【新唐人2012年8月21日訊】希臘等歐盟國家發生歐債危機至今，中國資本加速翻倍的對歐洲國家展開投資。就投資策略來說，這不失為一個利機。但，與此同時，外界擔心長此下去，歐洲經濟會過於依賴中國，而中共背後卻隱藏著其他動機。
《法國國際廣播電臺》引用法國地緣政治學博士皮埃爾•比卡爾的文章說，據並不完全的統計數字，最近三年來，中國對外投資中，對歐洲的比例，從原先的百分之二上升到百分之十。除了德國和英國，中國在荷蘭、比利時、希臘以及東歐的投資也不斷攀升。投資標的多為各國各自的強項。
這篇題為「中國如何利用危機購買歐洲的企業」文章中還說，儘管中國在歐洲的投資專案中，成功的案例就目前而言幾乎屈指可數，但，這僅僅是個開始。
「北京大學經濟學院」教授夏業良指出，從過去幾十年的經驗觀察，中共對外的投資基本上沒有多少收益。
「北京大學經濟學院」教授 夏業良：「虧本、破產啊，這種情況比比皆是。所以很難說中國這個投資完全出於經濟目地，就是很大的情況下，他們的投資都帶有很強的政治目地，就是說，希望能夠強化中國在歐洲的影響，也希望通過投資能夠對有些領域、對（當地）政府、甚至對老百姓，產生一種心理上的一種影響。」
中共總理溫家寶去年在「第五屆夏季達沃斯論壇」上聲稱，中國至今相信歐洲經濟能夠克服困難，中國仍然願意擴大對歐洲的投資。
與此同時，中國企業正試圖投資或收購歐洲各國基建、技術和名牌商品。
中國資金為歐洲帶來就業機會，刺激歐洲的經濟增長，但輿論界對此越來越感到質疑。
美「南卡羅萊納大學艾肯商學院」教授 謝田：「中國的資本老有這個問題，就是說，有很多西方人是分不清這到底是民間的資本﹔還是國家的資本，是不是有中共政權在背後。如果有中共政權在背後，他們就擔心會有政治上的因素，政治上的目地在背後，所以，他就會有所顧慮。」
皮埃爾•比卡爾認為，中國的投資可以拯救歐洲瀕臨倒閉的企業，也避免職工陷入失業的處境。而中共總理溫家寶也表示，中國願意擴大對歐洲投資的同時，也表態，希望歐洲一些主要國家的領導人，承認中國完全市場經濟地位。
夏業良：「中國現在老是用國家作為主體，來取代企業和個人去投資，那這樣的做法實際上就是一種把資源壟斷，然後更加突顯它的國家主義的取向，不是搞市場經濟的做法。」
除此之外，美國「南卡羅萊納大學艾肯商學院」教授謝田指出，中共更希望獲得歐洲的軍事科技，放鬆歐洲軍火對中國出口的限制。
謝田：「還一點就是，中共在國際上飽受人權的壓力，就是西歐各國對中共的人權上去批評，它認為希望透過投資來緩解壓力，所以，中共確實是在賺錢的目地之後，有其他背後的隱藏的動機在裡面。但是，西方人也不是不知道，所以實際上，真正高科技的軍火東西，他也不賣給中共。」
報導還說，雖然歐洲各國的政界和企業界，對中國的投資作出熱情的回應，但外界擔心，長此下去，歐洲經濟會過於依賴中國。
謝田：「真正要影響，就是操控歐洲的經濟，這還差得很遠很遠。雖然對中國來說，這是佔中國對外投資很大的一部分，但實際上總數來說，那還是非常非常少。它還遠遠不到日本的資本或南韓的資本對歐洲投資的那個規模。」
謝田指出，中國的資本流向歐洲，也說明中國的投資環境正在急劇的惡化。
採訪編輯/梁欣 後製/蕭宇
Suspicion Over Influx of Chinese Investment in Europe During Debt Crisis.
SInce Greece and other EU countries faced debt crisis,
Chinese capital invested has doubled in European countries.
In terms of investment strategies,
this would be a favorable opportunity.
However, at the same time, overseas media fear
that if this continues, the European economy could become too dependent on China.
Other motives could become hidden
behind the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
“Radio France Internationale" reported in an article
by Dr. Pierre Bikar that according to incomplete statistics,
in the last three years, Chinese foreign investment
in Europe has risen from two percent to ten percent.
In addition to Germany and the United Kingdom,
investment in the Netherlands, Belgium, Greece, and Eastern Europe is growing.
The investment targets almost reflect
the respective strengths of each country.
The article, entitled “how to take advantage
of the crisis to buy European enterprises" also said
that in the opinion of Chinese investment professionals
in Europe, you should buy now.
There are only a few success cases to date,
but this is just the beginning, it said.
Xia Yeliang, a professor at the School of Economics
at Peking University commented.
In observing the past few decades, CCP foreign
investments have brought little return in revenue.
Xia Yeliang: “Loss and bankruptcy
cases can be found everywhere.
So it is hard to say that these kind of Chinese
investments are entirely for economic purposes.
In many cases, these investments
are with strong political purpose.
The CCP doesn’t only wants to be able
to strengthen China’s influence in Europe.
It also hope that by their investing in some areas
of the (local) government, or even in people, it can produce a psychological impact.”
Last year, at the 5th Summer Davos Forum,
CCP Premier Wen Jiabao claimed that
Chinese believed that so far, investing in the European
economy would overcome the financial difficulties.
China was still willing to expand investment in Europe.
At the same time, Chinese companies are trying
to invest in or acquire European infrastructure, technology and brand-name goods.
Chinese capital has created employment opportunities.
It has stimulated economic growth for Europe,
but media are starting to question this more and more.
Prof. Xie Tian, University of South Carolina Aiken Business
School, U.S.: “China’s capital always has this problem.
In other words, there are many Westerners who,
in the end, cannot tell the difference between
private sector capital and the country’s capital,
or whether the Chinese Communist regime is behind it.
If the Chinese Communist regime was behind it,
they are worried that it has political motivations.
So, they would have concerns.”
Pierre Bikar thinks that Chinese investment will not only
save European enterprises from the brink of collapse.
It will also help workers avoid unemployment.
CCP Premier Wen Jiabao said that China
is willing to expand its European investment.
At the same time, it also hopes the leaders
of some major European countries recognize China’s full market economy status.
Professor Xia Yeliang: “The CCP always now
uses the Chinese state as the main body investment.
This is instead of businesses and individuals.
Actually, it is a resource monopoly, giving more
prominence to its nationalist orientation.
It does not engage in the practices of a full market economy.
In addition, Professor Xie Tian highlights that the CCP
hopes to obtain military technology from Europe.
It has relaxed restrictions in exporting
arms from Europe to China.
Xie Tian: “The point is that the CCP is under pressure
from the international community for it’s human rights.
The countries of Western Europe
are critical of the CCP’s human rights.
The CCP diverts this pressure through economic investment.
Therefore, the CCP certainly has other hidden
motives behind it, aside from making money.
However, Westerners actually know this,
so it won’t sell it’s real high-tech arms to the CCP.”
The report also said that European political and the business
circles made enthusiastic responses towards the investment.
But international media fear that the European economy
will become too dependent on China longer term.
Xie Tian: “The CCP is not yet at the point of truly
influencing or manipulating the European economy.
As far as China is concerned, this is a large
part of total foreign investment from China.
But in fact, its total amount is very, very small.
The scale is also far less than the capital investment
of Japan or South Korea in Europe.”
Xie Tian points out that China’s capital flowed to Europe,
which also demonstrated that China’s investment environment is being sharply deteriorated.