【新唐人2014年10月14日訊】日前，中共黨媒推出美國是香港「佔中」活動幕後黑手的說法，遭到美國國務院駁斥，認為這種指控「完全虛假」，試圖轉移事件焦點。分析指出，這是中共的一貫手法， 刻意抹黑民間訴求。
自香港和平佔中運動開始以來，中共一直強調，運動是受到所謂的「外國勢力煽動」的結果。10號，中共黨媒《人民日報》刊文指稱，美國一些非政府組織和智庫，對香港「佔領中環」運動，積極的出謀劃策，對「佔中」起到了推波助瀾的作用。
文章說，據外媒報導，早在幾個月前，美國國務院轄下的國家民主基金會（NED）負責人路易莎•格雷夫，就與「佔中」的「靈魂人物」見面，討論「佔中」事宜。
《中國日報網》7號的一篇報導還說，美國政治智庫Land Destroyer的一位研究員撰文指出，美國透過國家民主基金會，為「佔中」出錢出力，因此主宰「佔中」的，是華府和華爾街。
香港立法會議員何俊仁：「這是完全沒有根據，是抹黑香港民間的民主運動，這個民主基金會從來在全球各地，包括香港，都有資助一些民間團體做一些普選的工作，包括有時安排一些人去美國考察，其實香港的建制派連同親共的民建聯也有收到這樣的資助，錢也是不多，相比中共在香港的投資，根本是不可以相比，完全不成比例。」
而《中新網》也在3號發表「香港『佔中』十問」一文，其中第六問把矛頭指向「佔中」背後的西方勢力，並把美國駐港總領館官員丹•蓋瑞特，稱為是一個高級間諜。文章還說，設立於香港中文大學內的「香港美國中心」，是培訓大學生成為「佔中」骨幹的基地。
原人民日報記者光遠：「中共的官媒，一般它都不是實事求是的，因為它沒有一個監督機制，這是第一，第二，你即便說是美國甚麼基金會、美國甚麼組織在支持佔中，但是你光說不行啊，要拿出證據來，你沒有依據，你光是說，很難取得公民的信任，或者是能蠱惑大家。」
針對中共官媒的抨擊，美國國務院發言人哈夫11號發表聲明強調，美國在香港「佔中運動」中沒有扮演任何角色，香港目前發生的事件只與港人有關，是香港民眾自發表達爭取真普選的訴求，其他任何說法，都是有意轉移港人爭取普選權利的視線焦點。
香港立法會議員葉建源：「香港的佔中運動，肯定是一個自發為主的運動，大部分的民眾是看到香港政府使用催淚彈，或者是民主方面的一些進展受到了很大的一個阻礙，才會出來。」
光遠：「民眾自發的，沒有任何人來指使，指使這麼多人，怎麼指使，參加這種遊行的，都是18歲以上的，都是成年人了，有自己的判斷力，跟他的想法一樣，他就參與了。」
英國《星期日泰晤士報》12號指出，香港特首梁振英涉嫌隱瞞曾收取澳大利亞工程公司5000萬港元報酬的消息曝光後，中共更是認定，以美國為首的所謂西方陣營，試圖搞亂香港。
何俊仁：「它們從來都是這樣，89年六四屠殺之後，也是指責學生受到外國、連同美國背後在指使，你看，過了25年有甚麼證據，完全沒有的，共產黨總是編出一些謊言，抹黑它的對手，也為自己來個解說，他們從來不承認，自己的政策有很多錯誤，起到了人心背向。」
《中國數據時代》網站刊文指出，如果外國勢力隨便就能在香港煽動一場那麼具犧牲性而且富有道德感召的民主運動，以中共的組織能力與資源財力，早就煽動全香港人認祖歸宗、愛國愛黨了﹔之所以做不到，是因為「煽動」必須以民眾的價值信念為基礎，不能與之牴觸。這是「外國勢力煽動」一說最大的漏洞。
採訪/秦雪 編輯/陳潔 後製/葛雷
US Categorically Rejects Communist Accusation
he Communist mouthpiece recently launched an attack
against the US and referred to foreign interference in
Occupy Central.
The US State Department rejected such allegations as
completely false and a diversion of the focus.
Analysts indicate this is the usual practice of the Communist
regime to deliberately discredit civil appeals.
Since the beginning of Occupy movement, the CCP has claimed
the movement is backed by “foreign interferences".
People’s Daily criticized the NGO and think tank in the US have
manipulated and plotted the Occupy Central movement.
It said that, Louisa Greve, a director of the National Endowment
for Democracy of the US (NED), was already meeting with the
key people from “Occupy Central" several months ago,
to talk about the movement.
Accordingly, a Land Destroyer report indicated Washington
and Wall Street are directing the politicians and protest leaders
behind “Occupy Central" through the US State Department’s
National Endowment for Democracy (NED).
Hong Kong Legislative Council Albert Ho: “This is completely
unfounded.
It is to discredit the democratic movement in Hong Kong.
The NED has always funded civil societies in the world,
including Hong Kong, in the universal suffrage.
Sometimes people are arranged to visit the US.
In fact, both the pro-Beijing camp and the pro-Beijing DAB
(Democratic Alliance for Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong)
have received their funding as well. The money was not much.
Compared to what the CCP invested in Hong Kong,
it is completely out of proportion."
In its article regarding the 10 questions on Occupy Central,
China News pointed to the Western forces.
It identified an American author and researcher, Dan Garrett,
as a “flagrant spy" and referred to the Hong Kong-America Center
at the Chinese University of Hong Kong as the training base
for the student leaders in Occupy Central.
Former People’s Daily reporter Guang Yuan: “CCP’s official
media never seeks truth due to a lack of supervising mechanism
for one.
Second, even if they claimed the Occupy movement is funded
by some US organizations, where is the evidence?
Without any evidence, you can’t win the trust of the people.
It could confuse people, perhaps."
The US Department of State deputy spokesperson Harf stressed
on the daily press briefing that the State Department do not
have a role in this Occupy movement.
She said, “What is happening there is about the people of
Hong Kong, and any assertion otherwise is an attempt
to distract from the issue at hand."
Hong Kong Legislative Council Ip Kin-yuen: “The Occupy
Central is certainly a spontaneous movement.
Majority people came out because the Hong Kong Government
used tear gas, or realized democracy is greatly hindered."
Guang Yuan: “The people have spontaneously joined the
movement. How can so many people be instructed?
They are over 18 years of age, adults,
who have their own judgment and ideas."
The Sunday Times reported on the 12th, public ire towards
the chief executive has intensified after the exposure of CY Leung
being paid more than £4m in fees under a pre-existing contract
with the Australian engineering company UGL.
Beijing accuses US of a Hong Kong plot
and the “foreign interference" in Hong Kong.
Albert Ho: “It’s their routine. After the Tiananmen massacre
in 1989, the students were accused of being influenced and
instructed by foreign forces such as the US.
Look at it, it has been over 25 years and there is no evidence.
The Communist Party always made up some lie to discredit
its opponents and to explain its own deeds.
They would never admit their deeds have lost the support
of the people."
China Digital Times indicated that if foreign forces can indeed
incite a democratic movement of sacrificial and moral appeal,
the CCP’s organizational capacity and financial resources
would have had great appeal to the Hong Kongers who would
have returned to the mainland.
It has failed simply because the incitement must comply and
be consistent with the beliefs of the people.
This is one the biggest loopholes in the theory of
“inciting foreign forces."
Interview/QinXue Edit/ChenJie Post-Production/Gelei