【新唐人2012年11月23日訊】被勞教的重慶大學生「村官」任建宇被提前釋放。19號，重慶市勞教委以「當初處理不當」的理由，撤銷了原勞教決定。當天，任建宇重獲自由。20號，他就跟隨律師上庭聽取他「起訴勞教委」的宣判，結果法庭以「上訴期限已過」駁回起訴。
25歲的青年任建宇，原是重慶市彭水縣的大學生「村官」，由於表現優秀，去年2011年重慶市從「村官」中選拔公務員時，任建宇順利通過。不過，就在他公務員轉正公示的第一天—-去年8月18號，他從辦公室被警察帶走。
重慶市勞教委認定：任建宇在網上發表或轉帖了100多條所謂「不良言論」。當年9月23號，他被勞教兩年。當時重慶「唱紅打黑」正處於熱潮，國內輿論和律師界普遍認為任建宇案屬於典型的「因言獲罪」。
彭水警方收集有關任建宇所謂「煽動顛覆國家政權」的證據，包括：「重慶扛起了中國第二次文化大革命的大旗：唱紅歌，大躍進，浮誇風，個人崇拜，蔑視法律。一切都那麼像。拿甚麼拯救你，苦難的公民！」以及：「政府所說的『萬元增收』等政績是亂說的，是浮誇風，唱紅歌浪費大量的錢，人民根本沒有得到真正的實惠。」
《光明網》22號評論說，現在看來，任建宇對薄熙來治下的重慶，描寫的真是準確而又到位。只不過，任建宇的話，無論從哪個角度講，都構不成「煽動顛覆國家政權」。並且恰恰相反，正是薄熙來的所作所為，正是薄熙來一手遮天下的「文革」式專政，於公民、於社會、於國家才更具有切切實實的危害性。
在任建宇出獄的第二天，許多「難友」趕來跟他一起上法庭聽取宣判，他們曾經一起被勞教，現在有的人已經洗刷冤屈，有的還在為尋回清白而努力。這其中包括方洪，他曾經因「一坨屎」案被勞教，後來申訴成功，撤銷勞教﹔另外一位叫彭洪，因為轉發漫畫，被勞教，後來申訴成功﹔謝蘇明，也因為跟帖，被勞教，後來申訴成功。
《光明網》評論說，重慶市勞教委有必要向公眾交待清楚的是，重慶市在薄熙來「造神」的幾年裡，究竟勞教了多少人？在重慶的勞教場所，現在還有多少仍因此而身陷囹圄的人？重慶市勞教委對這些在顯失公正情況下而被勞教的公民，甄別、撤銷了多少勞教決定，又為此賠償了多少人？
在薄熙來權控重慶的時候，重慶市公安局長王立軍好似薄熙來的家丁，任由薄熙來家人呼來喚去，「緊跟」「照辦」。但是《光明網》提出一個令人不解的問題：在薄熙來已經被移送到司法機關處理、離開重慶已經8個月，而且，他的治理手段已經被明確否定的情況下，重慶市勞教委為甚麼還在堅持那些錯誤的決定而堅不改正，為甚麼還要為王立軍破壞法治的「鐵腕」專政「背書」？
據任建宇律師浦志強的《談話筆錄》，10月18號下午，重慶第三中級法院對任建宇說，希望他和重慶勞教委雙方面談，官司算任建宇贏了，「法官還說，如直接判他們（勞教委）輸，勞教委面子過不去」。
11月22號下午，任建宇連同司法部法治研究室原主任王公義，以及全國人大代表、黑龍江齊齊哈爾市「夙生律師事務所」主任遲夙生做客《強國論壇》，他們和網友在網上進行交流，題目是「從任建宇案看勞教制度改革」。王公義表示，勞教委實際是公安部門操作，沒有嚴格的司法程序，強調了效率，忽略了公平。
編輯/秦雪 後製/肖顏
University Student “Village Official” Released from Labor Camp
Ren Jianyu, Chongqing university student “village official”
was released earlier from the labor camp.
On Nov. 19th, Chongqing labor camp revoked the original
decision using the excuse “mishandling the case”.
That same day, Ren regained his freedom. On Nov. 20th he
went to court with his lawyer.
The court rejected his “suing the labor camp”
claiming that the “appeal period has expired”.
The 25-year-old man, Ren Jianyu, was the university
student ‘village official’ of Chongqing Bongshui County.
Because of his excellent performance in 2011, he passed
the selection of civil servants for 『village official』.
However, on 8th August the first day that his civil servant’s
identification was released, he was taken away by police.
Chongqing Labor Camp Commission details: Ren published
and forwarded more than 100 so-called 『bad words』 on the web.
On Sept. 23rd 2011, he was reeducated for two years in the
labor camp.
At that time, Chongqing was at the height of the Chongqing
hitting.
Domestic public opinion and the lawyers generally
considered Ren’s case is a typical “sentence for speech”.
Pengshui County police gathered much so-called evidence of
“inciting subversion of state power’ evidence that Ren spread.
The evidence included the following words:
“Chongqing has taken up the second Culture Revolution,
sing party songs, great leap, exaggerating,
cult of personality, contempt for the law.
What can I use to save you, suffering citizens!
The government is exaggerating about the million income.
They wasted a lot of money in singing the party songs.
The ordinary people did not get the real benefits at all.”
『Guang Ming』 commented on the 22nd that Ren’s description
about Chongqing under Bo Xilai’s rule is accurate and exact.
No matter from which angle, Ren’s speech cannot reach
“inciting subversion of state power”.
However, it is Bo’s actions and Culture Revolution-style
Dictatorship, which have harmed citizens, society and state.
On the next day after Ren was released, many ‘fellows’
came to the court with him. They were in the same labor camp.
Some of them have 『washed their grievances』.
Some are still trying to recover their former good name.
Fang Hong is one of them, he was reeducated for using
“a piece of shit’ and had this overturned on successful appeal.
Another one is called Peng Hong, reeducated for forwarding
comics, then the following appeal succeed.
Xie Suming, reeducated for following comments
in internet forum, appeal succeed as well.
Guang Ming said that Chongqing Labor Camp Commission
should reveal how many people were put in the labor camp during Bo Xilai』s the movement of “creating the gods”.
In the Chongqing labor camps, how many people
are still behind bars?
Chongqing Labor Camp Commission has revoked how
many unfair cases, compensated how many people?”
When Bo is ruling Chongqing, Public Security Director Wang
Lijun was willing to fulfill and follow any commands.
But Guang Ming brought up a question: Bo has been transferred
to judicial departments and left Chongqing for 8 months.
His way of governance was been explicitly rejected.
Why did the Chongqing Labor Camp Commission
not correct these wrong decisions?
Ren’s lawyer said Pu Zhiqiang’s “conversation transcript”
from Oct. 18th showed Third Intermediate People’s Court
of Chongqing told Ren that they hoped he can talk with the
Labor Camp Commission.
Ren won the lawsuit count. The judge said if they were
sentence (Labor Camp Commission) directly, they will lose face.
On 22nd, Ren, Wang Gongyi, former director of law-study
department Ministry of Justice, and Chi Sucheng, deputy of
the National People’s Congress, Heilongjiang Qiqihar City
Susheng Law Firm director, joined “Strong Nation Forum”.
They communicated with netizens on the internet, the title is
“From Ren Jianyu’s case see reform of the labor camp system”.
Wang Gongyi said the Labor Camp Commission is actually
operated by the Public Security Bureau.
They have no strict judicial proceedings, stressing efficiency
while ignoring justice.