【新唐人2014年06月14日訊】中共「六四屠城」25週年剛過，中共黨媒《人民日報》在海外版刊登題為「我可以屠城，你不能出聲」的文章。內容雖然是針對「日本反對中國把南京大屠殺等歷史檔案申遺」一事，但讓很多網民聯想起中共「六四鎮壓」，並表示用詞太確切了！

中共「六四屠城」25週年紀念日剛剛過去一週，《人民日報》6月12號的海外版頭版，卻刊登一篇題為「日本的強盜邏輯 —— 我可以屠城，你不能出聲」的文章。

文章痛斥「日本不斷否認歷史，拒絕反思歷史」。

原來，10號，中共把1937年「南京大屠殺」、和日軍強徵「慰安婦」的歷史檔案，申報世界記憶名錄，而日本內閣官房長官菅義偉11號要求中方撤回申請。並且聲稱：「感到非常遺憾」。

《人民日報》指責日方的表態是「強盜邏輯」。許多網友把文章中的「屠城」，與1989年中共「六四」坦克進京屠殺天安門抗議學生相聯繫。並且抨擊中共當局對中國的歷史進行封堵和拒絕反思。

有網友表示：「真不知道這是說日本，還是說某黨….『六四』才過去一個禮拜，這不是在搞含沙射影嗎？」也有網友嘲諷：「我可以屠城，你不能出聲；我可以強拆，你不能上訪；我可以放火，你不能點燈，人民日報不愧為黨的第一喉舌，一針見血的指出問題所在，這才是獨裁政府的強盜邏輯！」

大陸網路作家荊楚表示，「六四」剛過，《人民日報》刊出這麼一個標題，自然讓人聯想到中共25年前的那場大屠殺，用詞太確切了。

大陸網路作家荊楚：「六四一直是當局的禁忌，不讓議論、不讓說、不讓提及，它以這樣的話嘲笑日本，等於自己在嘲笑它自己，看著這樣的標題，給讀者和觀眾這樣一個印象：我可以屠城，你不能議論，就是講的中國的現實嘛。」

就在一週前的「六四」25週年，中共不但嚴控網路，禁止人們在網路上討論有關「六四」話題，還大肆拘捕、軟禁與「六四」相關的各界人士，同時還動員全民「反恐」。

荊楚指出，中共刻意封殺「六四」信息，希望人們儘快遺忘「六四」真相，實際上，中共歷次運動中屠殺的中國人，相當於幾十個「南京大屠殺」。

他質問，是不是「六四屠殺」以及「文革、大躍進」等，也要申報世界記憶名錄？

荊楚：「中國的反右、文革、六四，這麼多醜事它不敢面對，光是一個文革，被打死的人，有資料研究就將近2000萬，最慘烈的還是大躍進之後的大餓荒，官方的統計是555萬，很多學者們研究應該不少於5000萬。」

荊楚認為，對於歷史問題，不論中共當局還是日本政府都不應選擇性遺忘，掩蓋真相。

1931年9月18號，日本入侵中國，到1945年8月日本投降，這15年間，上千萬中國人被殺害，僅1937年「南京大屠殺」，就有34萬中國軍、民死亡，還有難以計數的中國女性被姦淫，僅飽受蹂躪的中國「慰安婦」就有數十萬人。

世界二戰結束後，1952年，時任「中華民國」總統的蔣介石與日本簽定「華日和平條約」，宣告放棄對日本要求戰爭賠償；1972年，毛澤東與日本發表了《中日聯合聲明》也放棄了對日索賠；1987年，鄧小平訪日，與日本簽訂了《中日和約》，以法律條款確定放棄對日索賠。

旅日自由學者和評論人士王進忠說，當年日本成立了一個「慰安婦基金會」，專門對受害者進行賠償。

旅日自由學者、評論人士王進忠：「日本就慰安婦有個賠償基金，南韓人也賠了很多，很多人沒有領，中國人是大部分人不知道，所以基金後來剩了一筆錢，但是基金會它也不可能永遠放在哪，就退回去了。」

香港《蘋果日報》指出，在中、日關係友好的年代，中國民間對日索償的行動，被視為「破壞兩國關係」而受到打壓，民間「對日索償聯合會」更被中共當成鎮壓對像，嚴加控制。

採訪編輯/李韻 後製/孫寧

Party Mouthpiece Article After June 4: “I Can Massacre,

You Can’t Speak."

Straight after the 25th anniversary of the June 4 massacre, the

Chinese Communist Party (CCP) media People’s Daily put an

inflammatory article on it’s overseas edition.

Although the article is about Japan opposing China applying

for historical documents of the Nanjing massacre, many relate

it to the CCP’s repression to June 4, implying that the words

used are very accurate.

On June 12 the People’s Daily published the article on

the front page.

It was titled “Japanese Gangster Logic – I Can Massacre,

You Can’t Speak".

The article said “Japan keeps on denying history

and refusing to reflect on history."

On June 10, the CCP applied to the Memory of the World

Register for documents about the Nanjing massacre.

They also wanted information about Japan’s forced

recruitment of the 『comfort women』.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga requested

China withdraw the application the next day.

He said “It’s extremely regrettable."

The People’s Daily accuses Japan’s response

as being “gangster logic."

Many netizens relate the Nanjing massacre to the June 4

Tainanmen massacre of 1989 when the CCP killed students.

They denounce the CCP for blocking history

and refusing to reflect on history.

A netizen remarked, “Truly unsure if it’s talking about Japan

or some party; June 4 just past a week ago, isn’t it innuendo?"

Another netizen said, “I can massacre, you can’t speak. I can

force demolition, you can’t petition.

I can create arson, you can’t light a lamp.

The People’s Daily deserves to be the No 1 party mouthpiece.

It directly points out the key issue, which is a dictator

government’s gangster logic!"

Mainland Chinese internet author Jing Chu says such a title at

June 4 is convenient for people to think of the CCP’s massacre.

After 25 years it’s so accurate.

Jing Chu “June 4 has always been a banned topic by the CCP.

No one can discuss, talk about, or mention it.

It uses those words to mock Japan, which also mocks itself.

Such a headline gives the audience an impression that ‘I can

massacre but you can’t talk about it’, which is China’s reality."

During the 25th anniversary of June 4, the CCP strictly

controlled the internet.

It also banned any topics related to June 4.

It also rampantly arrested people involved in June 4,

and mobilized civilians against terrorism.

Jing Chu says the CCP blocks June 4 information to

have people forget about the truth as soon as possible.

In fact, the number of Chinese killed by the CCP during its

history is many times the death toll of the Nanjing massacre.

He asks if June 4, the Great Cultural Revolution the Great Leap

Forward etc. also need to be logged with the Register.

Jing Chu “The CCP doesn’t dare to face so many scandals

including anti-Rightist Campaign, the Cultural Revolution,

and June 4. A research study says nearly 20 million people

were killed in the Cultural Revolution.

The most tragic incident is the Great Famine following

the Great Leap Forward, causing 5.55 million deaths.

But many scholars researched that the death toll

was over 50 million."

Jing Chu believes that neither the CCP nor the Japanese

government should selectively forget history or hide the truth.

Japan invaded China on Sept. 18, 1931, and surrendered

in August 1945.

During the 15 years, over 10 million Chinese were killed.

The 1937 Nanjing massacre killed 340,000 Chinese

including soldiers and civilians.

An unknown number of Chinese women were raped.

The number of Chinese comfort women used by the

Japanese was over several hundred thousand.

After World War II, in 1952 President of Republic of China

Chiang Kai-shek signed a China-Japan Treaty of Peace.

This declared the intention to give up requesting

compensation from Japan.

In 1972, Chairman Mao Zedong published a China Japan

Joint Statement, also giving up the compensation.

In 1987, Deng Xiaoping visited Japan, and signed a Peace

Treaty.

This made legal provision to confirm the abandonment of

compensation from Japan.

Liberal scholar and commentator in Japan, Wang Jinzhong,

says Japan established a “Comfort Women Foundation."

This was to recompense the victims.

Wang Jinzhong: “Japan has a foundation for comfort women,

Korea also compensated a lot.

Many victims haven’t received it because most of the Chinese

don’t know about it.

The remaining money can’t stay there forever.

So, it was returned."

Hong Kong media Apple Daily says when the China-Japan

relationship was good, China’s civil requests for compensation

from Japan was considered “damaging to the two nations’

relationship," and were suppressed.

China’s civil organizations requesting compensation were

strictly controlled as the target of crackdown by the CCP.

Edit/LiYun Post-Production/SunNing