【新唐人2012年7月28日訊】26號中共喉舌媒體發佈了一條簡短的消息，中共前重慶市委書記薄熙來之妻谷開來涉嫌「殺人罪」，已經在安徽省合肥市被提起公訴。隨後這條消息被網友廣泛轉發。外界認為，在「北戴河會議」召開的同時，公訴谷開來，表明中共高層對薄熙來案件達成共識，不過，僅僅用刑事罪來起訴谷開來和處理薄案，說明中共還是為了延續它的統治在避重就輕。專家指出，薄熙來案錯綜複雜，如果不能順著薄案徹查江澤民、周永康等「血債派」，中國問題永遠解決不了。

薄谷開來、張小軍涉嫌故意殺人一案，今日由安徽省合肥市人民檢察院依法向合肥市中級人民法院提起公訴。中共中央今年4月宣佈立案調查薄熙來「嚴重違記問題」後，經3個多月，《新華社》26號晚報導，谷開來涉嫌毒殺英國商人海伍德，由安徽省合肥市人民檢察院向合肥市中級人民法院提起公訴。

美國「哥倫比亞大學」政治學博士李天笑認為，在這時處理谷開來案件，是為了在18大前處理薄熙來「投石問路」。

美國「哥倫比亞大學」政治學博士李天笑：「薄熙來這個案件牽一髮而動全身，跟所有的，比方說周永康還有『血債派』等等一脈相連，現在中共面臨的是用政治陰謀或者是用刑事罪來處理，或者是治罪薄熙來這個難題，這個情況下谷開來實際上拿出來做一個刑事案件來處理的話，相對對中共來說處理容易一些，也是在投石問路。」

美國「喬治梅森大學」教授章天亮也指出，如果只判薄熙來「包庇罪」的話，說明不了為甚麼會王立軍不去找他的上司周永康，而要叛逃美領館。

美國「喬治梅森大學」教授章天亮：「她當時殺人動機，就是因為向國外轉移資產，從而跟海伍德發生矛盾，那麼這個財產是從哪來的，那麼她貪腐的問題的話，還涉及到薄熙來的問題，薄熙來的問題決不僅是刑事案和貪腐案，否則的話，王立軍就不會跑到美領館。」

李天笑表示，為了減少對共產黨的震動，繼續維持它的統治，所以中共高層想在18大前用刑事案來處理薄熙來。

不過，章天亮認為，種種跡象表明中共已經「行將就木」，如果中共高層還想一廂情願的不想讓中共退出舞臺，會與中共一道遭到清算和審判。

章天亮：「這麼多年來迫害法輪功，包括周永康維穩的特點，已經把中共推到火山口上了，不公開處理周永康，讓他法辦，中國問題解決不了，把周永康的罪行揭露出來，他們主動的把共產黨這個權力結束掉，對他們自身的傷害最少，他們可能會得到人們的諒解和寬恕。」

中國維權律師浦志強說，如果對谷開來的指控不包括腐敗，也許意味著，也不會指控薄熙來腐敗。

同時，「中國公民監政會」發起人郭永豐也認為，中共高官人人都貪腐，因此沒辦法用貪腐罪來治薄熙來夫婦。

「中國公民監政會」發起人郭永豐：「腐敗不算犯罪了，搞紅色的宮廷政變，也不算犯罪了，現在它為了內部的和諧，只是針對他這個刑事案件，這也算它的一個統治手法，我不知道它這個黨所有的官員都殺了人的時候，再有甚麼樣的罪名。」

郭永豐說，其實中共很多官員也在殺人，只不過，薄熙來夫婦殺的是外國人。

另外，有許多網友在網路論壇上詢問，為何在重慶發生的殺人案，卻交由安徽合肥檢方調查起訴。

李天笑也表示，中共統治下司法不公，如果不是因為王立軍叛逃美領館，以及海伍德的死，薄熙來夫婦案件一輩子也不會曝光。

李天笑還說，谷開來說海伍德威脅到了薄瓜瓜的人身安全，是不是威脅到了，薄瓜瓜本人是否出庭做證，也會成為案件具體的看點。

採訪編輯/劉惠 後製/周天

With Public Prosecution of Gu Kailai, Bo Xilai Will Follow.

On July 26, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mouthpiece

media released a brief message about Gu Kailai.

Gu Kailai, wife of former CCP secretary of Chongqing

Bo Xilai, is suspected of homicide.

She has been publicly prosecuted in Hefei City, Anhui Province.

Later on, this message was forwarded widely by netizens.

International observers think that the public prosecution of Gu,

taking place at the same time as the Beidaihe meeting,

shows that CCP high officials reached a consensus on Bo.

However, by only using a criminal case to prosecute Gu

and to deal with Bo’s case,

it shows that the CCP still wants to extend its rule

with avoiding serious issues.

It focuses on small issues, and experts

point out that Bo’s case is very complex.

If the CCP cannot make use of Bo’s case and carry out

a thorough investigation of Jiang Zemin’s blood-debt faction, China’s problems will never be resolved.

In April this year, the CCP central committee announced that

it would investigate Bo’s “serious problems of violating discipline”.

On July 26, Xinhua News Agency reported that due to being

suspected of poisoning British businessman Neil Heywood,

Gu was publicly prosecuted by the People’s Procuratorate

in Hefei City in the Intermediate People’s Court, Anhui.

Li Tianxiao, doctor of political science

at Columbia University in the U.S., commented.

Currently, Gu’s case is being proceeded.

The CCP’s purpose is to test the waters for dealing

with Bo’s case before CCP 18th session.

Li Tianxiao: “As to Bo’s case, if one small part

is exposed, it will affect the whole situation.

It has tight links to all the blood-debt faction,

such as Zhou Yongkang.

At present, the CCP is faced with difficulty, of whether

to use political intrigue or a criminal offense to punish Bo.

In this situation, the CCP has taken

the route of a criminal case to deal with Gu.

Relatively speaking, it’s easier for the CCP to deal with it.

It is also for the CCP to test the waters to ask the way.”

Zhang Tianliang, professor at George Mason University

in the U.S., also commented.

If Bo is only sentenced with the crime of harboring,

it can’t explain why Wang Lijun didn’t go to his boss Zhou,

but instead escape to the U.S. Consulate.

Zhang Tianliang: “The motive of committing homicide

is to shift her assets to foreign countries.

This led to conflict with Heywood.

Then, where were the assets from?

And if she committed corruption,

it also related to Bo’s issue.

Bo’s actions are definitely not only

criminal cases and corruption case.

Otherwise, Wang Lijun would have not

escaped to the U.S. Consulate.”

Li Tianxiao said that, in order to reduce the reverberations

on the CCP and to continue to maintain its rule,

CCP high officials want to deal with Bos case

as a criminal case before the CCP 18th session.

However, Zhang Tianliang believes that

various indications show that CCP is dying.

If CCP high officials still wishfully not want to let

the CCP leave the stage, they will be disintegrated.

They will be put on trial together with the CCP.

Zhang Tianliang: “Over the years, the persecution

of Falun Gong and Zhou’s characteristics of maintaining stability have pushed the CCP to the crater.

Without openly dealing with Zhou and taking justice,

China』s problems cannot be resolved.

If they expose Zhou』s crimes and take initiatives to end

the CCP』s power, it will have the least harm to themselves.

They may get the people’s understanding and forgiveness.”

Chinese human rights lawyer Pu Zhiqiang said that

if the accusation to Gu does not include corruption,

it may mean it will not accuse Bo of corruption.

Meanwhile, Guo Yongfeng, sponsor of the Chinese

Citizen Union of Monitoring Politics, also believes that

the every high-level CCP official commits corruption.

Therefore, it’s difficult to deal

with Bo and Gu’s corruption crimes.

Guo Yongfeng: “(CCP) corruption is no longer a crime.

Engaging in the palace coup can be considered a crime.

Now, in order to maintain their internal harmony,

the CCP only targets Bo’s criminal cases.

It could be considered a ruling approach of the CCP.

I do not know, as all CCP officials killed people,

so what kind of accusation they will use.”

Guo Yongfeng said that in fact, a lot of CCP officials killed

people, but the couple of Bo and Gu killed a foreigner.

In addition, many netizens asked online why if the murder

occurred in Chongqing, was it is handed over to the Hefei Procuratorate to investigate and prosecute?

Li Tianxiao also said that under CCP rule there is no justice.

Bo and Gu would not be exposed if Wang Lijun hadn’t

escaped to the U.S. Consulate, and without Heywood’s death.

Li Tianxiao also said that Gu stated Heywood

had threatened Bo Guagua’s personal safety.

Particular points to observe are whether or not Heywood

had threatened Bo Guaguas personal safety.

Also whether Bo Guagua will appear

in court for testimony or not.