【新唐人2013年04月22日訊】在雅安地震發生後的第一時間，「中國紅十字會」就在它的微博發佈了賑災信息。不過，這個曾在「汶川地震」中，作為民間主要捐款平臺的組織，似乎並沒有從民眾質疑的陰影中走出。信息發佈3小時之內，竟然收到了2萬多條內容為「滾」字的回覆。
雅安大地震發生後，「中國紅十字會總會」第一時間在官方微博宣佈﹕捐贈500個帳篷救災。但換來的卻是超過600個喝倒彩的「倒豎大拇指」圖示，整個留言板充滿網友喊「滾」的字眼，「大陸紅十字會」索性關閉評論功能，不再讓大陸網友發言。
旅美中國問題研究人士 張健：「民間對擁有官方背景的慈善機構都是嗤之以鼻，因為紅十字會包括其他的公益組織大量的動用了民間的力量，然後中飽私囊，所有的錢來路從來不公開，花法也不透明，這在有智慧的網民面前，它變成一個黑洞。」
多年來，「紅十字會」一直被質疑侵吞善款。公眾對2008年「汶川地震」數十億捐助款的去向表示質疑，其中相當一部分是由「中國紅十字會」負責管理。
據了解，國際上大多數「紅十字會」的組織運營都獨立於政府之外。而「中國紅十字會」卻與政府有著密切的關係。幾十年來，「紅十字會」一直是衛生部的下屬機構。官方允許從中國民眾募捐的幾個屈指可數的組織中，「中國紅十字會」是其中之一。
大陸異議作家 陳樹慶：「中國大陸的紅十字會是一個典型的官方機構，它的道德底線肯定受到中共官場上道德底線的影響，對善款的使用不遵守捐款人的願望，對老百姓的濟貧護困的慈善之心，見義勇為的尚善之心傷害都是很大的。」
網友爆料：「汶川大地震」時，北京某餐廳一個善良的老闆知道捐錢沒用，就聯繫「紅十字會」，準備捐十萬人民幣買暖水袋支援災區，但紅十字會回覆﹕暖水袋一個27元。這老闆就自己買，一問，才幾塊錢一個。然後請紅十字會在汶川的人員派發，對方說幫忙可以，但是派一個收取10元手續！
張健：「在中共這個體制下，催生出各式各樣的奇奇怪怪的官僚體制，想盡各種辦法去盤剝人民，尤其在天災人禍面前，他們更加是不遺餘力的去做這些事情。」
張健還提醒大家，雅安的這次地震，又有可能被中共「喪事當成喜事辦」，把民眾痛苦的時刻，當作中共親民愛民的表演時機。
另外，民間組織去雅安救援的志願者遭到中共當局的阻截甚至關押。據了解，「六四天網」創始人黃琦和「天網」義工蒲飛親自組團前往災區救災，卻被當局拘捕。
「天網」義工 刑鑑：「當時的情況非常緊急吧，他發的字數非常少，總共就六個字，攔截、遭拘、公開。他（蒲飛）的手機處於關機狀態，黃琦先生的手機處於被限制狀態。」
張健指出，中共徹底摧毀了中國傳統文化後，不僅在國內造成各種難以收拾的人倫亂象，這些失去道德底線的大陸人，來到海外也造成國際社會對大陸人另眼相看。當地政府在很多公共場所，用簡體字標出有關「遵守公共道德」的提示。
張健：「酒店或甚麼地方，你都會看到用中文對華人的這種警告，你能說他是侮辱你嗎﹖其實不是，因為中國人在海外或者在全世界其他地區，他確實做了許多讓人感覺不舒服的事情，但是我們要想一想，為甚麼這樣，是因為這個政體它摧毀了中華文明，他根本就不知溫、廉、恭、儉、讓，他已經忘記了中華民族的道德。」
中國經濟學家郎咸平認為，「中國紅十字會」，利用「紅十字」的名義，侵吞善款，無償圈地，獻血洗錢，「紅十字會」各級領導應該辭職。
採訪編輯/劉惠 後製/葛雷
20,000 Netizens to China Red Cross – “Take a Hike!”
After Ya’an earthquake occurred, China Red Cross reacted
immediately with disaster relief information on its microblog.
However, the group served as the main “non-governmental”
donation platform after Wenchuan earthquake.
Yet, it failed to recover its reputation
among the Chinese people.
In three hours, over 20,000 comments saying, “Take a Hike!”
were posted by Chinese netizens on its microblog.
After Ya’an earthquake, China Red Cross announced on its
microblog that 500 tents will be donated to disaster relief.
The announcement received over 600 “thumbs-down” clicks.
The whole message board was filled with comments
like, “Take a Hike!” by the netizens.
China Red Cross then simply disabled comments
to stop netizens from leaving messages.
Zhang Jian (China-issues observer, US): ”The Chinese
can sniff any charity with an official background.
China Red Cross and other public interest organizations
massively collected donations from Chinese people to fill their own pockets.
They never tell the public where the collected funds are
and how are they used.
They look like black holes to any thinking netizen.”
Over the years, China Red Cross has been criticized
for appropriating donations.
The public seriously questioned where the billions
of donations went after the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake,
and when China Red Cross was in charge
of managing a considerable part of the money.
Globally, most Red Cross organizations are operated
independently from the government.
However, China Red Cross has close connections
with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) authority.
It has been a subordinate body of the Ministry of Health
for several decades.
It is also one of the very few organizations that are allowed
to collect donations by the CCP authority.
Chen Shuqing (Chinese dissident, Writer):
”China Red Cross is a typical official institution.
Therefore its moral base line has to be consistent
with that of the CCP’s official circles.
For example, it does not follow donators’ requests
on how to spend the money.
This has greatly hurt those with compassion
to help the poor, or courage to do the right thing.”
A netizen told a story of a Beijing restaurant owner
who wished to help after the Wenchuan earthquake.
He knew that donating money directly would not work.
Therefore he contacted China Red Cross to donate
RMB 100,000 worth of hot water bags.
However, China Red Cross responded
with the price of RMB27 per bag.
The owner decided to purchase the bags himself,
Learning that the market price per bag is only several Yuan.
When he asked the Red Cross to distribute the bags for him,
they said he had to pay RMB10 per bag commission!
Zhang Jian: ”CCP’s regime has nurtured bureaucracies,
which spare no effort to exploit people.
Natural disasters and human foes only motivate them
to do this even more.”
Zhang warned that Ya’an earthquake will probably give
CCP another chance to “handle a funeral as a happy event.”
The party may again stage a performance of “caring about
Chinese people” from the earthquake victims’ suffering.
In addition, true rescue volunteers have been intercepted
or even detained by the CCP on their way to Ya’an.
It is learned that founder of 64tianwang.org, Huang Qi,
and volunteer Pu Fei had formed a rescue team for Ya’an, but were arrested by authorities.
Xing Jian (Volunteer, 64tianwang.org):
”They must’ve been in an urgent situation.
He (Pu Fei) only sent six characters (in Chinese) saying,
“Stopped and arrested; spread the news.”
His cell phone was then disconnected,
and Mr. Huang Qi’s cell phone was also restricted.”
Zhang Jian remarked that CCP’s complete destruction
of traditional culture led to all kinds of chaos in ethics.
This isn’t limited to China. Their immorality spreads abroad
and hence Chinese gain bad reputations around the world.
Many local governments have made posts in public places,
writing, “Good Manners in Public” in Mandarin.
Zhang Jian: “Either in hotels or other places,
you see such warning messages written in Chinese.
Are these insults to us? They really aren’t. It’s true, Chinese
have done a lot that irritate others in foreign countries.
We need to think why things turn out like this.
The answer is that CCP has destroyed the Chinese culture.
It knows nothing about being temperate, kind, courteous,
restrained and magnanimous.
It has completely forgotten our tradition of morality.”
Chinese economist Lang Xianping once commented that,
China Red Cross appropriated donations, made enclosures
with zero payment and laundered money by blood donations;
all its leaders have to be dismissed for that.