【新唐人2013年03月01日訊】大陸媒體《每日經濟新聞》發表長篇調查文章，抨擊互聯網安全軟件與服務公司「奇虎360」，是中國互聯網行業的「惡性雜草」和「癌性基因」，由於「360」通過綁架用戶，強制用戶做決定，對整個互聯網社會形成強大破壞力。中國一名互聯網專家表示，他對中國所有的互聯網產品都感到不安全，因此一律不用，搜索引擎也不惜「翻牆使用谷歌」。
《每日經濟新聞》2月26號的文章說，「360」完全違背了安全廠商的基本準則。當「360安全衛士」軟件、和「360安全瀏覽器」植入用戶電腦的時候，「360」便在用戶知情或不知情的情況下，通過它們直接代替用戶做決定，完成各種動作。
文章說，「360」有兩條所謂的「成功密鑰」，第一，是以「民事訴訟8連敗」為代表的發展模式:就是先踩法律底線，以求先發展——在中國，「360」鑽了品牌與道德成本太低的空子﹔第二，就是以安全和免費名義「綁架」用戶，然後以安全裁判員的身份，展開「競爭」。
曾經擔任全球互聯網服務公司「雅虎中國」總經理的謝文表示，「360」的商業模式或服務模式的確存在問題。
前雅虎中國總經理謝文：「我能感覺到它的比如像捆綁推廣，強制下載，未經用戶同意，就改變你的設置，所以我上過幾次，我都卸載了。這是他一脈相承下來的風格。把產品、把服務統統綁在一起。然後或明或暗、不太公正，強行推廣、強行打擊競爭對手的方式。我個人認為是不對的。」
「中國人民大學」行政學系教授毛壽龍表示，他也時常耳聞用戶對「360」軟件的不滿。
中國人民大學教授毛壽龍：「有時候就強制性下載，下載防病毒軟件之後，其他很多軟件就不太好用了。據說有這樣的東西。」
《每日經濟新聞》指稱，「360」兩年前開始佈局電子商務安全領域，最先打出的所謂「安全產品」，是360瀏覽器主推的「綠色網站認證」。宣稱，「360綠色網站認證」可以確保用戶使用「網銀」以及電子商務的交易安全。
那麼，「360」是否真的具備能力取代「網銀」服務提供者的身份驗證體系，由自身來充當網銀的「保鏢」呢？
《每日經濟新聞》驚呼，一旦360大規模啟動「各大電商推薦安全購物使用360瀏覽器」活動，人們的網上購物都得依賴於「360綠色網站認證」，中國的「網銀」體系又將面臨怎樣的可怕變局？
前雅虎中國總經理謝文：「為了所謂占有率，有的時候根本不給你打招呼，就把甚麼輸入法，甚麼瀏覽器給你下載了。然後讓自動給你設置成默認，結果你就不得不用了。這種有點強迫性質、強姦性質的推廣，我是非常反感的。所以我就不用。」
此外，謝文表示，「360」還可能記錄用戶的行為，然後推送廣告，甚至用戶在自己機器上的全部行為都被記錄。
前雅虎中國總經理謝文：「我乾脆就迴避了，我都不用就算了。這是一種心理感覺。就跟北京大氣污染一樣，你說這個污染嚴重到甚麼程度也不一定好說。但是你看這霧濛濛的天，你就感覺一種心理威脅。沒有條件，你沒有辦法，你只好有忍著，有替代物，幹同樣的事情有其他更可信一些公司的產品，為甚麼不用好東西呢？」
謝文說，搜索引擎他也堅持只用「谷歌」，哪怕需要「翻牆」。
「奇虎360」於2月26號對外發佈聲明說，將起訴《每日經濟新聞》報社，指稱報社在未經採訪「360公司」的情況下，污蔑360旗下多個產品的安全性，嚴重損害了公司和產品的商譽。
但《每日經濟新聞》報社一名工作人員表示，目前並未收到相關的法律文件。
採訪編輯/秦雪 後製/陳建銘
Media Denounce 360, Chinese Netizens Use Google as Search Engine Even if it Means Breaking Through the Firewall
Chinese media outlet Daily Economic News published
a lengthy survey report denouncing Internet security software provider and
service company Qihoo 360 as a vicious weed and
malignant gene of China’s Internet industry.
According to the report, 360 kidnaps and makes decisions
for its users, and has formed a big destructive force in the Internet society.
A Chinese Internet expert said that he feels all Chinese
Internet products aren’t safe, so he doesn’t use any.
As for a search engine, he prefers to break through
the firewall and use Google.
Daily Economic News published an article on February 26
in which it condemned 360 as running completely contrary to the industry standard of security suppliers.
When users use 360’s safety guard and 360’s Internet
browser software, 360 will make decisions and act on behalf of their users without informing them.
The article said that 360 has two so-called secret
successful keys.
The first one is the enterprise touched the law’s
bottom line to make space for the development.
360 took advantage of the low morals and cost
of the brand.
The second is under the banner of being safe and free
of charge,
they “kidnap” users, then pretend to be a safety referee
to compete with competitors.
Xie Wen, the former general manager of an international
Internet service company, Yahoo China, said the business mode of 360 indeed has problems.
Xie Wen, former Yahoo China GM: ”I can feel it uses
bundled advertisements and forced downloads,
as well as changes users’ setting without informing them,
among other things .
I was cheated by it several times, then I uninstalled it.
This is its strained style that combines the products
and services, and then forcefully promotes and attacks competitors publicly or by unjust means.
I personally think it’s wrong.”
Mao Shoulong, an administrative science professor from
Renmin University of China, said that he hears frequent user complaints about 360 software.
Mao Shoulong: “Sometimes, (360) downloads
are mandatory.
After the anti-virus software has been downloaded,
many other software can’t work properly. I heard such things.”
Daily Economic News alleged that 360 started to layout
its products two years ago.
Its first action promoted its so-called security product,
“green nets’ certification, on its 360 internet browser.
It said green nets’ certification guarantees safety
when users use online banking and e-business trading.
Well, can 360 really can replace the ID authentication
system that online banking service provided?
Can it be the bodyguard of online banking?
Once 360’s large-scale launch, “all the major electricity
suppliers recommend 360 browser for online shopping,” Daily Economic News exclaimed.
People had to rely on “360 green nets’ certification”
for online shopping, then how can the online banking systems face the terrible situation?
Xie Wen: “For the so-called share, sometimes it didn’t
inform you but installed the input method browsers
and so on, as well as set those software as
the default in your system. Then you have to use these.
This is a kind of forced and raped promotion,
which I find very disgusting. So, I don’t use it.”
In addition, Xie Wen said 360 may also record
users’ actions and then promote its advertisements to them.
It even records all the actions of the users
while they use their computer.
Xie Wen: “I simply avoid. I simply don’t use it.
This is a psychological feeling. It’s like the air pollution in Beijing.
You don’t know the level the pollution has reached,
but when you look at the hazy, foggy sky, you feel the threat in your heart.
If you have no other choice, you have to endure it.
But if there’s another product supplied by a more credible
company and has the same function, why don’t you use it?”
Xie Wen said even Google is blocked by the Chinese Internet
firewall, but he insists on breaking through the wall and using Google as his search engine.
Qihoo 360 published a statement on February 26 saying that
it will sue Daily Economic News.
It said the news agency slandered the security of 360
products without interviewing the 360 company.
It hurt the reputation of the company and its products.
However, a staff member of Daily Economic News said
the news agency hasn’t received any legal documents so far.