【新唐人2012年12月31日訊】大陸中宣部下發通知，要求各下屬機關和媒體對新聞報導進行改進，提倡「短、實、新」，反對「假、長、空」。但這一規定並不被外界看好。評論指出，中共一黨獨裁之下，宣傳部門和媒體只是黨的喉舌、工具，在民眾沒有言論自由的情況下，類似的規定只是為了延續中共統治，迷惑公眾，不可能解決根本問題。
12月26號，中共中宣部發出通知，要求黨報、黨刊、通訊社、電臺、電視臺要從新聞報導、內容、語言、標題、篇幅到版面編排、欄目設計、節目製作等方面，進行全面改進，提倡「短、實、新」，反對「假、長、空」。
對此，深圳獨立作家朱建國向《新唐人》表示，實際上中共早自延安時代以來，就一直存在著文章「假、長、空」的問題，中共也曾經多次試圖進行改變。
深圳獨立作家朱建國：「但實際上，每次都改變不了。可能重新提的時候，會有一點點的變化，但是它不可能真正的長久，也不可能真正的消除。因為這個假、長、空是一黨專制的必然黨文化。」
朱建國還指出，要想杜絕「假、長、空」，就必須有真正的社會民主監督。
朱建國：「但現在8個民主黨都只是花瓶或僕人，所以在這種狀態下，甚麼改進作風，這些東西都是些老調，都解決不了根本問題，都只能是一時性的作秀而已。」
12月4號，新上臺的中共總書記習近平召集政治局會議，制定了八項新規，其中包括要改進新聞報導。12月11號，新任中宣部部長劉奇葆對習近平進行呼應，在公開講話中要求媒體改變文風。隨後，中宣部正式出臺《通知》，要求下屬機構制定具體方案，中央媒體發揮示範帶動作用。
時事評論員邢天行：「中宣部把大家對宣傳上的意見，導向所謂的文風。也就是說：作者本身導致這種假大空現象。顯然它是在轉移方向，也是在迷惑公眾。」
時事評論員邢天行認為，中宣部這個通知並不是改變文風這麼簡單，它的背後有一個大背景。那就是，中共在巨大執政危機之下，試圖通過做一些技巧性的改變，來維持中共統治。但中共設立獨有的「中宣部」對所有媒體進行嚴格監管，媒體淪為「黨的喉舌」，改變文風必然是一句空話。
邢天行：「它（中宣部）的設立本身就是要監管。那它要監管它就要過濾。它要過濾的話，它的那些下屬在寫文章的時候，為了保存自己、迎合上級，或者是替中共去做發聲筒的話，他可能去講真實的東西嗎？」
台灣《旺報》援引自由作家、大學教授胡勇的文章指出，就在劉奇葆講話後的第二天，大陸官媒《新華社》發出一篇近2000字的評論文章《敢啃硬骨頭，敢於涉險灘──習近平重要講話引起強烈反響》。胡勇質疑，《新華社》的這篇文章共提到10名代表，其中官員4名、官方智囊4名、企業家1名，而普通群眾只有1人。幹部群眾比例嚴重失調，文章有作假嫌疑。此外，當今中國人普遍對所謂的領導人講話不關心，文章卻號稱民眾「反應強烈」，這是官媒自說自話，根本不符合常情。
採訪/陳漢 編輯/李謙 後製/王明宇
Communist Propaganda Style Hard to Change
The Communist Central Propaganda Department
recently required improvement of news reporting.
Instead of being “fake, long and empty,” it asked
for the news to be “short, concrete and real.”
This regulation wasn’t previously being regarded.
It is said that under the one-party dictatorship, the propaganda
facilities only serve to be the party’s mouthpiece and tools.
There is no freedom of speech.
Any such regulation is only to continue the Communist
ruling by deceiving the public and will not solve any problem.
On December 26, the Chinese Communist Party Central
Propaganda Department issued a regulation.
It advocated an overall improvement of news reports
to all relevant media.
From the content to the layout, all programs need to be short,
concrete and real, instead of being long, empty and fake.
Shenzhen independent writer Zhu Jianguo told
New Tang Dynasty TV that
false long empty reporting has been an issue since
the Yan’an era, even though change has been advocated by Communist reports.
Shenzhen independent writer Zhu Jianguo:
“In fact, it cannot change.
Every time it was mentioned, it changed a little.
It never lasts and will never really change.
This false long empty style is a party culture under
the dictatorship."
Zhu Jianguo indicates that only a genuine social democratic
supervision will end the “fake, long, and empty” style.
Zhu Jianguo: “The existing eight Democratic Parties
are just to decorate the Communist Party.
The so-called improvement is only a replay of an old show.
It will not solve any problem."
On December 4, the Communist new General Secretary Xi
Jinping issued eight new rules in a recent Politburo meeting.
December 11, the new Propaganda Minister Liu Qibao
echoed Xi Jinping’s request by asking the media to change the reporting style in a public address.
Subsequently, the Central Propaganda Department official
notified subordinate media agencies to develop programs accordingly.
Political commentator Xing Tianxin: “The Propaganda
Department directs the issues towards the writing style.
In other words, it is the writers who created those
fake long empty reports.
Obviously it is to divert the focus and to deceive the public."
The political commentator Xing Tianxin believes that
the Central Propaganda Department’s notice is not really about changing the reporting style.
It is a tactic to maintain the Party’s ruling under the
current political crisis of the regime.
The Central Propaganda Department strictly supervises all
media to ensure they only serve to be the regime’s mouthpiece.
Changing the reporting style is an empty promise.
Xing Tianxin: “It (the Central Propaganda Department)
was set up to supervise.
It supervises through screening. To ensure survival,
no subordinate will dare to speak the truth."
Taiwan’s Want Daily reported an article by freelance writer
professor Hu Yong who indicated that
the day after Liu Qibao’s address, the Communist regime’s
mouthpiece, Xinhua News Agency, published a commentary.
This commentary indicated that Xi Jinping’s speech
has caused a popular response.
Hu Yong indicated that Xinhua’s report mentioned 10 people.
They are four officials, four people from the think tank
of the government, one entrepreneur, and one citizen.
With such a serious disproportion of officials versus people,
the genuineness of the article is questioned.
Meanwhile, the majority of Chinese nowadays care nothing
about officials’ speeches, but the article claimed it received a “popular response” from the public.
It is believed to be a self-made claim by the officials
and does not make sense.