早的完成了成人禮：他喊著無懈可擊的高尚口號，肩負著神聖使命，踐行著超出他年齡負荷的社會責任，終完成滅絕純真的壯舉。黃藝博的崛起暴露了中共教育的痼疾：以扭曲人性為代價，不斷的催生所謂的天使和真正的魔鬼。
不過，並非所有人都甘願接受中共的奴才教育。據了解，每年有大批西藏兒童冒著生命危險逃到印度達蘭薩拉，只為接受完整的母語教育和承襲民族傳統文化。
新唐人記者秦雪、劉惠綜合報導。
Kid’s Peculiarity Exposes Ailing Education
A 13-year-old Wuhan child Huang Yibo got famous
on the Internet, as he began to watch CCTV news at 2
and read People’s Daily at 7. He published 100+ articles
so far, with all his royalties donated to the elderly.
However, such a talent was instead mocked by netizens.
As a junior high student in a boarding school, Huang
was glorified with titles like National top 100 Excellent
Teenagers. He is regarded a classical model of good
student and filial son. He was also the deputy
team leader of Yong Pioneers in Wuhan City.
In photo, he looked like an official when dressed
in uniform and sat in a headquarter office reading
documents. His father said he never played any games
but read domestic or international news when online.
Hong Kong’s Oriental Daily said, some netizens mocked
that watching too much Communist (CCP)’s news
would damage one’s brain. The CCTV’s prime time news
has so much propaganda as to kill people’s creativity.
China’s economic scholar Li Huafang said to RFA,
it is worrisome for a minor to be dragged on like this
by the state media day after day.
Li said, for ideological education, it is the parents’
responsibility to guide the kids with multiple options,
and let the kids know the existence of other media
other than People’s Daily and those controlled by state.
Why was such a good student under the CCP’s education
system mocked by many people? This is because many
developed negative perception towards CCP’s so-called
“good cadres”, “good students” and “good successors.”
There was indeed material temptation to become
a servile tool of the CCP.
Sun Wenguang, retired professor of Shangdong Univ.
told RFA, these people are given priority for college,
military, and government jobs. The CCP begins to instill
its ideology even to children in the kindergarten,
forming some so-called progressive figures. In fact,
they are CCP’s servile tools. Sun said, such an example
before was Lei Feng, who was stupid when looking back.
Shi Shusi wrote on the Financial Network, “Huang Yibo’s
popularity signifies that Chinese education is ailing.
Shi said, Huang’s growth path is one of utilitarianism
and distorted values. Expedited by the school, parents
and the society, Huang got “mature” too soon: He chanted
perfect slogans, shouldered sacred responsibility and
fulfilled a social responsibility beyond his age.
He finally lost his innocence and childlike genuineness.
Huang’s peculiarity exposed the fact that the CCP’s
education was at the expense of distorting humanity.
Nevertheless, not all people are willing to receive
the CCP’s indoctrinated education. Every year, a large
number of Tibetan children risk their lives fleeing to
Dharamsala in India to receive Tibetan education.
NTD reporters Qin Xue and Liu Hui
