【新唐人2014年07月03日訊】香港「學民思潮」等學生團體2號凌晨在中環遮打道靜坐，預演「佔中」，遭到香港警方的清場，有500多人被抓，被抓的人士表示，遭到警方的不人道對待，香港各界也譴責警方濫用武力，也有大陸民眾被香港人爭取自由、民主感動，表示贊同「學聯」提出的「當不義成為事實，反抗便是義務」精神。
在上百萬香港市民走上街頭，參加「七一遊行」之後，大約有兩千名學生和市民，2號凌晨響應學生團體「學聯」和「學民思潮」的呼籲，預演「佔領中環」。他們分別「佔領」了遮打道和包圍特首辦公室。但遭到警方武力清場。
到早上八點鐘為止，一共有511人在中環佔領區被警方拘捕，其中包括立法議員李卓人、何俊仁和梁耀忠三人。被抓的人當中，有些遭到警察扭頸或扭手腕。警察逐個將他們拖走，然後送到當作臨時拘留所的「黃竹坑警校」。
前《香港聯合報》專欄作家張成覺：「我認為學民思潮提前預演0349佔領中環這是很必要的，而且他們也是很理性的，很克制的。北京方面的藉口，說會對香港造成甚麼樣的破壞和衝擊，是沒有的事情。特區政府因為要受北京的領導，要按照北京的意志辦事，所以香港警方必然的要對這樣的活動介入。」
參與抗議的團體之一「學聯」常委梁麗幗，在接受香港媒體採訪時表示，警方開始清場時，對沒有反抗的示威者勒頸、掩口等，同時還要求媒體離開，她質疑警方刻意封鎖消息。
而香港議員黃碧雲也表示，據被捕人士反映，在拘留的警察學院內，沒水喝也沒食物吃，但有警察就在他們面前吃起糯米雞。
《香港無線》電視報導，截至2號傍晚，仍然有大約129人，等候辦理取保候查或登記資料手續。至少20多人被控涉嫌犯有「協助組織非法集結罪」。
不過，「學聯」已經事先表示，「留守的人，有機會被警方拘控為非法集會。」
6月30號，「學聯」在發表「七一抗命宣言」時曾表示，「我們一群學生押下己身前途，甘願承擔法律後果，並非沖昏了頭腦， 而是相信只有當我們香港人挺立街頭，不懼政權，香港才能迎來真正的未來、獲得真正尊嚴自主。」並且說「當不義成為事實，反抗便是義務。」
大陸憲政學者陳永苗：「我覺得現在港臺的這些學生運動都很理性，在港臺的這些年輕人的身上，把革命中需要承擔的責任，他承擔起來了。如果有法律責任我願意承擔，我覺得這是一個公民社會非常大的進步。」
大陸民主黨人士馬強表示，看到香港民眾和平理性的反抗暴政，非常感動，而且他贊同學生提出的口號﹕「當不義成為事實，反抗便是義務」。
大陸民主黨人士馬強：「我覺得這句話說的很對，本身每個公民都有權利反抗。在某種意義上我覺得這種義務在很大程度上0359不是我們作為公民能夠選擇的，它更多的是共產黨或者這個執政體它自己選擇的。0447共產黨如何面對這種和平理性非暴力，如何去處理，你（中共）完全拒絕了和平、理性、非暴力行為的話，那麼你最終迎來的就是革命、暴力和清算。」
馬強表示，香港還沒有真正感受到獨裁體制，真正對共產黨絕望的是大陸人。他說，在大陸，包括訪民、被強拆戶、農民，他們都在燃起反抗的火焰。他說﹕「反抗便是義務」它不是一個理論，是對大陸現實的描述。
採訪編輯/田淨 後製/葛雷
Hundreds Arrested for Rehearsing Occupy Central Sit In
More than 500 people from student activist groups in
Hong Kong were arrested for rehearsing the sit in
for the Occupy Central protest at Chater Road.
People who were arrested say they faced inhumane treatment
by the police, who used excessive force.
Many Chinese mainlanders say they have felt moved
by the fight for freedom and democracy in Hong Kong.
They support the spirit of the Hong Kong
Federation of Students (HKFS):
“When injustice becomes fact, resistance becomes duty."
After millions of Hong Kongers took to the streets in a parade
on July 1, about 2,000 students and civilians held a rehearsal
for the Occupy Central, organized by the student activist
groups Scholarism and HKFS on the morning of July 2.
They ‘occupied’ Chater Road and surrounded the Chief
Executive Office, but were forcefully dispersed by the police.
By eight o’clock in the morning, a total of 511 people were
arrested, including legislators Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho
and Leung Yiu-chung.
The police used pressure point techniques
on those who were arrested.
Protesters were dragged away one by one, to the temporary
detention center, Wong Chuk Hang Police Academy.
Zhang Chengjue, former Hong Kong United Daily News
columnist: “I agree with the Occupy Central rehearsal.
They are very rational and very restrained.
Beijing’s claim that it will bring damage
and conflict to Hong Kong is not true.
Being subordinate to Beijing, the Hong Kong government
is acting in accordance with Beijing’s will.
So Hong Kong’s police will inevitably intervene in the protest."
HKFS standing committee member Leung Lai Kwok
told Hong Kong media that when police began to clear the scene,
they strangled protesters or shut their mouths,
and also demanded the media to leave.
She questioned why police deliberately blocked the news.
Legislator Helena Wong Pik-wan also said those
who were arrested said that they were given no food or water
during their detention, but some of the police were
eating chicken rice in front of them.
Hong Kong Wireless TV reported that around 129 people were
still in the process of bail pending application in the evening.
At least 20 people were accused of committing the crime of
“assisting unlawful assembly."
However, the HKFS had previously warned,
“People participating in the sit-in could face police arrest,
on the grounds of illegal gatherings."
On June 30, HKFS posted a statement,
titled the “July 1 Disobedience Statement."
It had said, “We are a group of students risking our future,
willing to bear the legal consequences.
We are not moonstruck. Rather, we believe that only when
we stand in the streets without fear of the regime, will we
usher in the real future and real self-dignity of Hong Kong."
It added: “When injustice becomes fact,
resistance becomes duty. “
Chen Yongmiao, Chinese constitutional scholar:
“I think the student movements in both Hong Kong and Taiwan
are very rational.
These young people pick up the responsibility of the revolution.
I think [their being] willing to assume legal responsibility
[for their actions] is a very big step forward for civil society."
Activist Ma Qiang says that he has felt moved by the peaceful
and rational actions by Hong Kong citizens to oppose tyranny.
He agrees with the slogan raised by the students:
When injustice becomes fact, they are obliged to resist.
Ma Qiang: “This remark is very correct.
Every citizen has the right to oppose.
In a sense, I think this duty was chosen not by the people,
but the Communist Party or the regime.
How will the Communist party face this peaceful, rational
and non-violent protest?
The complete rejection of the peaceful, rational and non-violent
behavior will eventually usher in revolution, violence
and the party being made to pay for its actions."
Ma Qiang says that Hong Kong has not really felt
the dictatorship, but the mainlanders have, and they have
completely lost hope in the Communist party.
Referring to the blaze of resistance from the petitioners,
demolished households, farmers, he says: “The motto of
‘obligation to resist’ is not just a theory,
but a realistic description of mainland China."
Interview & Edit/TianJin Post-Production/GeLei