【新唐人2014年01月22日訊】備受關注的「北京大學」起訴前「北大」教授鄒恆甫名譽侵權案，1月20號上午開庭審理。鄒恆甫是國際知名的經濟學家，也是「中央財經大學」教授。2012年8月，鄒恆甫在微博指摘「北大」院長在某餐廳吃飯，「只要看到漂亮服務員，就會下手姦淫，教授主任也不例外。」但是後來鄒恆甫把指責對像改為「少數教授」。

2012年8月21號，鄒恆甫在實名認證的《新浪》微博上發表言論說，「北京大學」的院長、教授、系主任們，在「夢桃源飯店」吃飯時姦淫漂亮的女服務員。他說，「除了鄒恆甫，北大淫棍太多。」

「北京大學」及北京「夢桃源」餐飲公司，以鄒恆甫的微博言論侵害名譽權為由，２０１２年９月，先後將鄒恆甫告上法院。

今年1月20號上午９點，北京海淀區法院對此進行了公開審理。鄒恆甫沒有出庭，由辯護律師代理。由於雙方不同意調解，法院將對擇日宣判。

鄒恆甫的辯護律師，全國政協委員，中華全國律師協會副會長朱征夫告訴《新唐人》，他們的主要辯護意見之一是，「北大」不是適格的法律主體，不具備控告鄒恆甫的主體資格。

前北大教授鄒恆甫辯護律師朱征夫﹕「因為鄒教授批評的是北大的少數教授，不是批評北大。北大的教授和北大，是兩個不同的主體和不同的法律關係。所以真正要告鄒教授，也應該是少數教授來告，而不是北大來告。所以北大，因為它不是鄒教授批評言論的直接對像，所以它沒有資格告鄒恆甫教授。」

朱征夫的第二個主要辯護意見是，北大是行政主體，不是民事主體。沒有名譽權。

朱征夫：「因為名譽權是一個民法中的私權，它只是民事主體才享有。那麼在本案，北大不是民事主體，它是行政管理主體，它跟少數教授之間的關係，是管理和被管理的關係。所以北大不享有名譽權。因為它不享有名譽權，所以也不存在名譽侵權的問題。」

朱征夫特地強調，鄒教授作為一個公民，他有批評權，監督權。

鄒恆甫提交了一些已經公開的證據，來證明他微博中所說的情況。

20號開庭當天，鄒恆甫發佈消息說，「在這個腐敗淫亂吃喝玩樂破壞中國神聖教育的時候，北大以學校的名義給少數淫棍打官司是多麼的好笑啊。」

朱征夫表示，他們向法庭提交了已經公開的證據，以證明「北大少數教授」有生活作風和行為不端的問題。但是還有一部分材料沒有提交。

朱征夫：「我們不提交的部分是北大的老師和學生舉報給鄒老師的材料，那些材料我們認為現在不宜公開，因為它會把事情搞的更加複雜。這些舉報材料的真實性還有待核查。我們現在需要進一步驗證。所以沒向法院提交。」

在法庭進行審理的同一天，鄒恆甫還在微博轉發《中新社》2009年的一篇報導，題為「前北大副校長（表示）：不想女兒被玩弄就別在國內讀博士」。

這位前副校長在飯局上對友人說，就他從周圍教授那裏得到的消息，目前中國的博士導師，除了所有的著作都是男研究生效勞完成的，基本上都會在適當的時候找一、兩個女博士生，而這些女博士生要想最後戴上博士帽，一定會把自己的身體獻給博導們。他說，據他們「北大」教授圈內的統計，全國高校中，高達70%以上的女博士，被新中國的博導們傳授「知識」的同時，也順帶被姦淫。

鄒恆甫目前擔任「世界銀行」研究部終身高級經濟學家、及「武漢大學」高級研究中心主任、「深圳大學」高級研究中心主任、「中央財經大學中國經濟與管理研究院」院長、和「中央財經大學中國經濟與管理研究院學術委員會」主席。他是1949年中共建政以來，首位進入美國「哈佛大學經濟系」並獲得「哈佛」經濟學博士學位的中國大陸學生。

鄒恆甫1998至2007年間，曾出任「北京大學光華管理學院」應用經濟學系系主任。

採訪編輯/秦雪 後製/李勇

Peking University Sues Former Professor for Online Weibo Post

A hearing for the defamation case of former Peking

University Professor Zou Hengfu took place on January 20.

Zou Hengfu is an internationally renowned economist and

a Professor of Central University of Finance and Economics.

In August 2012, a post by Professor Zou

on his Weibo alleged that the Peking University

faculty preyed on young staff at the restaurant.

He later referred to “a small number of professors and deans".

In a Sina Weibo post dated August 21, 2012, Zou Hengfu

stated that Peking University deans, professors, and

chairmen preyed on the waitresses at Mengtaoyuan.

Mengtaoyuan is a restaurant on the university campus.

He added that there are too many

lustful people in Peking University.

Both Peking University and the restaurant filed

lawsuits in September against Zou Hengfu.

This was on allegation of defamation in his Weibo post.

On January 20 at 9am, Beijing Haidian

District Court conducted a public hearing.

Zou Hengfu did not appear in court, but

was represented by his defense counsel.

The two sides did not agree on mediation,

so the court will choose a sentencing date.

Zou Hengfu’s lawyer, Zhu Zhengfu spoke to NTD.

One of their main defense points was that

Peking University is not an appropriate legal

body, and is not qualified to sue Zou Hengfu.

Zhu Zhengfu, defense attorney: “Professor Zou

criticized some professors at Peking University.

He did not criticize the University. Professors and the

University are two different identities and legal relations.

The ones to sue Professor Zou should

be those professors, not the University.

The University was not the direct object of Professor Zou’s

criticism, and thus not qualified to sue Professor Zou Hengfu."

Zhu Zhengfu’s second major defense point is that the Peking

University is an administrative body, and not a civil subject.

This body does not carry a reputation.

Zhu Zhengfu: “Defamation refers to private rights

in civil law, and are only enjoyed by a civil subject.

Being an administrative body, the relationship between

Peking University and a small number of professors

belongs to those managing and those managed.

Therefore, Peking University does

not enjoy the right of reputation.

Because it does not enjoy the right of

reputation, defamation is out of the question."

Zhu Zhengfu specially emphasized that Professor Zou,

as a citizen, has the right to criticize and supervise.

Zou Hengfu submitted some evidence that has been

made public, to back up his initial Weibo statement.

On the day of the hearing, Zou Hengfu issued a new post.

“In this era, when China’s sacred education is

being undermined by adulterous corruption and

entertainment, what an irony that Peking University

files lawsuit on behalf of those who are promiscuous."

Zhu Zhengfu says that they have submitted evidence to

the court, detailing the promiscuous lifestyle and misconduct

of those Peking University professors who were mentioned.

There is more evidence yet to be submitted.

Zhu Zhengfu: “Some evidence was provided

by staff and students of Peking University.

We don’t see it appropriate to present

it now, because of its complexity.

We still need time to further identify the authenticity of these

materials. That is why it is yet to be presented to the court."

During the date of the hearing, Zou Hengfu

also forwarded a 2009 article by China News.

It was entitled “Former Vice-Chancellor of Peking

University: If you don’t want your daughter being

molested, don’t let her study her Ph.D. in China."

This former Vice President revealed information to his friend

during dinner, according to the professors around him.

The doctoral advisors have all their

writings finished by the male students.

When appropriate, they will also

recruit a couple of female students.

These female students must devote their

body to the professor to get their diploma.

He added that internal estimation by professors

showed more than 70% of female Ph.D. students

have been raped while pursuing their degrees.

Zou Hengfu is a renowned economist, who has served at

the World Bank, Shenzhen University, Wuhan University

Department of Mathematical Economics and Finance,

and Central University of Finance and Economics.

He was the first Chinese Harvard doctoratal student in

economics since the Communist took the power in 1949.

Zou Hengfu was the Head of Guanghua School of

Management at Peking University between 1998 and 2007.

Interview & Edit/QinXue Post-Production/LiYong