【禁聞】社科院幫腔 中共東施效顰顯愚陋

Facebook

【新唐人2013年08月12日訊】中共喉舌近期連續發表文章,詆譭憲政並為中共一黨專制打氣,聲稱要「堅定制度自信」。「中國社科院」甚至專門為此出臺一份問卷調查報告,與當局說法相呼應。但在外界看來,這些舉措反而凸顯中共在危機重重之下,已經處於失魂狀態,就像「東施效顰」典故里的醜女東施,一味的模仿美女西施,更加顯得愚蠢和醜陋。下面請看報導。

8月9號,中共中央機關報《人民日報》再次發表署名文章《為甚麼我們有制度自信》,鼓吹所謂的「中國特色社會主義」。作者中共廣東省委黨校教授鄭志國在文章中以經濟發展為由,為中共一黨專制進行辯護,聲稱:目前出現的社會問題不能歸咎於現行制度。

中國憲政學者陳永苗:「所謂的經濟發展,不過是過去100年的經濟積纍、工業積纍在30年之內的嚴重透支,和將來幾十年子孫後代的發展空間的嚴重透支。實際上就是一個敗家子把祖宗留下的家產跟子孫的田地全部給賣了。」

同樣是8月9號,中國社會科學院在北京舉行發佈會,公布了社科院「政治學研究所」進行的第一次全國性「中國公民政治文化」問卷的調查結果。報告宣稱:在10個省的6159名被調查者中,有近7成對中共和現行政策表示認同。

大陸專欄政論作家朱建國:「社科院本來就是官方的一個喉舌。那麼官方現在在反憲政、提倡對現有的專制『三自信』(道路自信、理論自信、制度自信)的背景下,指令他們做一些虛假的調查,那是很自然的。」

大陸專欄政論作家朱建國分析指出,現在的調查普遍採用百分制,5分制早已被取消,因為百分制更精確。但這個調查問卷仍然採用5分制,僅從這一點就可看出當局的心虛與不自信。

此外也有學者指出,中共出臺這樣的調查問卷,為了達到宣傳部門需要的結果,被調查者往往都是經過精心挑選的,不可能去找底層老百姓、訪民或者是被迫害的人來接受調查。

陳永苗:「在薩達姆倒臺之前,薩達姆每次選舉的得票率都是百分之百的。」

去年(2012年)11月,中共在18大政治報告中號稱,全黨要堅定「道路自信、理論自信、制度自信」,這一說法被外界稱為所謂的「三自信」。隨後,中共喉舌不斷大造輿論,對民主憲政等理念進行抨擊,並明確表白:「中國夢」就是保持中共一黨專制基礎上的「中國夢」。

最近,大陸多地更出現了所謂的「中國夢」系列廣告,「社會主義好」、「共產黨好」等露骨宣傳標語驚現街頭。民眾吐槽說,這讓人感覺又回到了「文革」時期。

陳永苗:「現在黨內高層、以及黨內理論口、宣傳口的這些人,他現在是處於這種欺人自欺、自欺欺人的狀態,是屬於一種迷魂的狀態。」

中國憲政學者陳永苗向《新唐人》表示,中共目前的輿論宣傳是一種失去魂魄的狀態,到底相信甚麼,當局自己都搞不清楚。

陳永苗:「西施和東施之間美貌的差距要差得很遠,那東施也可以舉其中的一點來效顰,眉毛也跟你搞得一樣,那我也是趕上你西施的,我跟你西施是齊名的。就像是『中國夢』和美國夢,可以有相通的道路一樣。」

陳永苗還強調,「中國社科院」本身就是中共的一個機構,不可能進行客觀的調查,所有以「社科院」名義公布的所謂調查結果大多數都是假的、作弊的。

採訪/朱智善 編輯/李謙 後製/周天

Chinese Regime ‘Imitates Beauty’, But Has Opposite Effect

A series of articles have appeared on Chinese

Communist Party (CCP) state controlled media.

They target constitutionalism, promote one-party rule,

and claim to have confidence in the CCP political system.

Meanwhile, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

(CASS) released questionnaire results supporting this.

Observers comment that these initiatives have

only highlighted the crises that the CCP is facing.

The party has no soul, but blindly tries to

create external appearances to justify itself.

In reality, however, this has the opposite

effect. Let’s take a look at our news.

On August 9, CCP state controlled

People’s Daily, published a commentary.

It was discussing “why the CCP

has confidence in its political system.”

It advocated “socialism with Chinese characteristics.”

The author, Zheng Zhiguo, is a professor at the Party

School of Guangdong Provincial CCP Committee.

On the grounds of economic development,

Zheng defends CCP one-party dictatorship.

He argues that the existing political system

cannot be blamed for current social problems.

Chen Miao, Constitutional scholar, China:

“The alleged economic development is actually

a 30-year overdraft from the previous 100-year

accumulation in the economy and industry.

It has also seriously overdrawn from the

development space of future generations.

This is, in effect, a black sheep who has

sold off all it’s land left by it’s ancestors.”

On the same day, the CASS released questionnaire results.

It is the first nationwide poll on citizens political awareness.

The report claims that among 6,159 respondents

from 10 Provinces, nearly 70% of them say they

embrace the CCP, and its current political system.

Zhu Jianguo, Columnist, China: “The

CASS itself is one of the CCP mouthpieces.

Now the CCP has argued against constitutionalism.

It has promoted for people to have confidence

for its road, ideology and political system.

In this context, it’s no surprise that the poll was

conducted to be in favor of the CCP’s wishes.”

Zhu Jianguo explains that nowadays, surveys are

commonly graded on a 0-to-100 scale, due to precision.

The previous 5-point grading scale has been abolished,

but it was still used in this CASS questionnaire.

From this point, we can see the

CCP is timid, lacking confidence.

Some scholars indicate that the survey

was released to serve as propaganda.

It was conducted among selective respondents, instead

of ordinary citizens, petitioners or persecuted groups.

Chen Yongmiao: “Before Saddam was

toppled, he always won 100% of the votes.”

In November 2012, the 18th CCP Congress

report called on all the party members

to adhere to the ‘Three Confidences’.

That is, to have confidence in taking the CCP

path, in it’s ideology and in it’s political system.

Since then, overwhelmingly, CCP official media

has attacked the ideas of constitutionalism.

Official media have made it clear that the “China

Dream" is founded on CCP one-party rule.

Recently, many street advertising boards promoting

socialism, and the CCP, have appeared nationwide.

Some netizens have complained that this seems

to be reviving the era of the ‘Cultural Revolution’.

Chen Yongmiao: “Currently, high-level CCP

officials, and those in charge of CCP ideology

and propaganda, are mired in self-deception.”

Chen Yongmiao notes that so far, the

CCP has lost its soul in propaganda.

What is its real belief? The CCP

itself doesn’t know anymore.

Chen Yongmiao:

“A story goes that in ancient China, Xi Shi’s beauty

and Dong Shi’s ugliness could in no way compare.

Dong Shi tried to use make-up to draw eyebrows like

Xi Shi, and thought she could be as beautiful as Xi Shi.

Similarly, there may exist superficial similarities

between the ‘China dream’ and the ‘American

dream’, but the CCP nevertheless remains ugly.”

Chen Yongmiao also stresses that

the CASS is a state run organization.

It cannot conduct objective surveys.

According to Chen, survey results released

under the name of the CASS are unreliable.

相關文章