【新唐人2013年10月31日訊】28號天安門汽車爆炸事件造成5死38傷，中共北京警方初步認定事件是「一起經過嚴密策劃，有組織、有預謀的暴力恐怖襲擊案件。」不過，維吾爾族組織對此否認，並且認為維吾爾人所有行為，都是對中共當局迫害後的抗爭。請看報導。
中共承認北京天安門汽車爆炸事故是恐怖襲擊案。官方報導指稱，「28日12時許,烏斯曼•艾山及其妻子母親等3人駕車闖入長安街便道，故意衝撞遊人群眾後，撞向金水橋護欄，點燃車內汽油致車輛起火燃燒，三人當場死亡。」
中共黨媒《新華社》的報導還引述北京市公安局新聞發言人的話說，「經現場勘查，北京警方查明肇事車輛為一懸掛新疆牌照吉普車。警方在車內發現有盛裝汽油的裝置，兩把砍刀，鐵棍，車上還發現有極端宗教內容的旗幟。」
警方還炫耀說，恐怖行動後僅僅10多小時，警方就抓捕了涉案的玉江山•吾許爾等其他5名嫌疑人。
外媒指出，被抓捕的5名嫌疑人中，四人是典型的維吾爾族姓名，另外一人是漢族姓名。
北京市李姓市民認為，當局如果指責他們是恐怖份子很難讓人信服，因為如果是恐怖襲擊，一個人駕一輛車才更有效。
北京市民李先生：「三個人在一個車上，這肯定是一個疑點，重大疑點。而且，到現在官方也沒有做出太多的解釋。」
《美國之音》援引重要消息人士的話表示，撞車事件可能是不滿中共新疆宗教和文化政策的一些維族人採取的自殺襲擊行動。但流亡維吾爾族領袖否認維吾爾人參與恐怖襲擊。他們指責中國的漢族統治者壓迫維族人，使他們在自己的地區成為少數族裔。
在瑞典的「世界維吾爾人大會」曾發表聲明說，「對有關事件缺乏官方透明度表示關注」。並且對事件中「有人喪生表示悲痛」，並重申﹕堅決反對任何形式的暴力活動。
「世界維吾爾人大會」發言人迪理夏提向「英國廣播公司《BBC》」中文網表示，對恐怖主義的定義，中共當局一直都有雙重標凖。
迪理夏提說，對發生恐怖事件的起因，中國缺乏自由獨立的報導，缺乏事件的真相，有待國際社會進一步調查。他還表示，中共當局每次都指責維吾爾族人，卻從來不允許媒體自由報導維吾爾人抗爭背後的原因。
在此之前，《自由亞洲電臺》等媒體指出，涉案人當中兩人有上訪記錄，其中一人的親屬在6月26號在新疆鄯善縣魯克沁鎮的一場宗教聚會中，被公安開槍射殺。6月的那次暴力事件，造成24人死亡、21人受傷，公安直接開槍打死了11人。
獨立評論員邢天行：「社會不公使這些人上訪無門，最後促成了矛盾加劇，以命來抵抗。這是社會制度和現在的政權造成的這樣的一個惡果。所以，如果這個根本東西不解決的話，這種血案和慘案就會不斷的發生。」
獨立評論員邢天行認為，這種對中共政權強烈的反抗行為，驗證了「上海殺警案」的楊佳所說的那句話，「你不給我一個說法，我就給你一個說法。」
迪理夏提還撰文指出，不管這個吉普車撞天安門案是維吾爾人幹的、還是其他甚麼人幹的，發生此類事件的根本原因是中國社會的極端不公正！是中共的獨裁非法統治造成的！
他認為，幾個月前北京首都機場國際航站發生的「冀中星爆炸案」就是前例。
新疆昌吉維權人士、權利運動發起人胡軍向媒體表示，事件都是因為肇事者走投無路才導致。胡軍認為：中共已經把老百姓逼上絕路了，這不但是跟少數民族的問題，漢族也同樣被中共逼上絕路。
採訪/陳漢 編輯/宋風 後製/葛雷
Tiananmen Crash: Terrorist Attack or Suicide Protest?
On October 28, a jeep crashed in Tiananmen Square,
which resulted in the deaths of 5 people, with 38 injured.
Beijing police have confirmed the incident
as “a violent terrorist attack which was
carefully planned, organized and premeditated.”
However, the Uighur community
denied the Chinese regime’s story.
It believes the victims were protesting the Chinese
Communist Party’s (CCP) persecution. Let’s take a look.
The CCP identified the car crashed and
subsequent fire as a terrorist attack.
The official reported said that “on October 28, at
about 12pm, Usmen Hasan with his mother and
wife drove a car into Chang’an Avenue sidewalk.
They deliberately ploughed into pedestrians,
then into Jinshui Bridge barricades.
They ignited petrol in the car, the car burst
into flames, and the three died in the car.”
State-run Xinhua News cited a Beijing police spokesman.
“Police at the site of the incident found the
vehicle is a Xinjiang-issued license plate jeep.
Police found a container for petrol, two knives, an
iron bar and a flag with extremist religious slogans.”
Police also claimed that five people connected with
the incident were caught just 10 hours after the attack.
Foreign media say that four out of the five suspects
are typical Uighur names, with one of han origin.
A Beijing resident says the regimes claim
that they are terrorists is hard to accept.
This is because if it was a terrorist attack, one
person driving one vehicle should be more effective.
Beijing resident: “Three people in one car for a terrorist
attack is a doubtful point, an important doubtful point.
The authorities haven’t given further explanation.”
Voice of America cited an inside source.
The incident is likely to be a suicide attack,
committed by Uighurs to protest the CCP’s
Xinjiang policy over their religion and culture.
The leader of Uighurs in exile denied the claim
of Uighurs having participated in a terrorist attack.
They condemned the persecuted of Uighurs who
became a minority population in their own areas.
The World Uyghur Congress issued a statement in Geneva.
The statement expresses concerns over the
Chinese regime’s lack of official transparency.
The statement expresses its profound sadness at
the loss of life in the Beijing incident, and restates
its categorical rejection of violence in all forms.
The World Uyghur Congress spokesman
Dilxat Raxit spoke to BBC Chinese website.
Raxit said the Chinese regime always uses
two standards for it’s concept of “terrorism”.
Raxit said that regarding the cause of this crash, the regime
lacks an independent report, and lacks a truthfully report.
Yet, the international community
will make further investigations.
He said that the Chinese regime always
criticizes Uighurs for each incident.
However, it never allows independent coverage
on what is the cause behind the protests.
Prior to this, Radio Free Asia said that two
of the suspects had record of petitioning.
One’s relative was killed by police on
June 26 in a religious meeting in Xinjiang.
24 people were killed, and 21 were injured in this
incident. 11 of them were killed by police gun shots.
Xing Tianxing, independent commentator:
“Social injustices have no place for appeal.
Thus, conflicts have intensified, and
people have to use their own life in protest.
The current social system and
dictatorship are the leading cause.
If fundamental problems cannot be resolved, this
kind of bloodshed and tragedy will continue to occur.”
Xing Tianxing says such strong resistance against
the CCP’s rule verifies “national hero” Yan Jia’s words.
Yang was executed for the killing of Shanghai police.
He has said, “You refuse to give me an
explanation, so I shall give you my own explanation.”
Raxit also wrote that regardless of whether the Tiananmen
crash involved Uighurs or others, the cause of the incident
is extreme injustice in China, and by the CCP’s illegal rule.”
Raxit says that a few months ago, Ji Zhongxing setting off a
bomb in Beijing Capital International Airport is an example.
Hu Jun, Xinjiang activist, and founder of
Human Rights Campaign, spoke to media.
Hu said the incidents were because of perpetrators
having nowhere to appeal for their mistreatment.
The CCP has killed many people. It is not only happening
in minority ethnic groups, but also among Han Chinese.