【新唐人2013年02月07日訊】中共總理溫家寶日前主持國務院全體會議，再次提出要加大對收入分配的調節，這已經是溫家寶一年內八次提及收入分配改革問題。中共國務院5號發佈「關於深化收入分配制度改革的若干意見」，外界普遍認為，這是溫家寶交班前的改革成績單。而分析指出，所謂的收入分配，這個思路本身就是錯誤的。
「關於深化收入分配制度改革的若干意見」宣稱，要解決中國大陸當前貧富懸殊的社會危機，提高低收入民眾的收入水準，嚴控經濟壟斷和貪腐惡化等。
北京大學經濟學教授、美國「斯坦福大學胡佛研究院」訪問學者夏業良向《新唐人》表示，中共走的是馬克思主義的政治經濟學，強調的是收入分配。而收入分配的本身是一個完全錯誤的思路。
美國「斯坦福大學胡佛研究院」訪問學者夏業良：「他就等著有一個計劃主題，等著有一個至高無尚的人來給他們來分配，所以凡是搞馬克思主義政治經濟學的國家，最後都是失敗的。因為你誰來分配能分配的那麼公正，能為窮人著想，現在中國的情況還是一個不健全的市場經濟，創造了很多的價值之後，你看看政府的權力越大，就越不公平，收入懸殊差距就越大。」
夏業良還指出，現代經濟學，也就是西方經濟學，與馬克思主義政治經濟學根本性的區別是，現代經濟學強調的是「效率增進」，也就是怎麼樣把效率增加和提高。夏業良說，只有在一個能夠公開競爭的社會裏，才能讓老白姓發揮他們的聰明才幹。
夏業良：「政府應該做的是，先創造有利的競爭環境，等老百姓都競爭過以後，能發財的都發財了，發不了財的 人，能力特別差的人，政府給予一些補貼和幫助，這就是社會福利政策，一個好的社會就應該是這樣的，所以現在溫家寶講這個東西，除了搏起一點掌聲和一些眼淚以外，沒有甚麼實際的意義。」
中共喉舌《新華社》報導，收入分配改革已到攻堅時刻，亟待破解壟斷和腐敗兩大難題。2013年，伴隨中央接連傳出的深化改革信號，人們期待更多具體配套改革措施出臺。
據報導，大陸發改委、人社部、財政部等相關部門，在三月人大、政協兩會後，將陸續推出改革的配套措施。
但時事評論員林子旭認為，不管中共當局政策說得多漂亮，掌控實權的中共官員他們貪婪的本性卻不會改變。
時事評論員林子旭：「而且現在看來，中共官員對百姓的盤剝似乎越來越瘋狂，在這樣情況下，出臺這種沒有任何可執行性的文件，是沒有太大的意義的。 文件這個題目說的很明確，是若干意見，說白了執行不執行，還是中共官員自己說了算，老百姓完全沒有任何發言的權利。」
溫家寶在會中再次表示要「加大對收入分配的調節，促進社會公平正義」。這是溫家寶在一年內，八次提及收入分配改革問題。離中共中央「兩會」只有一個多月時間，溫家寶即將結束總理一職，因此，外界普遍認為，這是溫家寶交班前的改革成績單。但是，夏業良並不看好這個所謂的成績單。
夏業良：「溫家寶在任期間，雖然也講了一些美麗的詞語，美麗的概念。但是，我們對他並沒有很高的評價，因為他並沒有實在的，用自己全部的能力，來 為中國人做實實在在的，更大的推進，尤其他的家族也是腐敗的，不可能逃避腐敗的這樣一個怪圈，所以他不是那種清正廉明的形象。」
夏業良說，溫家寶想在歷史上留名清史，未必可以如願。
採訪編輯/常春 後製/葛雷
Income Distribution Reform: Wen’s ‘Graduation Report’?
Recently, Premier Wen Jiabao chaired a plenary meeting
of the State Council.
Wen raised again a proposal to accelerate
the income distribution reform.
This is the eighth time that Wen raises the same issue
within 12 months.
On Jan. 5th, the State Council published,
“Guidelines on Deepening Income Distribution Reform."
Outsiders believe, this is Wen’s last assignment
before his retirement.
Analysts pointed out that the so-called
“income distribution"was a wrong idea.
The guidelines claimed that it must solve the social crisis
of the gap between poor and rich in Mainland China;
to let the low-income urban and rural residents earn more;
to strictly control the economic monopoly and corruption.
Xia Yeliang, Professor of Economics at Peking University,
and a visiting scholar at Hoover Institution of Stanford University, was interviewed by NTDTV.
Prof Xia said, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) took the path
of Marxist’ polit. economy, stressing the income distribution.
However, the income distribution concept
is a totally wrong idea.
Xia Yeliang: “The CCP always launches a planned theme,
waiting for a supreme help to distribute it.
Thus, countries engaging in Marxist’s political economy
have all finally failed.
Who can distribute the income evenly?
Who can think of poor people?
Currently China is in a situation
of unhealthy market economy.
After it has created a lot of value, you see the government’s
power becoming greater, then the inequality is growing, and the income gap is getting deeper."
Xia also said that modern economics
refer to western economics.
Comparing with Marxist’s political economics,
there is a fundamental difference.
Modern economics emphasizes “efficiency improvement."
In other words, how to increase efficiency.
Xia said that only in an equal society with equal competition,
can civilians fully exert their talent.
Xia Yeliang: “The government should first create
healthy competitive environment.
After everyone has a fair go,
some will have the opportunity to make a fortune.
For those with lesser ability,
the government should offer help.
This are social welfare policies
of a healthy society.
Now Wen Jiabao raised this issue, and apart from winning
some applauses and tears, it has no practical meaning.”
The CCP’s mouthpiece Xinhua News Agency reported,
the income distribution reform has reached a crucial point.
Two major problems must be tackled:
monopoly and corruption.
In 2013, the central government sends signals of accelerating
the reform, people are expecting more detailed action plans.
Sources said that the National Development and Reform
Commission, the Human Resources and Social Security Ministry, the Finance Ministry, and other relevant units,
will release their action plans after March when National
People’s Congress and Political Consultative Conference end.
Lin Zixu, Current Affairs Commentator pointed out,
regardless of how beautiful CCP describes its policy,
the greedy nature of corrupt officials,
who control the real power, won’t change.
Lin Zixu:"Now the CCP officials exploit more and more
the civilians.
Under such a circumstance, only issuing a document
without action is meaningless.
The document had a clear title,"Guidelines,"
which means it can be implemented or not, either is ok.
In the end, the CCP officials make their own decision.
Civilians have no say."
Wen mentioned again to push forward the adjustment
of income distribution, to promote social fairness and justice.
This is the eighth time that Wen raises
the income distribution issue within the last 12 months.
Just over a month away from CCP’s two annual meetings,
Wen will step down soon.
Outsiders believe, this is Wen’s final assignment
before his retirement.
However, Xia isn’t optimistic about his so-called
‘graduation report.’
Xia:"During Wen’s terms, he said some beautiful words.
However, they didn’t have much weight.
As Wen didn’t practically use his power
for the progress of the Chinese people.
Especially his family was also corrupt; he can’t get away
from the corruption. Thus his image wasn’t honest and clean."
Xia said, Wen wanted to leave his name clean for the history,
but this might be hard to achieve.