【新唐人2012年5月16日訊】中共黨報《人民日報》，極其罕見的整版刊登文章談「政改」。外界分析，在目前中共政治敏感時機談「政改」，顯示胡溫在這個問題上已經達成共識，而在溫家寶和周永康的對決當中，溫家寶佔了上風。但是，針對「政改」議題，具體改甚麼?怎麼改? 以人民的利益為重，還是仍以中共的利益為重? 分析說，老百姓正等著看胡溫做甚麼，而不是說甚麼。

《人民日報》5月14號，在第五版，用整版刊登署名「鄭志文」對這一議題展開的論述，並圍繞六個方面論證中國政治體制改革。香港《東方日報》表示，作為具有風向標意義的《人民日報》以大篇幅文章討論政改，顯然不是無的放矢。報導說，《人民日報》論政改，是為十八大定調。

不過，在此之前，中共總理溫家寶曾多次呼籲「政改」，不是被冷遇，就是遭到批評。

美國「喬治梅森大學」教授章天亮表示，在胡溫當政期間，《人民日報》這樣大量談政改還是頭一次，這表明溫家寶和周永康的對決當中，溫家寶佔了上風。

美國「喬治梅森大學」教授章天亮：「因為實際上《人民日報》，它是在中宣部的控制下的，中宣部是在李長春的控制下，而李長春和周永康之間屬於一個結盟的關係，他們都曾經被法輪功學員起訴過了，所以說，我想，在這個過程中，《人民日報》能登出來，他標誌溫家寶確實是在這個角力的過程中勝出了。」

《大紀元》新聞網14號也發表「溫家寶戰勝周永康」文章，指稱，胡錦濤在一次會議上最終決定對周永康進行調查，並補充說，調查須要在「公正」但「不公開」的原則下進行。所有與會者都意識到胡、溫現時對周永康的策略是「溫水燉青蛙」。而在這個非常敏感的時機，《人民日報》呼應溫家寶刊登整版「政改」的文章，顯示胡、溫在「政改」這個問題上已經達成共識。

而網路作家吳建國認為，在中國，政改到底能走多遠？之前很多事情表明，一旦涉及黨的利益，很多事情就被否決了。

網路作家吳建國：「六四鎮壓，也就是中共對80年代政改的徹底否決，六四後不僅政改被擱置了，而且還進一步剝奪了人民參政議政的權利，也就造成了之後鎮壓法輪功這樣的特大冤案，以及中國社會面臨的各種危機。」

因此，吳建國希望溫家寶推行的政改，能夠以人民的利益為重，而不要以中共的利益為重，這樣才有真正的政改。

章天亮表示，現在中共談的政改，並沒有超出當年胡耀邦和趙紫陽所談的範圍，而那時的老百姓對政治體制改革，還是抱有很大的信心，但是現在不一樣了，老百姓不但要看你說甚麼，還要看你做甚麼。章天亮說，民心不是靠空話就能贏得的。

章天亮：「比如說，廢了中共，另立一個新黨，開放結社，在中國實行向自由社會過渡，這些，我覺得都是作為胡、溫來講的話，是可以名垂青史的事情。那麼我們也非常希望看到，這些雙手沾滿了鮮血，像周永康這樣的人，他們能夠被清洗，其實對於周永康能夠被比如說免職，像薄熙來那樣公開處理呀，對於胡、溫來講，他在黨內可以立威，連周永康這樣的狠角色，他們都能搞定的話，那麼其他別人更不在話下了。」

吳建國也表示，血債派就是要維護現有的暴政，來保證他們不被清算，胡、溫如果通過政改，比如尊重人民的參政、議政權或言論自由等方面的權利，一方面可以贏得人心，另一方面通過法律的手段可以清算血債派，吳建國認為，這是好的趨勢。

採訪撰稿/常春 後製/薛莉

How will Hu-Wen make “political reform”?

The state-run “People’s Daily” newspaper has published

a full-page article on “political reform”.

Analysts think it means that there is a Hu-Wen consensus

to discuss “political reform” at such a sensitive time.

Wen has also prevailed in a duel with Zhou Yongkang.

However, how will they make “political reform”?

Is it related to benefiting people or to benefit the CCP?

It is reported that Chinese people are waiting to see what

actions Hu and Wen take, rather than what they talk about.

On May 14, People’s Daily published an article by an author

named “Zheng Zhi Wen” in the fifth forum.

The article discussed six aspects of “political reform” in China.

Oriental Daily News in Hong Kong said it obviously has

a special meaning to discuss “political reform” with such a great length of article in “People’s Daily”.

Oriental Daily News thought this article raises a tone

for the coming 18th CCP National Congress.

Wen has called for “political reform” many times before,

but was met a cold shoulder and received a lot of criticism.

Zhang Tianliang, professor at George Mason University, US,

said that this is the first article which has discussed

“political reform” in depth since Hu and wen came to power.

It means Wen prevailed in the duel which Zhou Yongkang.

Zhang Tianliang: “In fact, People’s Daily is controlled

by the Central Propaganda Department.

The Central Propaganda Department is controlled

by Li Changchun.

Li and Zhou are in the same faction and they were sued

by Falun Gong practitioners before.

Therefore, I think the article in People’s Daily means

that Wen prevailed in the duel with Zhou Yongkang.”

On May 14, the Epoch Times also published an article

named “Wen defeated Zhou Yongkang”.

The article said Hu decided to investigate Zhou under

the “fair” but “not open” principle in a meeting.

All participants noticed that Hu and Wen dealt with

Zhou by the “stew a frog in slowly heated water” strategy.

In this very sensitive time, People’s Daily publishing

a full-page report on “political reform” echoes that Wen published a “political reform" article.

It means that there is a consensus between Hu and Wen

on this issue.

Wu Jianguo, an Internet commentator, asks how far can

political reform go in China?

A lot of things are rejected when it comes to CCP interests.

Wu Jianguo: “The June 4th event means a rejection of CCP

political reform in 1980s, and ever worse, people’s right

to participate in politics are deprived after that.

It results in the injustice in suppressing Falun Gong,

and other various crises in China.”

Wu Jianguo hopes that political reform by Wen will take

into account what benefit’s the people as much as possible,

rather than benefiting the CCP.

Then it will become real political reform.

Zhang Tianliang says the current discussion on political

reform is still within the range of what Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang talked about.

By that time, people had confidence in political reform.

However, everything is different now.

People would like to see what you are doing,

instead of what you are talking about.

Zhang Tianliang thought that public opinion

is now not relying on useless words.

Zhang Tianliang: “For example, they can revoke CCP

and establish a new party.

They should allow others to establish association freely.

All these will let them go down in the history.

We also hope that Zhou and the “bloody” group

will be punished.

In fact, if Zhou is removed from his duty, just like Bo Xilai,

then Hu and Wen can establish credibility within the CCP.

Because if they can deal with such a grizzly guy,

others are just like pieces of cake.”

Wu Jianguo said, the “bloody” group want to sustain tyranny

to prevent them from being revoked.

If Hu and Wen make political reforms and give people

the right to participate in politics and have freedom of speech,

then they can access public support and punish

the “bloody” group through legal means. It is a good trend, Wu said.