【新唐人2012年6月19日訊】大陸一年一度萬人爭過「獨木橋」的高考剛結束，網路上流傳幾篇2012年各地高考的「0分作文」，文章充滿了對社會現狀的不屑、調侃和諷刺，有批評教育體制的；也有對城管、拆遷、官員貪污腐敗、食品安全等社會不公平現象的反映。網民在稱讚作者有思想、有文才的同時，也為作者抱不平，認為給他們得零分是中國選才制度的悲哀。現在讓我們也來看一看這些「0分作文」。
2012年廣東高考「0分作文」——處女的眷戀。作者在作文中針對社會時弊，把中國人從小學到大學被中共洗腦十幾年，還有當局管控言論，封網，校車事故，紅十字會及官員強姦幼女定性嫖宿幼女罪等一一羅列出來。
文中用對白的方式說，（中共）如此邪惡的，如果給我重新投胎的機會，我一定不會選這個地方。
文中還對中共官員把社會上的惡性事件全部推到「臨時工」身上，並對民眾進行「假、大、空」的宣揚進行譏諷調侃。
然而這篇作文卻被打了零分。網民看了這篇「0分作文」後認為，作者知識豐富、涉獵廣泛、緊追時事、筆鋒幽默，文筆功底紮實，這麼好的文章給零分是中國教育的悲哀。
大陸自由撰稿人、原《河北人民廣播電臺》編輯朱欣欣表示，學生能夠勇敢真實的表達自己，難得可貴。
朱欣欣：「中國的教育完全是一種維護專制者統治的這麼一個工具，完全不是在培養一個獨立思考的這麼一個人的教育。所以，它在極力迴避針對現實的一些問題。」
網路作家荊楚表示，大陸的教育體系就是為了洗腦。
荊楚：「黨國的教育是想方設法把孩子的腦子禁錮起來，用馬克思、列寧那一套，站不住腳的那一套東西給孩子洗腦。你如果是不信那就要打零分，考試就過不了關。你必須按照它的框框來走，必須按照它的思維方式來思考，你才是一個好學生；第二個方面，它就是一個仇恨教育，就是黨國幾十年來灌輸這個階級鬥爭，灌輸這個白刀子進去紅刀子出來，灌輸你死我活。」
看了「0分作文」，荊楚認為，整體上文章立意新穎，邏輯性強，語言組織嚴密，不失為好文章，但中式教育，只允許為黨歌功頌德。
另外，廣東省有一篇高考「0分作文」《如果生活可以選擇我願生活在……》，文中調侃，如果生活可以選擇，我願生活在新聞聯播裡。那裏的領導個個都是時代先鋒，群眾人人都是道德模範。即使偶爾抓到一個貪官，也只是一筆帶過，不留一絲遺憾。….那裏的農業年年大豐收，工業月月傳喜訊。即使遇到百年不遇的自然災害和金融危機，都是有增無減…..那裏的孩子都能上得起學，窮人們都能看得起病…那裏是愛的家園，人間的天堂….
荊楚：「新聞聯播全是假大空嘛，到全國人民生不如死，新聞聯播裡還是形式一片大好，不是小好，而是越來越好，整個新聞聯播就是一個虛偽的冼腦，根本就沒有新聞。」
朱欣欣指出，能寫出0分作文的考生絕對能寫出滿分作文。而由各地考試院劃撥的閱卷費，一份試捲得花好幾塊錢，閱卷老師也不被允許讓那些用來影射社會現實的文章得高分。
採訪編輯/李韻 後製/君卓
Brainy or idiot? Scoring 0% in the written college entrance
examination in China
The highly competitive annual college entrance examination
has just concluded.
On the internet are revealed several papers of the 2012 College
Entrance Exam in mainland China that were marked 0%.
The articles are full of disdain, ridicule and satire on
the social current status.
Some criticize the education system; some reflect on social
Inequities: house demolition, official corruption, food safety etc.
While netizens praise the authors’ ideology and literary talent,
they also feel disaffected for the authors.
They think scoring 0% in these writings is a sorrow of the
Chinese education system. Let’s take a look at these 0% writings.
One of the 0% papers of 2012 College Entrance Exam in
Guangdong is “The attachment of Virgins”.
Reflecting on the social ills, the author listed the social events
in the 10+ years of brainwashing by Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from primary school to college.
The article also included the authorities’ control of speech,
internet blockade, school bus accidents,
the Red Cross event and officials raping young girls,
which was characterized as prostituting young girls, etc.
In the article, the author wrote in the dialogue that the CCP is
so evil, if I were given another opportunity to be born again, I certainly would not choose this place.
The article also ridiculed that CCP officials blame all serious
social incidents on the “temporary workers”.
It also ridiculed CCP’s “false, big and empty” propagandas.
However, this writing was scored 0%.
After netizens read this writing, they said that
the author has a wealth of knowledge.
The article covers a wide range with hot pursuit of current
events, humor and a solid foundation of writing.
Such a good article was scored 0% and it is a sorrow of
the Chinese education system.
Zhu Xinxin, freelance writer in mainland China and former
editor of Hebei People’s Radio,
said that it is rare and valuable for the students
to express their true thoughts bravely.
Zhu Xinxin: “China’s education is a tool to maintain the rule
of dictators, absolutely not an education for bringing up persons with independent thinking.
Therefore, it tries its best to evade the issues in real society.”
Internet writer Jing Chu said that the education system in
mainland China is about brainwashing.
Jing Chu: “The education in the party-state is trying to lock up
the minds of children, using an untenable set of ideology from Marx and Lenin to brainwash the children.
If you do not believe it, you will be scored 0%
so you will not be able to pas the test.
You must go in accordance with the process, and
you must think in accordance with its requirements of thinking.
Only by doing so are you a good student.
A second aspect, it is an education of hatred, in which the
party-state has inculcated the class struggle for decades.
The CCP inculcated fighting and killing, with life and death.”
After reading the 0% writing, Jing Chu said that the article had
a novel subject, strong logic and well-organized language.
After all, it s a good article. But in the education of CCP,
it is only allowed to write praise for the CCP.
In addition, there is 0% mark for a paper from the College
Entrance Exam in Guangdong province, with title “If I can choose life, I would like to live in …”
The article ridiculed that if the student could choose their life,
they would live in the News Feeds of the CCP state sanctioned
media (CCTV) where the leaders there are all vanguards of the
times, and everyone of the masses is a moral model.
Even occasionally a corrupt official is caught, it is just a
passing, without leaving a trace of regret….
The agriculture there has very good harvest every year, and
the industry has good news every month.
Even in the face of natural disasters and financial crises,
there are only increases in the economy without reduction.
The children there are all able to go to school;
the poor also can afford medical treatment…
That place is a home of love and a paradise on earth…
Jing Chu: “the irony is that The News Feeds (of CCTV) are
all false, big and empty lies.
Even as the people in the whole country only just survive
there are still reports of excellence in the News Feeds.
It is not a small excellence, but an exaggerated excellence.
The entire News Feeds are a hypocritical brainwashing;
there is simply no real news.”
Zhu Xinxin pointed out that the candidates scoring 0% on thier
writing can absolutely write out articles with the full pictures.
There is a marking fee allocated by the exam institutions.
The teachers marking are not allowed to score highly
the articles which reflect the social realities.