【新唐人2013年05月25日訊】中共媒體分別在週二、週三發表一連串文章，圍攻憲政的提法。不僅聲稱憲政理念兜圈子，否定了中國發展之路，還重申所謂的「中國夢」就是中國特色的社會主義夢，是「宇宙真理」，要求信仰黨性就如同基督徒信仰上帝。這一反常態度引起外界的強烈反彈和駁斥。

繼週二《紅旗文稿》刊登署名文章後，週三，官媒《環球時報》緊接著發表社評，攻擊「憲政」是兜圈子，是用新說法提出中國接受西方制度的老要求。

《人民日報》也在週三刊發文章，拋出了「黨性神性論」，就是﹕黨員相信黨性如同基督徒相信上帝。同一天，《解放軍報》發文宣稱，「我們信仰的主義，乃是宇宙的真理」。

中共媒體的這一態度，在中國學術界和社交媒體上引發了激烈辯論。有網友說：中共終於公開承認自己是個宗教了。有不少網友還轉發了2001年3月29號，《人民日報》批判法輪功的文章截圖，以大笑的微博表情，暗諷中共才是真正的邪教。

中國問題專家、社會觀察學者戴晴：「我覺得這幫傻帽都瘋了，他們就想討好習近平。都瘋了，說的都甚麼瘋話呀，說出來都不嫌丟人！原來的甚麼毛澤東思想戰略、甚麼偉大萬歲，那都舊詞兒，沒用了，編新詞兒，可是這新詞兒出來對今天普通的百姓沒有任何意義，就是說夢話！」

「中國政法大學」法學院副院長何兵在網上表示，竟然有人公開喊﹕人治優於法治。

中國憲政學者陳永苗：「130對於普通老百姓、對於西方世界或整個歷史來說，這種政體是不是好的，他們不考慮這些問題。256 我覺得它說了甚麼並不重要，最重要的是你得緊緊的抓住它，它想幹甚麼，它想騙住你，想維護自己的權力，它想搞法西斯主義，它想維護它的統治地位，它想把自己塑造成這個國家的主人。」

「北京大學」法學院教授、中國憲法學會副會長張千帆，22號也在微博上表示：有人要搞二次「文革」。

近代史學者章立凡在微博上留言說﹕讀罷「新兩報一刊」的四篇爛文，不少朋友驚呼「文革」將捲土重來，我送他們一段馬克思的語錄：「黑格爾在某個地方說過，一切偉大的世界歷史事變和人物，可以說都出現兩次，他忘記補充一點：第一次是作為悲劇出現，第二次是作為笑劇出現。」

大陸民主人士馬玉忠：「他（習近平）要走這條路下去，他就是亡國之君，這是必然的。目前把憲政掐斷了、把這個門關上了，這是極端錯誤的。正因為這樣，他們讓這種悲劇重演的可能性，造成了良好的土壤和環境。文革這種悲劇有可能重演。」

不過，中國憲政學者陳永苗則表示了不同看法。

陳永苗：「他們是不會搞文革的。包括薄熙來和習近平，他們不可能像毛澤東那樣，動用體制外的力量，動用群眾的力量，來打破官僚體制。他不外乎是為官僚體制修修補補，加點潤滑油。第二個，現有的政治、經濟全球化的條件，他已經沒辦法再搞文革了。還有一個理由是，毛澤東那個時代是個封閉式的，信息是閉塞的。是可以搞文革的。」

此外，對於「中國人民大學」法學教授楊曉青週三發表的文章，「憲政屬於資本主義，而不屬於中國式的社會主義」，「中國人民大學」旗下的「中國憲政網」發表了多名中國著名法學學者的文章，反駁了這一說法。

一名網友在網上回應說，「憲政與社會主義制度不符」，這個論斷本身是正確的。實踐已經證明，所謂的「社會主義」是人類歷史的垃圾，說憲政和社會主義制度不符，恰恰反映了現在以及歷史上各個社會主義國家的真實面目。

採訪/田淨 編輯/王子琦 後製/郭敬

A Second Cultural Revolution? Official Media Publish Four Articles Criticizing Constitutionalism.

Chinese Communist Party (CCP) state media published

a series of articles on Tuesday and Wednesday.

The articles claimed criticized

the concept of constitutionalism.

Constitutionalism is said to ‘beat about the bush’,

and negates China’s road to development.

The articles referred to the “China Dream”,

consisting of socialism with Chinese characteristics.

This was referred to as the ‘truth of the universe’,

and a request was made to all party members to

treat the party character as a Christian treats God.

These articles caused a strong reaction,

and criticized by the international community.

After “Red Flag Presentation” (Hongqi Wengao)

published an article on Tuesday, official media

“Global Times" immediately published an editorial.

The article claimed “constitutionalism” ‘beat about

the bush’, and is simply using new words to try

to convince China to accept a western system.

“People’s Daily" also published an article on Wednesday.

This discussed the “party character vs divinity”,

which means party members belief in the party

character is like Christians belief in God.

On the same day, “Liberation Army” published an article,

claiming “the doctrine we believe is the truth of the universe”.

This triggered a hot debate in China’s academic

field, as well as on China social media.

Some netizen said that finally, the CCP

admitted publicly that it’s a regime.

Many netizens posted pages from a

March 29, 2001 edition of “People’s Daily",

In this edition, there was an article criticizing

Falun Gong, and claiming it to be a cult.

Netizens forwarded the article, to

indicate that the real cult is the CCP.

Dai Qing, China expert: “I think this gang of people are crazy.

The only thing they want to do is curry favor with Xi Jinping.

All of them are crazy. Their words are crazy,

as they didn’t feel ashamed to say these words.

In that past, Mao Zedong’s strategic thinking

was used, and so these can’t be used any more.

But the new words they created have no

meaning for today’s people. It is nonsense.”

He Bing, the Deputy Dean of the Law School, China

University of Political Science commented online.

There are even people exclaiming that being

ruled by people is better than being ruled by law.

Chen Yongmiao, China constitutional scholar:

“Consider ordinary Chinese people, as well as the

western world, and also taking history into account.

The CCP didn’t consider any of this. They don’t think

about it. I think what has been said isn’t important.

The most important thing is to grasp what it wants

to do. It wants to cheat you to maintain its power.

It wants to engage in military doctrine.

It wants to maintain its ruling regime. It wants

to portray itself as the leader of the country.”

Zhang Qianfan, Vice President of Chinese Constitutional

Association, and professor from the Law School at

Peking University, commented in a microblog on May 22.

There appears to be some who want

to launch a second “Cultural Revolution”.

Zhang Lifan, a modern history scholar

also commented in his microblog.

After reading these four ugly articles of the “new two

newspapers and one magazine”, many friends

proclaimed that there is another “Cultural Revolution”.

I want to give them a sentence of Carl Marx.

“Hegel said that in some place, all great events

and people in the world history appear twice.

He forgot one more thing: the first appearance

was a tragedy, and the second was a farce.”

Ma Yuzhong, a Democrat from Mainland China,

“[Xi Jinping] wants to take this road, and it’s fatal

that he will become the ‘subjugation of the king’.

At present, it’s extremely wrong to kill

a constitution, and to close this door.

It creates good grounds, and a ripe environment

for a tragedy. The Cultural Revolution may repeat.”

However, China constitutional scholar

Chen Yongmiao has a different view.

Chen Yongmiao: “They won’t

begin a new Cultural Revolution.

This includes Bo Xilai and Xi Jinping.

They are unable to behave like Mao Zedong,

and use force from within the system, that is,

the force of the people to break bureaucracy.

The thing they will do is repair bureaucracy, and to oil it.

The second thing, is that in the current global

political and economic conditions, it is unable

to launch a Cultural Revolution any more.

Yet another reason is that in Mao Zedong’s era, the

whole system was closed, and information was blocked.

This is the reason that it can launch the Cultural Revolution.”

In addition, Yang Xiaoqing, a professor from

the Law School of China People’s University,

published an article on Wednesday.

“Constitutionalism is a kind of capitalism, which

isn’t part of socialism with Chinese characteristics”.

But many famous Chinese famous legal scholars

published articles on the “Chinese Constitutional”

website of China People’s University, to refute this claim.

A netizen responded online. “Constitutionalism

is incompatible with a socialist system”.

The comment, itself is correct. In light of history,

it has been proved that “socialism" does not work.

It highlights the real facts from each socialist country,

both during history, and currently in the world.