【新唐人2014年01月23日訊】21號，中國頂層網域名「根伺服器」出現異常，不僅《百度》、《騰訊》、《新浪》等網站無法打開，「QQ軟件」也無法使用。據了解，這是大陸的根伺服器錯誤所致。中國互聯網路信息中心表示，預計有數十萬個網站受到影響，接近中國功能變數名稱網站的三分之二，5億網民受影響。那麼「是誰導致這一網絡災難呢？請看報導。
1月21號3點20分左右，中國大陸的根伺服器DNS失效，導致網路癱瘓，包括《百度》和《騰訊》在內的中國大型互聯網服務運營商，無法使用DNS，以.COM、.INFO、.NET和.ORG為結尾的網站，也都出現無法訪問網絡。
對此，中國互聯網路信息中心（CNNIC）官方微博表示，經初步評估，這是國內通用頂層網域名的根解析出現問題所致。
據了解，DNS問題將會持續12個小時左右。
《動態網》負責人比爾•夏指出，駭客想同時攻擊和控制大陸那麼多保護嚴密的服務器，根本做不到。
《動態網》負責人比爾•夏：「能夠達到這樣大的效果，只有中共的網絡封鎖系統，它的這套系統裡面，做功能變數名稱解釋的一部分，才能夠輕而易舉的達到這個效果。」
比爾•夏還表示，中共封鎖網站所用的技術，跟功能變數名稱被劫持的技術很類似，也與這次網絡癱瘓的特徵相吻合。
其實，早在2002年9月28號，就出現DNS被劫持事件，也就是大陸門戶網站《新浪網》被直接蓋網到法輪功等網站。
《動態網》技術公司當天的報告顯示，事件是由於中國國內約50家互聯網服務供應商（ISP）的DNS遭劫持而引起的。
當時《動態網》網路技術專家董彬表示，全中國50多家不同ISP的DNS同時受到劫持，這是一項巨大的工程，一般人辦不到。但是對中共當局來說就很容易，只要一個決定，就可以通過一個中央系統來實施。
網絡上也有人通過微博揭露，這次故障是操作員失誤所致。他本想遮罩「翻牆軟件」的IP，但把IP寫到了劫持後的地址上了，造成了這次網絡的大災難。
不過，中共官媒《環球時報》卻聲稱，在故障發生後，中國使用者在訪問時，都會被跳轉到65.49.2.178的這一IP位址，也就是《動態網》（DynamicInternetTechnology）的所在地。《環球時報》還說，《動態網》公司，正是「自由門」翻牆軟體的開發者，它服務的對像包括《大紀元》、《美國之音》、《自由亞洲電臺》等，是為中國互聯網用戶提供訪問被遮罩網頁的服務。
《環球時報》記者還向「自由門」公司發出了詢問電子郵件。
比爾•夏：「這個IP是我們的。我們一開始以為是這個IP遭到了攻擊，所以我們在分析這個攻擊的特性，應該是他這種封鎖技術有錯誤造成的，影響了中國互聯網的正常運作。」
時事評論員、高級電腦工程師李善鑒：「看到這個現象恰恰是像它整個自己建立的這套機制所起的作用，而且網站被轉到《動態網》的IP去了，《動態網》IP這種操作，正好是國內封鎖網站天天打交道的事情。」
時事評論員李善鑒，也是一名高級電腦工程師，據他指出，「自由門」建立的目地就是讓中國網民看到海外真實的訊息，把中共封鎖的網站呈現給中國用戶。「自由門」當駭客與它的理念不符。
比爾•夏認為，中共的專家不會捅破他們在搞網絡封鎖，所以他們寧願承認是駭客行為。
採訪/常春 編輯/宋風 後製/李勇
Communist Hackers Paralyze Chinese Internet
On the 21st, Chinese top-level domain name (DNS) root server
malfunction has made websites such as Baidu, Tencent, and Sina
inaccessible.
China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) said an
estimated 500 million Chinese Internet users have been affected
as a result of hundreds of thousands of web sites, and nearly
two-thirds of domain names being compromised.
Exactly how has this Internet disaster occurred?
Please follow our report.
The root server failure at 3:20 AM on January 21 compromised
major Internet service providers in China such as Baidu,
Tencent, and domain names such as .com, .info, .net and .org.
The CNNIC believed the top DNS root server malfunction
has resulted in this Internet disaster.
This DNS problem will continue for 12 hours or so.
Dynaweb director Bill Xia indicates it is impossible for hackers
to attack and control highly protected servers.
Bill Xia, Dynaweb director: “This effect clearly can only be
achieved by the Communist Internet blockade system.
This system can do it through explaining domain names."
Bill Xia also says that the Communist regime has blocked
websites by hijacking domain names.
Symptoms after the hijacking are similar to the one that』s
being experienced this time.
In fact, hijacking DNS occurred as early as September 28,
2002 when Sina.com.cn was redirected to Minghui.org.
Dynaweb reported the analysis of that incident: when 50 Chinese
Internet service providers (ISP) DNS were hijacked.
Dynaweb engineer Dong Bin had explained that to hijack
50 ISP DNS at the same time is a huge project, beyond any
ordinary person’s capacity.
However, it would be fairly easy for the Communist regime.
One order will get implemented through a central system.
A Weibo post revealed that human error led to this.
The IP address intended to be hijacked was mistakenly used
and thus this Internet mishap took place.
However, the regime’s official media, Global Times, claimed
the cause of this Internet outage in China that rerouted
millions of users to a U.S. website of IP address 65.49.2.178,
was the Dynaweb or Dynamic Internet Technology (DIT).
The Global Times also reported that DIT is a company that
sells anti-censorship web services tailored for Chinese users,
including a product that enables the retrieval of microblog posts
deleted by Chinese censors.
The Epoch Times, Voice of America and Human Rights in China,
are clients of DIT, said the report.
Global Times reporter also sent an email inquiry to DIT.
Bill Xia: “It is our IP address. We thought our IP address was
attacked, so we did an analysis on this attack.
As a result, we believe it was a mistake in its blocking
that has compromised the function of the Chinese Internet."
Li Shanjian, senior computer engineer: “This phenomenon is
very typical of the censorship mechanism conducted by the regime.
This rerouting to DIT’s IP address is exactly what’s happening
in China everyday, censoring the websites."
Senior computer engineer Lee Sunjian indicates that FreeGate
was developed to reveal true information overseas to domestic
Chinese and present the censored text to Chinese Internet
users.
FreeGate has a different purpose from the hackers.
Bill Xia does not believe that the Communist IT experts
would recognize their engagement in the Internet blockade,
but rather refer to it as a cyber attack.
Interview/ChangChun Edit/SongFeng Post-Production/LiYong