【新唐人2013年08月07日訊】8月5號，中共喉舌《人民日報》海外版在頭版發表了署名馬鍾成的文章，題為《「憲政」本質上是一種輿論戰武器》。文章聲稱，「憲政」是美國瓦解社會主義的所謂武器，並警告蘇聯的解體與實施憲政有密切相關。不過，同樣是黨媒的《學習時報》卻提倡政治體制改革。評論人士斥責了馬鍾成的所謂憲政「瓦解論」，並指出，中共目前體制內已經失控，黨媒輿論分裂，各派各為其主進行激烈鬥爭，加速了中共的解體。
作者馬鍾成在文章中，將「社會主義憲政」批評為「複雜而精妙的理論陷阱」，指稱憲政和社會主義無法兼容。
文章還對美國進行了「文革式」的批評，文章指稱，美國宣傳資本主義，利用共產主義的叛徒去顛覆社會主義國家。
時事評論員任百鳴：「中共官媒也開始把憲政扣上亡黨和反華的帽子，說明其真正懼怕的，是憲政後的『變天』，而且它們已經聞到了這種滅亡的氣息。
針對馬鍾成的論調，曾就職於中共國務院辦公廳的曹思源先生提出反對意見。他認為，馬鍾成在煽動冷戰思維，實際上，全世界都需要憲政民主。
曾就職於國務院辦公廳曹思源：「這種觀點，就是重新煽動冷戰思維，憲政全世界都需要，而不是說中國就需要。有獨裁，要專制，這個我們已經吃夠了苦頭，反右派鬥爭，反右傾機會主義，文化大革命，害慘了中國人呢。所以我們不要搞專政。」
六、七十年代的人們很難忘記，所謂的[美帝國主義]以及「反華勢力」，充斥在所有的教科書中。
馬鍾成的文章還拋出了所謂的憲政「瓦解論」，指稱當年的戈爾巴喬夫、葉利欽等人，就是以憲政理論為武器……取消了蘇共的執政地位，最終瓦解了蘇聯。
這種憲政「瓦解論」，引發網友強烈反擊，在網路上有數萬人參與討論。
就在《人民日報》刊文大批憲政的時候，同為黨媒的《學習時報》則大呼「執政黨要勇於、善於推進政治體制改革。」
對此，香港《蘋果日報》發表評論文章指出，中共媒體發生輿論分裂，對特別強調槍桿子、筆桿子的中共來說，顯示了中共高層的權鬥公開化。文章認為，這場輿論大戰的背景，是薄熙來案即將開庭，以及北戴河會議將討論的經濟改革政策，再加上中共前黨魁江澤民和胡錦濤的插手，以及涉及習近平和劉雲山之間的輿論導向博弈。
評論還認為，目前中共官媒隔空開戰，是各為其主。並預計涉及到輿論戰、人事戰、增量利益大餅的瓜分戰，將新一輪的權鬥，將至少持續三個月，一直到三中全會舉行。
前《南方週報》主筆笑蜀的看法很明確。他向《法國國際廣播電臺》表示，反憲政，反公民社會，是因為中共體制內存在著一種納粹的力量。不過，笑蜀同時指出，目前，中共這個體制已經急劇地發生了分化，中國社會是一個失控的社會，尤其包括體制對其體制內部的失控。
任百鳴：「中共的所謂保守派，或者自由派，他們實際上內心都非常的複雜，他們自己都知道，是在一條將沉的破船上比試武功，勝與負都顯得如此的無聊，但是，權力爭奪一向是中共體制本能的驅動，中共各派還在激烈的內鬥，這也恰恰反應出，中共解體前的一段特有的混戰期。」
任百鳴認為，當局在現行的保黨思維中，所謂爭論、纏鬥，都不過是一種滅亡前的助燃，是絕望中的本能反應。
任百鳴：「中共官場集中表現出的是中共解體前夕的人心躁動、絕望心態。其實，問題的核心，不是施行憲政將會亡黨的問題，核心是只有中共解體才有中國的明天，才有中國的真正憲政。中國社會的一切復甦也都將在中共解體之後萌發，這是大前提。」
任百鳴指出，中共解體是天意，也是中國傳統文化中「善惡有報」的應證。
採訪編輯/常春 後製/李勇
Chinese Communist Party Media Divided Over Reports on a Constitutional System
On August 5, the overseas edition of People’s Daily,
a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) media source,
published an article written by Ma Zhongcheng.
The article criticized the ideology of the constitutional system.
It claimed that the constitutional system is a
“weapon" used by the US to destroy socialism.
It also warned that the Soviet Union’s collapse is closely
related to the implementation of the constitutional system.
However, another party-controlled media, the Study Times,
takes a different angle, and advocated political reforms.
Commentators condemned Ma Zhongcheng, and pointed
out that the CCP’s internal system has lost its control.
Party media is openly separated with its opinions.
There is an intensification of different factions struggling
for power, and it can only speed up the CCP’s collapse.
Ma Zhongcheng criticized the
constitutional system as a complex trap.
He claimed that the ideology of a constitutional
system is not compatible with socialism.
Ma mimicked Cultural Revolution tones to criticize the US.
He claimed that the US promotes capitalism, using
communist traitors to subvert socialist countries.
Ren Baiming, current affairs commentator:
“The CCP media began to allege that constitutional
system can collapse the CCP and goes against China.
It indicates the most fearful issue for the CCP is to be
thrown out, after implementation of constitutional system.
The CCP has sensed such an atmosphere."
Regarding Ma’s article, Cao Siyuan, whom previously
served in the State Council, has raised objections.
Cao said Ma is inciting a Cold War mentality, and
actually, the world needs a constitutional democracy.
Cao Siyuan: “His attitude is to incite a Cold War mentality.
It is not only China, the world that
needs constitutional democracy.
We have suffered enough from dictatorship and tyranny.
The anti-rightist and Cultural Revolution campaigns
have brutally persecuted the Chinese people.
Thus, we don’t need dictatorship."
Chinese people experienced these
campaigns in the 1960s and 1970s.
The so-called “American Imperialism", as well as
“Anti-China Forces", are written in all the textbooks.
Ma Zhongcheng has also classified the
constitutional system as “collapse theory".
Ma took Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin as examples.
He claimed both used the constitutional system as
a “weapon", to remove the Soviet Union’s power.
Finally, this made it collapse.
Ma Zhongcheng’s article instigated criticism from netizens.
Several tens of thousands of
netizens joined the discussion.
While the People’s Daily criticized the constitutional system,
the state media Study Times had an opposite point of view.
“The ruling party should be brave, and
be good to carry out political reform."
In this regard, Hong Kong’s Apple
Daily published an editorial article.
It highlighted that the divide between China’s state media
indicates high-level power struggles have openly intensified.
Apple Daily suggests that the background behind the
contradiction in the media is Bo Xilai’s upcoming trial.
It is also the Beidaihe meeting, which
will discuss economic reform policies.
This is coupled with Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao intervening.
There is also the struggle between Xi Jinping and
Liu Yunshan on the guidance of public opinion.
The article also indicates that CCP state
media struggled for its own power.
The article speculates that various struggles will continue for
at least three months, until the Third Plenary Session opens.
Xiao Shu, a former writer for , commented.
He told Radio France Internationale that the reason
for going against the constitutional system, and
against civil society, is because within the CCP
system exists an extreme authoritarian force.
The CCP system now has increasingly divided.
Chinese society is out of control, particularly
the internal system has lost control of itself.
Ren Baiming: “The minds of the CCP’s so-called
conservatives or liberals are actually very complicated.
They know they are on a sinking ship, but still fight with each
other, which is meaningless, as it doesn’t matter who wins.
However, these power struggle have
always been a driving force in the CCP.
There is still a lot of fierce infighting
between the CCP’s different factions.
This precisely reflects the CCP’s unique
chaotic struggle before it collapses."
Ren Baiming said that the different
factions hope the CCP will survive.
However, infighting can only be
a fuel to speed up its collapse.
It is an act of desperation.
Ren Baiming: “The CCP official circle shows their
restlessness, and desperation before it collapses.
Actually, the main issue is not whether a
constitutional system is implemented or not.
The main issue is that only by removing the CCP,
can China have a future and a constitutional system.
All the recovery of Chinese society will take place
after the CCP collapses. This is an essential condition."
Ren Baiming suggests that the
CCP’s collapse is heavens will.
It is also the Chinese traditional belief in retribution,
in that “good is rewarded, and evil is punished."