【新唐人2014年11月07日訊】中共外交官用習近平專機走私象牙
總部設在英國的非政府組織——「環境調查局 （Environmental investigation agency）」，11月6號公布的一份調查報告說，中共駐坦桑尼亞大使館的外交官，是該國盜獵象牙走私的買家之一。
「環境調查局」說，他們的調查員從非法象牙供應商口中得知，一些中共大使館的官員，至少從2006年起，就開始大批購買盜獵的象牙。
報告說，在2013年中共國家主席習近平訪問坦桑尼亞期間，中共外交官員就非法購買了數千公斤象牙，並將象牙藏在習近平專機上的外交郵袋中，偷運回中國。
據《法新社》報導，中共外交部發言人在11月6號的例行記者會上指責相關報告毫無根據。
香港警察與示威者再度發生衝突
香港民眾爭民主普選的「佔領行動」，11月6號已經進入第40天，平靜了一段的金鐘和旺角佔領區，當天再次發生警民衝突。
據《自由亞洲電臺》報導，5號深夜，在旺角，警方一度施放胡椒噴霧，驅逐示威人士，有抗議者投訴被打傷。而在金鐘，當晚也有一批戴著「V煞」面具的示威者遊行，期間，與警察發生衝突。
報導說，旺角和金鐘兩地，最少有三人在衝突中被捕，多人受傷。
網民：佔中和APEC哪個更擾民
亞太經合組織峰會（APEC）正在北京召開，北京當局為了這個會議，命令學校停課、工廠停工、車輛限行、牛奶停送，擾民動作之大，讓海外媒體都譏笑不已。
而香港的「佔中」行動，也一直被所謂的「反佔中」人士，以影響市民正常生活為由，加以反對。
11月6號，有大陸網民在網上討論，是香港大學生佔中擾民還是北京APEC更擾民？哪個更應該反對？
有網友發帖質問說，反佔中人士指責佔中影響交通？影響商鋪？影響普通人上班生計？因此要反佔中。那好，APEC影響北京市民更甚，那APEC反不反？該怎麼反？還有中共的那些「兩會」、「全會」都很擾民，要不要反？
編輯/周玉林
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Diplomat Smuggled
Illegal Ivory onto Xi Jinping’s Plane
Headquartered in the UK, Non-Governmental organization,
Environmental Investigation Agency published a survey on
November 6th claiming that:
the CCP diplomat in Tanzania is one buyer of illegal ivory,
smuggling from poaching.
Environmental Investigation Agency quoted what the illegal
ivory suppliers admitted that lots of Chinese Embassy officials
began to purchase a large amount of poached ivory since 2006.
The horrifying report said that Chinese Foreign officials illegally purchased thousands of kilograms of poached ivory and smuggled
it back to China in a diplomatic bag on Xi Jinping’s plane.
This is reported to have taken place during 2013 Chinese
President Xi Jinping’s trip in Tanzania.
According to the Agence France-Presse report, the Chinese
Foreign Ministry spokesman accused the related reports of being
baseless, at their regular press conference on November 6th.
The Conflict Between Hong Kong Police and Demonstrators
Recurred
It has been 40 days since the Hong Kong universal suffrage
occupation movement begun.
The clash between police and protesters occurred again in
Admiralty and Mong Kok after a few days of calm.
According to Radio Free Asia report, on the 5th night, the police
even used pepper spray to disperse protesters in Mong Kok. The
protesters were injured.
In the Admiralty, a number of marchers in V evil masks clashed
with police.
The report said that there were at least three arrests in the conflict
in Mong Kok and Admiralty, many were injured.
Netizens: What is More Disturbing, Occupy Central or
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)?
The Beijing authorities ordered the suspension of school classes,
the shut down of factories, vehicle access curtailed, milk delivery
stopped all for the APEC Summit in Beijing.
These big disruptions made foreign Media mock incessantly.
The Hong Kong Occupy Central movement was opposed by the
so-called “Anti-Occupy Central" people with the pathetic
excuse of the disruption to normal life.
November 6, mainland netizens discussed online about which
one is more disturbing, Hong Kong University Students’
Occupy Central or APEC?
Some netizens questioned the sincerity of the Anti-Occupy Central people whom accuse Occupy Central of disrupting shops and ordinary
working people. That’s supposedly why they wanted to anti Occupy Central.
However, APEC is imposing and disrupting Beijing people on an
even wider scale.
Should we be against APEC?
The CCP’s two sessions and plenary also disturb people, should
we protest against that?
Edit/Zhou Yulin