【新唐人2012年6月4日訊】中共十八大前的權鬥加劇，掌管中宣部的血債派對網絡的封殺再度升級，最近有關六四的敏感詞也無法搜索，更為可笑的是，中共九常委的名字及「中共」、「共產黨」本身也被列為網絡禁詞，評論指出，中共內部博弈已陷入死局，胡溫只有拋棄中共的種種罪業包袱，才可能有一線活路。請看報導。

中共對微博的敏感詞封殺越來越離譜。不僅「周永康」三字在新浪微博上被禁止，現在中共「九常委名字」、「中共」、「共產黨」本身也被封殺。當局封鎖網絡管控的結果，導致了中共、共產黨等字眼也變成敏感詞。

自由作家荊楚：「所以中共這個體制一脈相承下來，它只能實現對國人的欺騙，對國人的恐怖要挾，它才能維持得下去，它一旦進入現代社會的民主化，多元性，思想的開放性，它是一天都沒法存活。」

最近當選四川省中共十八大代表的中共政治局常委李長春，被認為是「封殺網絡」的背後推手，李長春在中共中央統管宣傳思想意識形態，是「血債派」代表人物之一。

為了控制輿論導向和扼殺反對聲音，中共已經建立了幾十萬網絡警察部隊，因言獲罪的網民多達數百人。重慶「薄王事件」以來，「微博評論」一度遭到關閉三天的整頓。中宣部還在新浪、騰訊等大媒體中建立黨支部，公安部門直接管轄微博用戶的個人資料。但中宣部同時公開表示，難以控制微博，要立新法來加強管制。

「六四天網」負責人黃琦：「現在是網絡時代，不再是官方一言堂的時代，不是六，七十年代的只有一個聲音，畢竟微博，推特還有facebook，以及各種網絡的出現，致使當局控制輿論已經成為歷史。」

「六四23週年」的到來，「8X8」也被封殺，現在網民將「5月34日」作為六四前夕的代名詞。

英國媒體《金融時報》日前報導說，溫家寶近年三次在中共高層秘密會議上提出為「八九民運」平反，最後一次是今年（2012年）3月。有猜測說，中共高層年內會有「平反六四」的大動作。

自由作家荊楚：「就看胡景濤，溫家寶，習近平他們能不能有破釜沉舟，『苟利國家生死以』的那種膽氣了，如果他們再像過去一樣維護共產黨的這艘破船，想在這艘破船上隨著共產黨一起沉沒的話，我認為他們是不明智的，可以說是愚蠢的，不在這方面有所動作的話，國內的政治，社會的安定，將給中華民族帶來空前的災難的。」

相反的，荊楚表示，胡溫如果順應民意，順時而變的話，拋棄中共劣跡斑斑、惡貫滿盈的包袱，就能給中華民族帶來一線希望的曙光。

採訪/唐睿 編輯/許旻 後製/鐘元

Word “CCP” Banned on Internet in Communist China?

Fighting has intensified ahead of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) 18th National Congress Committee. More words have been blocked by the Central Propaganda Department which is controlled by the blood-debt faction. Internet searches for June 4 incident are now impossible.

Now the “Nine CCP Standing Committee", and the words “Communist" and “CCP" are also banned. Comments suggest the CCP infighting battle has now been caught in a dead end. Only if Hu and Wen get rid of all the burdens of the sins of the CCP can they find a way out.

The CCP’s censorship of microblog keywords is growing more outrageous.

Prohibited words not only include “Zhou Yongkang”， but also the “Nine CCP Standing Committee”， “Communist” and “the CCP” itself have been blocked. The Chinese regime closing off the network has resulted in the words of the CCP, the Communist Party, also becoming sensitive words.

Freelance writer Jing Chu: “So the typical Communist system can only achieve the deception of the people. It can only achieve terror and blackmail of the people, this is how the CCP survives. Once the CCP needs to face the modern society, democratization, pluralism and ideological openness, the CCP could not live even one day.”

Li Changchun, from Sichuan Province, was recently elected as a Politburo Standing Committee member. Li Changchun is considered the driving force behind

the “ban network”, and one of the representatives of the blood-debt faction.

In order to control public opinion and the voice of opposition, the CCP has established hundreds of thousands of Internet police. Hundreds of free speech internet users had been charged. After the Chongqing’s Bo and Wang case, microblog comments were shut down for three days to rectify the issue. The Central Propaganda Department also established party branches in the Sina microblog, Tencent as well as other media. The personal information of microblog users is directly under the administration of the Public Security of the CCP. However, the Central Propaganda Department publicly stated that it is difficult to control microblogs in China. New laws are coming.

Huang Qi, Chief of Tiananmen Skynet:”Now is the internet era. Not the era of the official mouthpiece, like the 60’s and 70’s were there was only one tone in China. Now, there are microblogs, Tweeters, Facebook, and a variety of other networks. This has caused the authorities controlling public opinion to face more and more difficulty.”

As the arrival of the 23 anniversary of June 4, “8X8″ is also blocked. Internet users now use “May 34th” as synonymous with the eve of June 4th.

British “Financial Times" reported that Premier Wen Jiabao had mentioned for the vindication of the pro-democracy movement in 1989. This was happened three times in recent years, while in CCP leadership meetings, the last being in March 2012. There is speculation that the CCP leadership might be “vindicating June 4”.

Freelance writer Jing Chu: “Hu Jingtao, Wen Jiabao, and Xi Jinping; whether they have the kind of courage to “go with life and death” for the sake of their people, and abandon Communism. Otherwise, if they still like to maintain the Communist Party this sinking ship, and go with it; I think they are unwise. It’s stupid! If they don’t make the right moves for political and social stability, it will give the Chinese nation an unprecedented disaster."

Jing Chu considered if Hu and Wen respond to public opinion to create a smooth time for change. If they abandon the burden of the Chinese Communist misdeeds, with many evil debts, you can bring a glimmer of hope for the Chinese n