【新唐人2013年05月02日訊】日前，香港立法會否決特首梁振英提出:就四川雅安地震捐款1億港元的動議，引起中共不滿。中共喉舌《人民日報》海外版及香港媒體發表評論文章，指責港人的「抗捐運動」，並將此事上升到政治高度，引起民間極大的反感和國際輿論關注。立法會議員黃毓民在會上指出，香港人「抗捐」是民意所向。他一番慷慨激昂的演講在網上瘋傳，位列新浪網視頻排行第一。

4月24號，黃毓民在港府立法會就「四川救援賑災基金諮詢會」上的發言，被大陸網民叫好，網民說:「這才是人民的議員」。

黃毓民：「司長。你有眼去見，有耳去聽。五年前，我到街上籌款，三天50萬。那時「社民聯」成立不久，我站在西洋菜街籌款，三天50萬，親手送去香港紅十字會。今時今日，你看看，香港紅十字會三天只籌得500萬，五年前三天就有5600萬，你以為大家都是瞎了嗎？」

黃毓民指出，港人拒絕捐款的原因，是因為不信任大陸貪官。過去的捐款都去向不明。

黃毓民：「非常簡單的道理，就是不相信（中國紅十字）！現在是連你也不信了嘛，林鄭月娥。上次那90億去了哪裏了？你說那不是賑災基金，我也早就知道了，但那是給了他們蓋學校蓋房子的，是不是？用到哪裏去了？光是看這份文件，用於甘肅省泥石流的那筆錢，說是用來建一所社會福利院，（現在）在哪裏？瞎扯，將我們的公帑這樣（亂）用。」

黃毓民直接指出，一億，是親共港府向共產黨表達效忠的，他還稱呼港府是特共政府。

湖北宜昌工程監理劉家財說，看到黃毓民的演講，他深表贊成。

湖北宜昌工程監理劉家財：「你捐的越多，被他們貪得越多。我反對捐款。因為他所有的捐款，他沒有一個帳，他不透明，所有的開支不透明。以前地震，我還很熱情。最後發現不是那麼回事。 」

香港《大公報》4月26號發表評論，指責香港人「抗捐」是反中央、反民族。官方媒體《人民日報》海外版也發表批評性評論文章，題為「少數港人抵制賑災捐款—-他們的理由站得住腳嗎？」

劉家財表示，港人抗捐的理由很充分。

劉家財：「首先我捐這個款，我要知道用到哪裏去了？比方說重建項目，這個項目的質量又怎麼樣？比方說，這個項目我投資了兩千萬，蓋了一棟學校，結果他的質量是豆腐渣工程，實際上根本不需要投入那麼多錢。因為他偷工減料了。這一部分錢被一些私人老闆和政府官員相互勾結，把這筆錢吃了回扣了。 」

山東某大學教師郭全芳表示，她也看了黃毓民的演講，她支持港人不捐款。她說，她自己也沒捐。往年單位直接從工資裡面扣，這一次改為自願行為。

山東某大學教師郭全芳：「因為他現在，你捐的錢不是到了災民手頭上，而是貪官吃了、喝了、嫖了。災區有一個災民叫張敏歲的，他感謝全國人民的熱心，他說不要捐錢，因為他們領救災物品，還要交100元的交通費。 」

郭全芳表示，本來慈善是一個很好的事情。中國人經常說，一方有難，八方支援。如果官府真正把每一分錢都用到災民身上，民眾捐多少都沒有怨言。

《法國國際廣播電臺》評論說，公民無償獻血，被機構拿去賣給病人；建個中華脊髓庫，問公民收取每次500元的檢查費，病人想要得到骨髓，還要再交至少5萬元。諸如此類的行為，意在藉機斂財，大發國難財，鯨吞公民所捐善款，這才是真正的反中央、反國家、反民族。

採訪編輯/秦雪 後製/葛雷

Hong Kong Council Member’s “Anti-donation" Speech

Recently, the Hong Kong Legislative Council rejected

Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying’s motion to raise

100 million yuan for the Ya’an earthquake disaster.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mouthpiece

People’s Daily published an article on overseas editions and Hong Kong media,

accusing the Hong Kong people of

an “anti-donation” movement.

This issue has risen to the political heights, causing great

resentment from the public, attracting international attention.

Legislative Council member Wong Yuk-man pointed out

at the meeting that it was following public opinion.

His impassioned speech has been widely spread online

with the video ranked first on Sina Net.

On April 24th, Wong Yuk-man spoke in the council meeting

regarding the Sichuan Disaster Relief Funds.

He was applauded by Mainland netizens.

They called him a real people’s council member.

[Video]Wong Yuk-man: “Secretary of Justice,

you have eyes and ears, so you can see and hear.

Five years ago, I was on the street to collect donations.

Within 3 days, I received 500,000 and sent it to the Red Cross.

Today, the Hong Kong Red Cross collected

only 5 million in 3 days.

That would have been 56 million in 2008.

Do you really think that everyone is blind?”

Wong Yuk-man pointed out that Hong Kong people

refuse to donate money because they do not trust corrupt officials in the Mainland.

What has happened to the money raised in the past?

[Video] Wong Yuk-man: “a very simple reason,

we don’t trust the China Red Cross.

Now, we can’t even trust you. Mrs. Lam

where is the 9 billion we raised last time?

You say that was a Disaster Relief Fund, and I know that too.

That money was to build them a school. Where did it go?

Just look at this document, there was money to build a

social welfare institute, after the mud slide in Gansu Province.

Where is the institute now?

Is that how our public funds are being used?”

Wong Yuk-man said that one hundred million

is a Pro-CCP gesture.

He even called the Hong Kong government

the CCP’s special agent.

Liu Jiacai, Hubei engineering supervisor,

was moved by Wong’s speech.

Liu Jiacai: “The more you donate,

the more they take in. I oppose donations.

They do not have an account,

and they are not transparent.

I used to be quite enthusiastic about donating

money to earthquakes, but not anymore.”

On April 26th, the Hong Kong Ta Kung Bao

published an article, saying that

refusing to donate is both anti-central government

and anti-nation.

Official media, People’s Daily, overseas edition

also published a critical review article,

“A few Hong Kong people resist disaster relief donations

— are their reasons tenable? “

Liu Jiacai said that Hong Kong people have

a good reason to refuse to donate.

Liu Jiacai: “First, if I donate the money,

I want to know where this money goes.

For example, it goes to rebuilding.

But what kind of quality in construction?

If I invest 20 million yuan for a school,

actually it does not need that much.

Because the reconstruction is so shoddy,

they cut corners and accept kickbacks.

When private owners and officials collude

with each other, the money is gone.”

Guo Quanfang, instructor of Shandong University,

said that she watched Wong’s speech on video.

She supports the Hong Kong people’s actions.

She added that she did not donate either.

In the past, her work unit deducted money directly from

her paycheck. This year, it has changed to voluntary mode.

Guo Quanfang: “Your donation will not end up in victims’

hands. It is for officials to wine, dine, and entertain themselves.

One earthquake victim said he sincerely thanks

other people for their help.

He also said: “Don’t donate money– because victims

are even being charged 100 yuan transportation fee.”

Guo Quanfang commented that basically,

charity is a good thing.

Chinese people often say, when one person has a difficult time,

people from eight different directions will come to help.

If officials will really give every penny to the victims,

people will not complain about donations.

Radio France Internationale commented that when citizens

donate their blood free, the institute sells the blood to patients.

The China’s spinal cord bank charges patients 500 yuan for a

checkup and at least 50,000 for a bone marrow transplant.

Actions that aim at making money,

building wealth on others’ sufferings,

and robbing victims of their disaster relief funds

are true reflections of anti-central government, anti-state, and anti-nation.