【禁聞】汪薄隔空頻交鋒 黨報和稀泥蛋糕論

Facebook

【新唐人2011年10月13日訊】香港媒體報導說,重慶市委書記薄熙來不愧是造勢的高手,在重慶新一輪的「食品打黑風暴」中,美國超市巨頭沃爾瑪(Walmart)成了重點打擊對像。薄熙來與廣東省委書記汪洋在中共十八大前頻頻爭論交鋒,而中共黨報和稀泥試圖平息汪、薄「蛋糕論」爭議,引起外界關注。

中共太子黨代表人物薄熙來提出,重慶這幾年的思路是先將「蛋糕分好再做大」。但是,薄熙來重歸毛澤東時代的做法遭到黨內外批評,之後他又辯解說「分好蛋糕,不是大鍋飯」。

團派代表人物汪洋在廣東省委十屆九次全會上,則強調要注重民生問題,提出「要做大蛋糕仍然是要以經濟建設為中心」,就是說「分蛋糕不是重點工作,做蛋糕是重點」。由此引發與薄熙來的「蛋糕論」爭議。

深圳學者朱健國:「還是因為十八大,爭上位就必須有一套東西能去忽悠百姓,和讓黨內高層得票,他需要有這麼個東西。那麼,重慶和廣東走的路徑不同,重慶走的是重歸毛、重歸馬列原教旨這一條路,汪洋他走的是另一條路,就是緊跟團派領導胡錦濤。」

汪洋與薄熙來的爭論被外界稱為「廣東模式」與「重慶模式」之爭。法國《費加羅報》引述汪洋的一句格言:「歷史不允許我們躺在計劃經濟的溫床上睡大覺。」香港《亞洲週刊》認為「重慶模式」就是對共產黨傳統的回歸。

《人民日報》10月11號發表中國人民大學教授衛興華的文章,強調「做大蛋糕」與「分好蛋糕」同時併進,對汪、薄的「蛋糕論」爭議和稀泥。

朱健國:「他表面上是調和、和稀泥,都是要為這個黨,這是他們共同的,兩個都不是為民,都是為黨、為自己。那麼,現在《人民日報》出了這麼一個評論,來平息他們,也平息公眾。」

美國南卡羅來納大學艾肯商學院教授謝田指出,中國經濟發展的收益,絕大部分給中共權貴拿走了,所以造成物價飛漲,貧富差距加劇。在中共體制下,老百姓根本沒有機會公平分得蛋糕,分配不公和腐敗是民眾憤怒的主要原因。

政論家林葆華:「我想這個不過是中共特權集團裡面彼此在玩文字遊戲,好像是給老百姓有一點期望。這個特權階層掌握了做蛋糕的權力,也掌握了分蛋糕的權力,他們不論是怎麼做,並不是為老百姓做,他們只是為他們統治集團做,剝削老百姓的血汗來做這個蛋糕。」

薄熙來為晉身十八大,大搞「唱紅打黑」運動,遭到胡溫派系抵制。薄熙來另起爐灶,搞出了所謂「共同富裕12條」等新舉措,最近又掀起了「食品打黑風暴」。

重慶市10號指控美資超市沃爾瑪銷售假冒「綠色豬肉」,下令沃爾瑪在重慶的13家分店停業整頓15天,重罰269萬元人民幣,並刑事拘留7家分店負責人。

當地市民質問:假貨到處都是,為甚麼重慶其他商家超市沒有查出來?《廣州日報》10號一篇題為《汪洋:不能用運動式方式解決民生問題 》的報導,再度引發外界議論汪洋暗諷薄熙來。

今年6月,薄熙來率領千人「紅歌團」到北京演出,結果中南海領導人全部缺席。汪洋則表示「增強憂患意識比歌頌輝煌更重要」,與薄熙來唱反調。

10月5號、6號,重慶市委機關報《重慶日報》頭版上,通過鄧小平胞弟鄧墾、胡錦濤堂弟胡錦星之口來稱讚薄熙來。

《博訊網》引述消息透露,中共向來沒有領導人兄弟、堂弟可以干擾人事安排的傳統和記錄,報導提到的胡錦星與鄧墾與決策層的關係幾乎為零。薄熙來爭取政法委書記或管宣傳的常委兩位置,目前都已落空。

原香港《文匯報》東北辦事處主任姜維平指出,薄熙來自比毛澤東,想重復文革的老路,一方面靠操控的媒體大肆編造經濟發展的成就,另一方面靠公檢法司對付政治異己,他想把自己的貪腐隱藏下來,但卻救不了薄熙來,更救不了共產黨。

新唐人記者周玉林、李元翰、朱娣採訪報導。

Debates Inside the CCP, Bo Xilai』s Ambition Dashed

The media in Hong Kong reported that Bo Xilai,

Chongqing Communist Party (CCP) Secretary,

initiated a new round of building up, campaign.

In his recent “crackdown on unsafe food",

U.S. supermarket giant Wal-Mart became the target.

The upcoming 18th CCP congress triggered

heated debates between Bo Xilai and Wang Yang,

the Guangdong CCP Secretary.

Meanwhile the CCP mouthpiece newspaper tried to

calm things down by giving the runaround.

This incites public controversy.

Bo Xilai, the representative of CCP prince lings, put forward

that Chongqing authorities』 way of thinking in recent years is

“dividing the cake before making it bigger."

However, Bo was criticized inside and outside the CCP,

for his launching campaign of returning to Mao Zedong』s era.

Bo argues that “dividing the cake is not a practice of

eating from the same big pot."

Wang Yang , the representative of Hu Jintao’s Youth League

clique, at the ninth plenary session of Tenth Guangdong

Provincial CCP Committee, stressed the necessity of

paying attention to people’s livelihood.

Wang said that “to make the cake bigger should still

focus on the central task of economic construction."

That is to say, “the focus point is not to divide the cake,

but to make the cake bigger."

Wang』s argument goes against Bo』s “cake" theory.

Zhu Jianguo (Shenzhen-based scholar): “The reason behind

everything is still the 18th CCP congress.

To gain the upper hand, it needs some theories to push

around the masses and to win the votes from the

CCP top level. In reality, Chongqing and Guangdong

followed different paths.

Chongqing is returning to Marxist-Leninist fundamentalism,

Wang Yang is taking the other way,

closely following the leadership of Hu Jintao.

Debates between Wang Yang and Bo are considered

as a dispute between the Guangdong model and the

Chongqing model.

French newspaper Le Figaro quoted Wang Yang as saying

that “History does not allow us to fall asleep on the hotbed of

a planned economy."

Hong Kong-based Asia Week comments that the

Chongqing model is a return to CCP』s traditions.

On 11th October, People』s Daily published an article of

Wei Xinghua, a professor at Renmin University of China.

The article stressed that “making the cake bigger " and

“dividing the cake," should be run together,

giving the runaround for debates between Wang and Bo.

Zhu Jianguo: “It looks like he is reconciling, but it is actually

acting for the CCP. That is their common point.

Neither of the two cliques is concerned about the public, but

none other than the CCP and themselves. So the review

article of People’s Daily is used to calm down the two cliques

as well as the masses."

Xie Tian, a Professor of Aiken School of Business at

University of South Carolina, pointed out that

most benefits gained by economic development in China

have gone to CCP』s elite, causing soaring prices and

increased gap between the rich and the poor.

Under the CCP』s ruling, civilians have no chance at all

to get a fair share of the cake.

The unjust distribution of wealth and corruption

are the major contributing factors to the public』s fury.

Lin Baohua (Political commentator): " In my opinion,

it is no more than a game of words played inside the CCP』s

privileged stratum, seemingly bringing little hope

to the masses. This privileged stratum controls the power

of making the cake as well as dividing the cake.

So whatever they do with the cake, it is not done for the

public but for themselves, for the ruling group,

for the exploitation of the masses."

In order to be politically promoted in the 18th CCP congress

Bo Xilai vigorously launched a campaign of

“singing the red songs and suppressing the mafia,"

but suffered resistance from the Hu-Wen faction.

Bo started all over again, coming up with some new

initiatives including so-called “12 approaches to

achieve common prosperity." Recently, Bo launched

another campaign of “cracking down on unsafe food."

On 10th October, Chongqing authorities accused Wal-Mart,

an US-owned supermarket, of selling fake “green pork".

13 local Wal-Mart stores were ordered to close for 15 days,

with a heavy penalty of RMB 2.69 million.

Heads of seven stores were criminally detained.

Local citizens questioned: Everywhere is flooded with

fake goods, but why haven』t they been found

in other supermarkets in Chongqing? “

On 10th October, Guangzhou Daily published an article

entitled " Wang Yang: Issues of People』s Livelihood cannot

be Resolved in a Campaign-Style Approach."

The article once again triggered public discussions about

Wang』s insinuation towards Bo Xilai.

This June, Bo led a Red Song Group consisting of

1000 members to put on a show in Beijing.

All CCP top leaders in Zhongnanhai were absent.

Wang Yang sang a different tune, saying that

“to strengthen awareness of potential dangers is

more important than the praise of glory."

On October 5 and 6, Chongqing Daily, official media of

Chongqing CCP authorities published on its front page

the words of praises towards Bo Xilai, out of the mouths

of Deng Ken, the younger brother of Deng Xiaoping

and Hu Jinxing, a cousin of CCP leader Hu Jintao.

Sources quoted by Boxun.com said that the CCP never

has the traditional practice that the CCP leaders』 brothers

or cousins can interfere in its arrangement of personnel.

The relationship of Hu Jinxing and Deng Ken with

CCP』s decision-making level is almost zero.

Bo Xilai』s striving for the positions of Secretary of CCP

Central Political and Legal Committee and member of

the standing committee in charge of propaganda,

has been so far dashed.

Jiang Weiping, the former northeast office director of

Hong Kong-based Wen Wei Po newspaper, points out

that Bo Xilai, regarding himself as Mao Zedong, wants to

go back to the old path of Cultural Revolution.

On one hand, he manipulates the media to fabricate

the successes of economic development, on the other hand,

through the integral system of Public Security,

Procurement Court and Justice to suppress

political dissidents, Bo tries to hide his corruptions.

Yet all of this cannot save Bo Xilai, let alone saving the CCP.

NTD reporters Zhou Yulin, Li Yuanhan and Zhu Di.

相關文章