【新唐人2015年02月05日訊】中共黨刊《求是網》發表中共社科院「專家」朱繼東的文章，指中共教育部部長袁貴仁發表「禁止西方教材進入課堂」言論遭到「圍攻」，是因為「圍攻者」「沒有得到應有懲處」。這番話引發外界關注。有人認為是不是文革再現？隨後朱繼東也被網友起底。
中共教育部部長袁貴仁的「禁止西方教材進入課堂」的論調，激起網路媒體撻伐聲浪。不過，這幾天中共官方媒體紛紛跳出來為袁貴仁站臺撐腰。黨刊《求是》雜誌更是連續兩天發文力挺袁貴仁。
中國社科院國家文化安全與意識形態建設研究中心，副主任兼秘書長朱繼東，2月3號在中共期刊《求是》發表文章，聲稱袁貴仁的言行是職責所在，遭到圍攻的最根本原因是，「這些參與圍攻者近年來屢次圍攻在意識形態領域敢於亮劍者，並且沒有得到應有懲處。」
朱繼東還說，「一定要敢於拔釘子，對那些經常發表攻擊黨和社會主義的言論的教師要堅決清除。」
外界分析，朱繼東文章中的言辭，讓人聯想起中國的文化大革命，「清除和嚴懲」批評教育部長的學者和教師，等於是退回文革甚至反右時代。
英國廣播公司《BBC》，引用香港科技大學教授丁學良教授的觀點表示，自從左派政治代表人物薄熙來倒臺之後，中國政界、意識形態及有關領域中的這類「吆喝者」，失去了一個重要領軍人物，他們發表這類文革式極左言論，正是在做「政治風險投資」。
中國憲政學者 陳永苗：「我覺得中國的知識份子，因為受到文革的迫害之後，在後面對中國所有的問題看的都是很不理性的，都是用驚弓之鳥的心態，然後弓弦一響他們就覺得文革要來了。」
東南大學法學院教授 張讚寧：「我想是不可能的，因為文化大革命不得民心，它是沒有市場的，現在在提倡想恢覆文革時期的那種做法的那些人，主要是極少數既得利益集團的人在那裏鼓譟，像以薄熙來為主的這群人，當然這個我們不能掉以輕心，現在文革陰魂不散，如果我們掉以輕心的話，也就是文革在中國重演不是沒有可能的。」
此前，袁貴仁在一次高校領導人座談會上說，絕不能讓傳播西方價值觀念的教材進入大學課堂，決不允許各種攻擊誹謗黨的領導、抹黑社會主義的言論在大學課堂出現，決不允許教師在課堂上發牢騷、洩怨氣。
袁貴仁一席話，激起千層浪。
東南大學法學院教授 張讚寧：「我想，這些陳腔濫調在中國是沒有市場，現在還有人在講甚麼馬列主義、毛澤東思想，但是他一方面又要講馬列主義，一方面又要抵制西方甚麼思想影響，其實馬列主義就是西方的，這個陳腔濫調根本是很矛盾的。」
對於袁貴仁的言論，北京大學法學院副院長瀋巋提出三問，包括如何區分「西方價值」和「中國價值」、如何區分「攻擊誹謗黨的領導、抹黑社會主義」和「反思黨曾經走過的彎路、揭露黑暗現實」、如何讓其領導的教育部貫徹執行依憲治國依法治國的方針。
此後，網絡上引起激烈爭議。
朱繼東在文中點名，「三問袁貴仁」的某大學法學院教授，和他同一學院的一位大V教授，是進一步「煽風點火，製造了思想混亂」。
被朱繼東隱射批評的法律學者賀衛方2月3號下午，在個人認證微博發聲回應朱繼東，「不知他指的是哪一位？其中『屢屢發表攻擊黨和社會主義的言論』，那些言論？證據何在？」
賀衛方還質問，可否先規定領導人子女不到西方國家留學？
當天晚上，賀衛方再發微博，稱發現朱繼東「乃當年為薄的重慶模式搖旗吶喊的活躍人物，新華網前記者」，並附上一篇發表在新華網上、題為《專家聚焦重慶「唱讀講傳」活動：值得借鑒和推廣》的報導，報導中多張照片的攝影和主文記者都署名「朱繼東」。
不過，《求是》也承認，袁貴仁的觀點並非僅代表其個人，網上一些人表面上看是攻擊袁貴仁，實質是藉機表達對中共的不滿。
採訪/朱智善 編輯/黃億美 後製/舒燦
Communist Mouthpiece Supports Ban of Western Values
Communist mouthpiece Qiushi (www.qstheory.cn) published
a comment by Chinese Academy of Social Sciences scholar,
Zhu Jidong.
He says the attackers of Yuan Guiren have not received
the punishment they deserved.
Yuan, the head of the Ministry of Education, previously
tried to ban Western textbooks in China’s classrooms.
Some wonder if it’s another wave of the Cultural Revolution.
Netizens also revealed Zhu Jidong’s background.
Much criticism has been seen both online and in the media
on the recent comment by Yuan Guiren, China’s Minister of
Education: “No Western textbooks are allowed in class."
But the regime’s official media have voiced their support.
In particular, pro-Yuan articles have appeared in the Party
magazine, Qiushi, for two consecutive days.
Zhu Jidong, Party secretary of the Academy of Marxism
of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,
published an article on Qiushi on Feb. 3,
claiming that Yuan was fulfilling his duty as minister.
Zhu stated, “We must dare to ‘pull nails’; we must resolutely
clear out those teachers who attack the Party and socialism."
The comment has reminded some of the Cultural Revolution.
Zhu’s suggestion to “clear and punish" those who criticize
the minister of education is like going “back to the era of
Cultural Revolution or even the anti-rightist", said the BBC.
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Professor,
Ding Xueliang told the BBC that a ringleader of the politically
correct ideology within the regime has fallen along with
the leftist Bo Xilai.
This cultural revolutionary type of extreme-leftist remark
is a “risky investment."
Chinese constitutional scholar Chen Yongmiao: “I think
the Chinese intellectuals are irrational on the Chinese issues.
“They have been frightened by the persecution
during the Cultural Revolution.
“A little noise seems to signal to them
the return of the Cultural Revolution."
Zhang Zanning, Professor, Southeastern Univ. Law School:
“I think it is impossible—the Cultural Revolution is against
the people’s interest and has no market.
“Those who promote the ideology of the Cultural Revolution
are the very few with vested interests, such as Bo Xilai etc.
“Of course, we can’t take it lightly; the Cultural Revolution
still lingers and we must keep it from reoccurring."
Previously, Yuan Guiren had addressed at a forum
of university leaders that no textbooks of Western values
were allowed on campus; no remarks that attack, criticize
or defame China’s leadership nor socialism were allowed;
and no teachers were allowed to vent their complaints
or anger on this in class.
Yuan’s words stirred people.
Professor Zhang Zanning: “I think these clichés have no
market in China; no one believes in Marxism-Leninism
or in Mao Zedong’s Thought.
“He talked about Marxism-Leninism on one hand,
and about resisting Western ideologies on the other,
but Marxism-Leninism came from the West,
so his remark was completely contradictory."
Professor Shen Kui from Peking University Law School posed
three questions against Yuan’s address:
How to differentiate between Western values
and Chinese values; how to differentiate between
‘attacking Party leadership and socialism’ and ‘reflecting on
the Party’s mistakes and exposing the dark reality’;
and how the Ministry of Education would implement
the principle of the rule of law and rule of Constitution.
Vigorous Internet debates have thus started.
Zhu Jidong responded in his article by referring to Shen Kui’s
questions, and his colleagues have “fanned the flames
and caused ideological confusion."
Zhu’s colleague, law professor He Weifang, responded to Zhu
on Feb. 3 through his certified Weibo account, saying,
“Not sure who he’s referring to. As for ‘remarks attacking
the Party and socialism’, which ones? Is there evidence?"
He Weifang also criticized Zhu, suggesting that he instead
regulate leaders to not send their children abroad to study.
On the same day, He Weifang issued another blog
claiming new evidence.
In a report of Xinhua News Agency, He found Zhu Jidong’s
identity as a news reporter, cheering Bo’s Chongqing model.
A report by Zhu Jidong with many photos was attached
as evidence.
However, Qiushi admitted that Yuan Guiren’s views
were not solely his own; the attacks on Yuan were personal
on the surface, but reflected the complaints of people
against the CCP regime.
Interview/Zhu Zhishan Edit/Huang Yimei Post-Production/ShuCan