【新唐人2013年10月31日訊】中共「國防大學」製作的一部影片視頻，最近在網路上傳播。影片中不但講述了蘇聯、蘇共的解體，主要還批判了中共黨政官員、和知識份子以及非政府組織被美國滲透，對中共進行肢解。有評論認為，這是軍人干政的危險訊號。也有人分析，影片是想告訴中國人，共產黨解體在中國是不能發生的。也有學者反問，「又說中美現在是戰略夥伴的關係，又說是要顛覆我們，究竟那種說法是對的？」請看報導。
這部宣傳影片《較量無聲》長達90分鐘，分上、下兩集，今年6月由軍方最高學府「國防大學」製作。總製片人是「國防大學」政委、前國家主席李先念女婿劉亞洲上將。
據了解，這是第一次軍方公開製播的論政節目，影片在開篇介紹了蘇聯在美蘇冷戰期間倒臺的經過。
美國中文雜誌《中國事務》總編輯伍凡分析，中共生怕在中國出現象蘇共解體的景象，而藉此告訴人們，共產黨的下一步方向。
美國中文雜誌《中國事務》總編輯伍凡：「習近平的方向就是，他把左、中、右三派都拉起來，維持政權、維持共產主義，他生怕在中國出現蘇聯瓦解，蘇共解體，這個現象出來。所以這個電影的一開始，就把戈爾巴喬夫、葉利欽醜化了一頓，罵他們是叛徒，他們沒有堅持共產主義。」
影片中有俄羅斯首任總統葉利欽公開退出蘇共的場面。
時事評論員林子旭：「很多人看了這個視頻或許會更加期盼中共早日垮臺，看到葉利欽公開退出蘇共的場面，我相信很多人的內心必然要受到震動。」
外界普遍認為，葉利欽最大的功績有三點：一是他退出共產黨﹔二是他解體了蘇共﹔最後他開創了一個民主進程，這個進程不但給俄羅斯，也給蘇聯解體後的世界歷史進程產生重大影響。
時事評論員林子旭認為，視頻如果在早些年推出來，或許還能蠱惑人心，但是今天拿出來翻炒，效果恰恰相反。
林子旭：「這個視頻不是通過官方媒體，而是通過網路來炒作，其很有可能是中共黨內某一派系所為，這應該是中共十八屆三中全會之前黨內權鬥升級的一種表現，視頻企圖通過抬出鄧小平，來警告黨內想要在三中全會有所突破的官員，不要輕舉妄動，否則蘇共就是下場。」
影片描述蘇聯垮臺後美國戰略目標的轉移，指責美國企圖用5條戰線顛覆中國，包括政治滲透、文化滲透、思想滲透、組織滲透、政治干涉和社會滲透。
但中國近代史學者章立凡對香港《明報》表示，影片的拍攝是軍方出於利益的考慮。他認為，只有將中美關係這種「顛覆」、或是「陰謀論」說得極致，才能夠爭取更多的國防預算撥款。至於影片中所描述的中美關係，許多都是似是而非，他反問，「又說美國現在是戰略夥伴的關係，又說是要顛覆我們，究竟那種說法是對的？如果說美國要顛覆中國，那為何中共的高官要把他們的錢、把家人都送到美國呢，做臥底嗎？」
也有網友（Hok Kut Wong）提出﹕既然如此， 中國為甚麼要買那麼多的美債，並且是美國的最大債主? 這不是「資敵」嗎?!
林子旭分析，影片的功效是欺騙老百姓，因為目前中國社會危機四伏、矛盾重重，老百姓對中共怨聲載道，中共巧妙的將這些民怨轉嫁給了美國。
林子旭：「這個視頻很巧妙的把中共導致這些社會問題的罪責，轉嫁給了美國，試圖讓老百姓把怨氣釋放在美國身上，這樣中共就可以獲得一些喘息的機會。」
《較量無聲》這部影片還公開批判有些政府部門，「利用國家資源為西方思想文化滲透鳴鑼開道」。香港《蘋果日報》評論，既然中國的「文化領域、黨政機構如此不潔，是不是要再來一次文革的軍管、支左？」
採訪編輯/常春 後製/陳建銘
Can Any Signs be Seen in the Chinese Military Documentary?
Recently, a video produced by China’s PLA National
Defense University (NDU) circulated online.
It shows how the Soviet Union collapsed and criticizes
members of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP),
intellectuals and non-governmental organizations, for being
infiltrated by the US, causing disintegration to the CCP.
Commentators believe that it is a dangerous signal that
the military is intervening in politics.
Analysts say that the film tells Chinese people
that the CCP’s collapse will not happen in China.
Some scholars question the film’s assertion that China
and the US are strategy partners;
but the film also states that the US wants to subvert China.
Which one is correct?
Let’s take a look.
The propaganda film, Silence Contest, is 90 minutes
with two parts.
It was produced in June by the highest military institution,
NDU.
The chief producer is NDU’s Political Commissar,
General Liu Yazhou, son of Li Xiannian, former vice chairman of the CCP.
Sources say that this is the first time the military openly
produced a film for a political program.
At the beginning, the film explains how the Soviet Union
collapsed during the US-Soviet Cold War.
Wu Fan, chief editor of US-based Chinese magazine,
China Affairs, analyzes that the CCP is worried it will
collapse like the communist Soviet Union.
The film foretells the CCP’s next move.
Wu Fan: “Xi Jinping’s direction is to unite leftists, neutralists,
and rightists in order to maintain power and socialism.
They show fear regarding the Soviet Union’s collapse
and the communist collapse appearing in China.
Thus at the beginning of the film, they defamed
Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin, calling them traitors,
as these men didn’t insist on communism.”
The film shows Russian first President Yeltsin openly
quitting communist Soviet.
Lin Zixu, current affairs commentator: “Many people likely
hope the CCP will collapse soon after watching the video.
I believe the scene where Yeltsin quit the communist party
will touch many people’s hearts.”
Observers believe that Yeltsin made three great achievements:
quitting the communist party; ending the communist Soviet
Union; and initiating the democracy process,
which not only influenced Russia
but also progressed Russian history.
Lin Zixu says that if the video had been launched years
earlier, it would have brainwashed some people’s minds.
However, stirring it up today has just the opposite effect.
Lin “This video is promoted through network websites
but not state-run media.
It is likely manipulated by one faction of the CCP.
It indicates the intensified struggle within the party
before the CCP’s Third Plenary Sessions.
The film intends to use Deng Xiaoping to warn party
officials who want to make a breakthrough not to move
casually, otherwise, what happened to communist Soviet
Union is the outcome.”
The film describes how after the Soviet Union collapsed,
the US strategic goals shifted.
The film claimed that the US intends to subvert China
in five ways including infiltrating politics, culture, thought,
organizations, political intervention and the society.
Zhang Lifan, modern Chinese history scholar, told Hong
Kong’s Ming Pao that the film shows the viewpoint
of military interests.
Zhang says that by saying Sino-US relations are extremely
subversive and by using conspiracy theory excuses,
more defense funds can be obtained.
Regarding the relationship between China and the US
mentioned in the film, many points are groundless.
Zhang questioned the part where the film mentioned that
Sino-US are strategy partners.
And then the film also said that the US wants
to subvert China.
Which one is correct?
If the US wants to subvert China, why did the high-level
CCP officials transfer their money and family to the US?
Do they do it for espionage events?”
Netizen Hok Kut Wong: “If it is the case,
why did China buy so much US debt?
Why did China become the US’s largest debt holder?
Does China fund its enemy?”
Lin Zixu says the film is being used to deceive civilians.
Currently, China’s social crises are everywhere,
and there are many contradictions.
Civilians are complaining about the CCP, thus the CCP
cunningly diverted the complaints to the US.
Lin: “The film cunningly transfers the social problems
caused by the CCP onto the US.
They are trying to get Chinese people to blame the US.
Thus the CCP can obtain a chance to breathe.”
Silent Contest openly criticized governmental organs,
claiming they, “used national resources to infiltrate
with Western ideology and cultures in order to pave the road.”
Hong Kong’s Apple Daily reported that if “cultural,
party and governmental organs are so dirty, does another
Cultural Revolution military control system need
to be launched to support the leftist movement?”