【新唐人2013年11月05日訊】一部由中共軍方製作的記錄片《較量無聲》在網路公開後，迅速被熱傳並引發巨大爭議。但短短幾天，這部影片就原因不明的遭到大陸主流媒體的全面封殺，更引起諸多揣測。有分析認為，中共高層分裂嚴重，使得中宣部在壓力下不得不下令屏蔽視頻﹔也有消息說，這部影片只允許軍隊系統內部觀看，未經審批，不能公開。民間則認為影片內容過於荒誕，甚至淪為了笑柄，早日「消失」，好過顏面盡失。

由中國國防大學、總政治部保衛部、總參謀部三部、中國社會科學院、中國現代關係研究所聯合推出的記錄片《較量無聲》，在大陸網路熱傳不到幾天就遭到了各大網站逆襲屏蔽，引發了輿論各種猜測。

有評論分析，是中共內鬥的結果，也有人指出，影片是軍方「不慎」流出。但大多觀點認為，影片的內容引發的負面輿論和質疑聲浪，迫使中宣部不得不下令封殺視頻。

這部只有90分鐘的記錄片曾一度在網路引起軒然大波，影片內容也遭到巨大非議。帶有腦殘、可笑、荒誕、不符常理等字眼的評論盡出，有人甚至點出了片中的若干錯別字，諷刺製作方貽笑大方。甚至有網民將影片稱為：搞笑巨作。

影片用極為尖銳和文革批判式的語氣指出，中國正在被美國全面滲透和顛覆。影片還把當前大陸複雜的社會矛盾、中共官員的腐敗、維權事件頻發、公民抗爭、基督教的傳播，以及民間對憲政的呼聲等，都歸為美國的陰謀和滲透。

影片還譴責美國千方百計拉攏，收買，威脅和策反利用中國的學者，認為目前民間佔據主流地位的自由派知識份子是政治變節分子，他們公開發表反黨等賣國言論，為西方利益集團服務，畫面中還出現了茅于軾、賀衛方、夏業良等中國學者的名字和照片，引發了公共知識份子的不滿。

大陸廣西網路作家荊楚：「這種論斷，應該是那些毛左們製造的偽命題，因為毛左們對於自由民主這些基本的價值觀他們是一無所知，認為這個國家的腐敗啊、憤怒啊，都是美國挑起的。根本就是睜著眼睛說瞎話，自己的國家存在的問題，把這些問題推到美國就能夠解決問題了嗎？」

一位叫「巴南美術教研」的網民說，美國之所以要對中國實行和平演變是因為：歷史上的非民主國家像蘇聯、希特勒、二戰前的日本、現在的朝鮮等，無不是對外侵略成性，對內造成嚴重的人道主義災難。他建議茅于軾先生和賀衛方先生應該起訴製作《較量無聲》的單位。

「北京大學」法學院教授賀衛方回應說：「一個明智的民族一定會知道哪樣的觀念與主張是對自己真正有利的。那些青紅不分、是非不辨的論調，明智者付諸一笑而已。」

賀衛方還指出，《較量無聲》充斥著冷戰思維和煽動話語，把一些國家人民追求自由與民主的言行都妖魔化，甚至把因缺乏民主法治而導致的腐敗也說成美國陰謀，可笑之至！

不僅是國內輿論，一些國外媒體也對《較量無聲》提出了質疑。「英國廣播公司《BBC》」引用《紐約時報》的報導說，不清楚這個充斥了陰謀論的視頻是否被有意泄漏到網路﹔《法國國際廣播電臺》則指出，片中所謂美國顛覆中共政權的「十條誡令」純屬偽造，成為這部政論片的最大軟肋。《法廣》引用網友的話說：這份完全經不起入門級網友網路檢索的解說詞，既成笑柄，又浪費公帑。

採訪編輯/張天宇 後製/鍾元

Propaganda Documentary Silent Contest Deleted

The online release of the purported documentary film

“Silent Contest", produced by the Chinese military,

has been the cause of much controversy.

However, a few days after its release, the film has been

blocked by Chinese mainstream media for unclear reasons,

leading many speculate about the cause.

Some analysts say that it’s pressure from strong divisions

among senior levels of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP)

that led the Propaganda Ministry to order that

the video be removed.

Some say that the movie is confidential,

and can only be watched within the military organs.

Without the approval, it cannot be played in the public.

The public say the movie is too absurd, or is even a joke, and

the CCP quickly made it disappear in an attempt to save face.

The Chinese military’s National Defense University,

the General Political Security and General Staff Departments,

the Chinese Academy of Social Science and China Institutes

of Contemporary International Relations jointly

launched the film “Silent Contest".

The movie was circulated widely for a few days

and then deleted from the mainstream websites.

It aroused public speculation.

Some analysts say that it resulted from

the CCP’s internal struggles.

Some people say that the movie was leaked out

“accidentally” by the military.

The most widespread opinion is that the content of the movie

led to negative public opinion and questioning of the CCP,

forcing the Propaganda Department issues an order to remove

the video from the public arena.

The over 90-minute film has stirred up waves online.

The content has been badly criticized.

Some people described it as “brain-dead", “ridiculous",

“absurd" and “wacko".

Some people even picked up on several typos,

saying that the producer is ironic.

Some netizens call the movie as a comedy masterpiece.

The movie used extremely pointed rhetoric

reminiscent of Mao’s Cultural Revolution.

It says that China is being completely infiltrated and

subverted by the US.

The film also classified China’s complicated social conflicts,

the CCP officials’ corruption, human rights protests,

the spread of Christianity, and people’s urging for the launch

of a constitutional government, as a U.S. infiltration conspiracy.

The film condemns the U.S. for allegedly using the means of

bribery and threats to incite Chinese scholars to defect.

The film also says all the mainstream liberal intellectuals

in the society are political traitors, and that these intellectuals

openly published their opinions to oppose the CCP and betray

the country in service of Western interests groups.

Names and photos of well-known Chinese scholars including

Mao Yushi, He Weifang and Xie Yeliang were shown in the film,

provoking dissatisfaction from many intellectuals.

Jing Chu, Guangxi-based internet writer: “These arguments

were likely created by Maoist-leftists.

As they know nothing about democratic values.

They are lying when they claim Chinese officials’ corruption

and the people’s anger are provoked by the U.S.

Maybe they think they can resolve the country’s problems

by shifting them onto the U.S."

A netizen says that the U.S. hopes China can

peacefully enter democracy because undemocratic countries,

like North Korea, the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany,

and Japan in the past, all caused serious inhumane disasters.

This netizen suggests Mao Yushi and He Weifang to

sue the film-makers of Silent Contest.

He Weifang, Professor at Law School

of Peking University responded.

He said that a wise nation definitely knows which values

and ideas are really good for them.

He says the wiser just laugh at the groundless claims.

He Weifang says that the Silent Contest is full of Cold War

rhetoric and words meant to incite people.

It demonizes people’s expression

of their pursuit for freedom and democracy.

He also says it’s extremely ridiculous that the film tells

people that the CCP’s corruption, which caused is by lacking

of democratic law, was caused by a U.S. conspiracy.

Not only domestic public opinion, but also foreign news media

questioned Silent Contest.

BBC cited the New York Times saying that “it is not clear if

the video was intentionally released online or somehow leaked."

Radio France Internationale (RFI) says the film’s most bogus

claim is that the U.S. subverts the Chinese regime

with the “10 Commandments".

RFI cited a netizen who said that the things spoken of by

the film’s narrator cannot be found online,

and can only be seen as a joke and a waste of public money.