【新唐人2012年8月3日訊】中共「八一」前夕，中共國防部長梁光烈再次強調要堅持「黨對軍隊絕對領導的根本原則和制度」。同一天，在中共事先設定的新聞發佈會上，總政辦公廳官員表示，軍方堅決反對「軍隊國家化」。評論人士認為，這正好說明中國現在民怨很大、軍心難攏，中共非常擔心一旦發生內戰時，軍隊會把槍口調轉。
7月的最後一天，中共在北京舉行的會議很多，其中一個是中共國務院新聞辦為軍方舉辦的新聞發佈會。在發佈會上，解放軍總政辦公廳政研室副主任王永勝在回答香港記者的提問時說，因為「軍隊是共產黨的」，所以要反對「軍隊國家化。」
時事評論員文昭指出，在軍隊裡面一直都有部分思想比較進步的軍人，他們擁護「軍隊國家化」，他們並不願意讓軍隊成為「黨衛軍」，所謂的「黨指揮槍」，所以這種對中共的威脅，也是一直存在的。
時事評論員 文昭：「它們想建立起一個所謂的共產黨民主，和領袖獨裁之間的一種中間模式，就是，它是一種寡頭分享權力的方式，同時，它在權力體制內部，想建立起一個『相對制度化』的一個權力運行的環境，那整個這個嚐試來講，它是失敗的。」
根據《維基百科》有關「軍隊國家化」等詞條的解釋，軍隊不得成為黨派或私人干涉和影響國內政治的工具，也就是不得以槍桿子保衛政黨或政權。
「公民力量」發起人楊建利表示，當共產黨特別的強調某一件事情的時候，就說明在那件事情上可能要出事了。
「公民力量」發起人 楊建利：「現在中國（共）的政局也很不穩，各地的抗議活動此起彼伏，可以說幾分鍾就有一起很大的抗議活動，整個人心不穩，軍心不穩，才造成它每當有一個機會，就強調黨對軍隊的絕對領導，軍隊對於黨的效忠。」
今年中共「兩會」前夕曾經一度傳出，解放軍副總參謀長章沁生就因為主張「軍隊國家化」而被停職。雖然章沁生後來在「兩會」上有公開露面，但是，當被記者問到外界傳聞的真實性時，章沁生卻表示，這些事不要說了！
大陸一位經常和部隊有聯繫的知情人士告訴《新唐人》，現在軍心相當不穩定。
大陸知情人士：「通過薄熙來事件把所有東西該曝光的都給曝光，現在來講，不管在哪個級別上，現在開始醒悟，以前覺得黨指揮槍，這不是黨一直所倡的嗎？這是黨的軍人嗎？現在都不這麼想了。都深刻的去反省黨指揮槍這個問題。」
這名知情人士透露，在軍隊裡面有兩種人，兩種想法。一個是軍隊的高層要「軍隊國家化」，另外一個就是，黨的部隊、基層已經徹底的喪失了戰鬥力。因為，低層從士官開始，到了少尉，一直到政委，每一個級別都是拿錢買來的。因此，軍隊絕對不會為某一個使命而去戰鬥。
楊建利：「我覺得中國的軍方再做像『六四』那樣的事情，可能性也非常小了，因為軍方已經沒有一個像鄧小平那樣能有絕對權威唬軍隊的人，第二，軍隊人心也比較渙散，下層的軍人實際上和農民的利益是完全一致的，和下層老百姓的利益完全一致的，中國高層、精英階層、權力階層，繼續用盤剝老百姓的辦法來維持自己的政權的話，會引起軍人的不滿。」
《法國國際廣播電臺》報導，中國廣東以及湖南等地的朝鮮戰爭以及越戰的老兵，幾年來多次通過網絡組織示威遊行活動。為此，中共當局在「八一」前夕關閉了中國國內最大的退伍軍人聯誼網站「軍魂網」。
採訪/梁欣 編輯/唐睿 後製/薛莉
CCP Fears Muzzle Will Be Turned Onto It:
Bans “Civilian Control of the Military”.
Before August 1, Liang Guanglie, Chinese Minister
of Defense, emphasized again that
“it should be a fundamental principle and rule that the
Party should absolutely control the military”.
On the same day, an official from the general office
of the General Political Department spoke in a press conference.
They stated that the Military firmly
opposed “civilian control of the military”.
Commentators believed that it shows
public grievances are very large.
The military is hard to control. The Chinese Communist
Party worries that the military will turn to control it.
On the last day of July, the Chinese Communist Party
(CCP) organized many meetings in Beijing.
One was a press conference arranged
by the State Council for the military.
At the conference, Wang Yongsheng, deputy director
of the general office of the General Political Department answered a question from a Hong Kong reporter.
He said that people must be against “civilian control
of the military,” because the military belongs to the CCP.
Wen Zhao, current affairs’ commentator, pointed out that
there’s always a number of officers within the military who have more advanced opinions.
They support “civilian control of the military”.
They don’t want the military to be like the Nazi SS,
and don’t want “the party to command the gun.”
For the CCP, it’s a threat that always existed.
Wen Zhao: “They want to build a so-called communist
democracy, which is different from a dictatorship.
It’s a model where a few people share power.
At the same time, they want to build a related institution
to operate the change of power. But overall, it has failed.”
According to the Wikipedia interpretation of
the description “civilian control of the military,”
the military cannot be a tool that supports a party or person
and interfere or impact domestic policies.
This also means the gun should not be used
to defend a political party or regime.
Yang Jianli, founder of “Civil Power” said that when
the CCP emphasizes an idea in high-profile, it means there will be an incident related to that thing.
Yang Jianli: “Now the political situation isn’t stable in China.
Protests have been occurring one by one all around China.
We can say a large protest in China
takes place every few minutes.
The public aren’t stable, and the military isn’t stable.
This is the reason why the CCP emphasizes that it absolutely
controls the military, and that the military has the loyalty to the party in all circumstances.”
Just before the CCP’s two sessions this year, it’s said that
Zhang Qinsheng, former deputy chief of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), was deposed.
This was because he advocated
“civilian control of the military”.
Although this happened to Zhang Qinsheng,
he answered with “don’t talk about this topic” when he was questioned by reporters.
A insider who has frequent contact with NTD
stated that the military isn’t stable now.
Insider: “Bo Xilai’s case exposed all the dark things.
Now, no matter which level they are at,
all the military has started to wake up.
Before, they thought that the party commanded the gun,
they were advocated by the party, and it was correct because they are the military.
Now they’re mindset is changing, and they are thinking
over whether the party should command the gun or not.”
The insider also said that, there are two types
of people within the military, with differing opinions.
One is the senior leadership of the military
who ask for “civilian control of the military”.
The other is that the military has lost
its combat effectiveness completely.
Each level within the military, from the low level solider,
through second lieutenant, up to the political commissar, can be bought by money.
That’s the reason why the military
cannot fight for a certain mission.
Yang Jianli: “I think there is less opportunity
for the Chinese military to take actions like 『June 4th』.
This is because the military don’t have a leader like
Deng Xiaoping, who has the absolute power over the military.
The second reason is that the opinion of the military is lax.
In fact, low level’s soldiers have the same interests
as the farmers and other people who live at low level society.
If the senior level tries to maintain their stability in power
by taking local people’s belongings, it dissatisfies soldiers.”
“Radio France International” reported that Chinese veterans
from Guangdong and Hunan province,
who participated in the Korean War and Vietnam War,
organized parades on line to demonstrate these activities.
To control it, the CCP banned and closed the China biggest
veteran friendship website 『Jun Hun Wang』 just before the 18th National Congress.