【新唐人2013年05月07日訊】香港《新世紀》出版社即將出版一本新書，重新審度「林彪事件」，它挑戰「中共黨史二卷」中對「林彪事件」的傳統定義。歷史學者援引1983年的秘辛指出，林彪並未死在飛機上，而是被8341部隊用火箭炮打死。學者也指出，中共編纂的歷史，只是為了它的統治合法性所編織的一件外衣。
這本名為《九一三回望——林彪事件史實與辨析》的新書，試圖通過很多首次公開的文件，來證實中共當局漏洞百出，難以自圓其說的說法。英國《星期日泰晤士報》報導說，這本新書「摧毀了」第二卷黨史中關於「林彪事件的定性」。
由中共總書記習近平主導編撰的中共黨史二卷，在二年前出版，中共在黨史中繼續指控林彪有兩大陰謀罪狀，包括：「試圖刺殺毛澤東、並試圖在華南另立政府。」
根據中共的說法，被選定為毛澤東的繼承人，十大元帥之一的林彪，1971年9月13號，與妻兒同乘的專機在蒙古境內墜毀，機上人員全部死亡。
而1983年，在美國出版了一本英文版的《林彪的陰謀和死亡》，香港《遠東評論出版社》同年8月翻譯為《林彪之死——流產政變幕後秘辛》。
書中表示，林彪與妻子葉群，是參加了毛澤東精心安排的晚宴後，被火箭打死的，而在溫都爾汗墜毀的飛機，則是林彪之子林立果所乘坐，中央文件公布的墜機現場照片出於偽造。
這本書描述說，9月12號晚8點，林彪、葉群抵達毛澤東在北京西山的「玉泉山」別墅赴宴。宴會之後乘車離開。晚11點整，毛的別墅內外接連聽見兩次巨大的爆炸聲。這是埋伏在附近的8341部隊的爆破小組，將火箭彈打到林彪汽車，汽車有好幾部分在火焰裡飛向空中。前座的兩個人被炸得粉碎。
原「北京大學」歷史系教授蘇明，對書中林彪之死的說法表示相信。
原北京大學歷史系教授蘇明：「這個時候，林立果就在北京西園機場那裏，一架直升機等著他父母出來，結果聽說爆炸了。他才飛到山海關，開著那架所謂的英國買的飛機，最後他跑的。這時候才把他打下來。就在炸死林彪夫婦以後，不到一個月的時間，當時參加這次殺林彪夫婦特種部隊的四十個人，就紛紛的都秘密死亡了。」
原首都師範大學副教授李元華表示，中共編纂的歷史，核心點在於統治的合法性。但中共的歷史有許多地方完全顛覆史實。
李元華：「實際上因為中共它不是一個民選的政府，政黨也是以反陰謀，搞集權搞鬥爭出名的。所以他為了維護自己的政權，一直在篡改一些歷史，去說明它是中國社會如何需要它，它對中國社會有多大的貢獻。實際上這整個和歷史是相反的。」
蘇明表示，中共給學生灌輸的歷史觀、和人類社會演化的過程，就是「謊言」，中共對「抗日」和「內戰」的敘述，更是違反史實。
蘇明：「為甚麼長征呢？是因為他們要抗日，國民黨不讓他們抗日。所以他們努力北上長征。這件事在我十幾歲，讀中學的時候，歷史課就這麼講，那時候我就很奇怪，我說，我知道那個時候日本是在山海關一帶，你北上抗日，你怎麼跑西北去了？那個時候我就有這個懷疑。你實際是逃跑。」
為新書《九一三回望》作序的美國哈佛大學教授馬若德（Roderick MacFarquhar）也表示，林彪早在中共的「九大」期間，就與毛澤東要把「文化大革命」進行到底的思想發生了矛盾。由於林彪主張優先發展生產力，而毛澤東恐懼林彪在軍隊中的威望與影響，隨即開始肅清林彪的勢力，最終設置圈套，迫使林彪就範。
採訪編輯秦雪後製李月
Hong Kong Book Challenges Chinese Communist Party
Definition Of Lin Biao’s Death
New Century Press in Hong Kong is about to publish
a book that reassesses the “Lin Biao Incident”.
It challenges the traditional definition of the “Lin Biao Incident”
in Volumes II of History of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Historians quoted 1983’s secret information that Lin Biao’s
plane was hit by a rocket launched by the 8341 Troop.
Scholars point out the CCP compiles history
like weaving a tapestry to make it legitimate.
The book is titled Looking Back at 9.13 – The Historical Facts
And Analysis Of The Lin Biao Incident(Looking Back at 9.13).
It tries to use public documents to prove the loopholes in the
CCP’s explanation of the incident.
UK’s Sunday Times newspaper reports that this new book
“destroys the traditional definition of the “Lin Biao Incident”.
Volumes II of History of the CCP was published two years ago,
with CCP’s general party secretary as the chief-editor.
It continues to charge Lin Biao of two main crimes: Assassinate
Mao Zedong and try to set up a government in South China.
According to the CCP, Lin Biao, heir of Mao Zedong
and one of the top ten Marshalls,
died with his wife, son and all crew on September 13,
1971 in a plane crash in Mongolia.
In 1983, a book was published in the U.S.,
titled Conspiracy And Death of Lin Biao.
Far Eastern Review Press of Hong Kong translated
the book and published it in August, 1983.
It was titled The Death of Lin Biao – Behind the Scene
Secrets of A failed Coup.
The book indicates Lin Biao and his wife Ye Qun were shot
by a rocket after attending the dinner arranged by Mao.
Lin Biao’s son Lin Liguo was on the plane that crashed in
Mongolia. The CCP’s pictures of the crash site were fabricated.
According to the book, at 8pm on September 12, 1971,
Lin Biao and Ye Qun arrived for dinner at
Mao Zedong’s Yuquan Mountain Villa in Beijing’s
Western Hills. Following the dinner, they left.
At 11 o’clock that night, people within the villa heard
two loud explosions.
The ambush team of the 8341 Troop shot rockets into
Lin Biao’s car, which exploded Flames shot up in the air.
The two people in the front seat were blown to pieces.
Former Beijing University professor Su Ming
said that he believed what the book states.
Su Ming: “Lin Liguo was waiting with a helicopter
at Beijing West Park Airport for his parents.
He heard of the explosion, so he flew to Shanhaiguan.
He got on a plane, apparently purchased from
the UK and took off. He was shot.
Less than a month after Lin Biao and his wife died, more than
forty people who participated in killing Lin Biao died secretly.
Former Beijing Normal University associate professor Li
Yuanhua said the CCP made up history to keep its legitimacy.
There are many lies in history written by the CCP.
Li Yuanhuan: “The CCP is not an elected government.
It is famous for conspiracy and power struggle.
In order to maintain its regime, it has been making up facts
how the Chinese society needs it, how it contributes to China.
In fact, these are opposite to history.”
Su Ming expressed that the CCP brainwashes students
with its views (lies) on history and civilization.
The CCP’s statements on the Anti-Japanese War
and Civil War are against historic facts.
Su Ming: “Why did the CCP do Long March?
Because they wanted to fight against the Japanese.
The KMT did not let them fight against the Japanese.
So they marched northward. This is what I learned at school.
I found it very strange back then. The Japanese were
in the Northeast. Why did they run to the Northwest?
I figured that it was the CCP who escaped away.”
Harvard University Professor Roderick MacFarquhar who
wrote the preface of “Looking Back at 9.13” also said,
as early as the CCP’s 9th Congress, Lin Biao had conflicts
with Mao Zedong’s effort to push the “Cultural Revolution.
Lin Biao advocated the development of productivity.
Mao was afraid of his prestige and influence in the army.
Mao started to eliminate the power of Lin Biao,
and ultimately set the trap to get rid Lin Biao.