【新唐人2012年1月28日訊】今年央視春晚依然是惡評如潮。之前多位大牌明星退出春晚，直播當晚明星集體走調，這些依然是坊間街頭議論的話題。最近，又有網友披露，春晚涉及四大「盜版」節目，而無緣春晚的郭德綱，也因此曲線上了一把春晚。
2012年央視春晚剛結束，就有網友微博發帖爆料，由郭冬臨主演的小品《超市面試》，涉嫌抄襲日本搞笑組合UNJASH的小品《打工面試》，從設定、結構到包袱幾乎都一樣。
《超市面試》和《打工面試》同樣講的是一家超市店長，把前來應聘的人誤會為小偷的故事。兩個小品中應聘者都有五年的工作經驗，並且，應聘者都夢想著擁有一家自己的超市。
郭冬臨回應抄襲門則說：「這事應該問中央電視臺，問他們是怎麼回事。」
歌星韓庚也陷入「抄襲門」。他與「年」獸打鬥的表演，炫目的舞臺設計，配合韓庚大玩雙節棍，眼花繚亂的動作，確實搶眼。
不過，馬上有網友發現，韓庚的節目，與美國明星碧昂斯的新專輯歌曲《run the world》的表演，相似度達到90%。此外，還有網友貼出一段來自日本某綜藝節目的「光影舞」視頻，韓庚的表演也與此相似。
一直無緣參加春晚的郭德綱，這次卻意外「曲線」上了春晚。在馮鞏和牛莉表演的相聲劇《愛的代駕》中，有一段對白，馮鞏問「你有病啊」，牛莉作答「你有藥啊」，被發現源自郭德綱和于謙表演的相聲《你有病》。
「你有病啊？
你有藥啊？
你吃多少？
你有多少？
你有多少吃多少？
你吃多少有多少？」
對燒錢2個億的春晚，居然出現兩個嚴重抄襲造假的節目，網友感到憤怒，呼籲抵制「春晚二手貨，拒絕央視春晚！」
網友質問，如果，UNJASH要求央視支付小品《打工面試》巨額的版權費，央視將如何面對？如果打起官司又將有何顏面？
《南方都市報》署名朱永華的文章說，整臺春晚完全靠華麗的燈光來渲染，春晚越來越像是一座忽悠全國觀眾的形象工程。
春晚造假早有前科。「假唱」的傳聞一直不斷。連主持人唸出的一份份來自中國各地的所謂「賀電」，也被網友曝光是造假的。
大陸詩人、文化批評家葉匡政還發現，今年春晚的主持人連說話都不自信，是歷年表現最差的。
大陸詩人、文化批評家葉匡政：「他們連他們自己都不相信他們所講的一些話了，當一個主持人不相信自己所說的話了，他必然沒有激情，必然無法影響觀眾，必然你在下面看到，感到主持人講話非常虛假。」
來自《紅網》的文章認為，春晚多數劇本的創作，出自於一些所謂的「御用」之手，他們不僅把持了演員本人，甚至還壟斷了一些演出和節目製作。抄襲造假事件的頻頻發生，正是這些「御用」之手創作力枯竭後的無恥之舉。
新唐人記者李靜、王明宇綜合報導。
CCTV’s New Year Gala Involved in Four Plagiarisms
Predictably, the 2012 China Central Television’s (CCTV)
New Year Gala received bad reviews.
People are discussing the several big stars, who quit the gala,
and the off-key song in the show.
Recently, netizens revealed that CCTV’s gala was involved
in four plagiarisms.
Therefore Guo Degang who never had the chance to appear
in the gala got a chance “indirectly” this time.
Shortly after the 2012 CCTV New Year Gala, some netizens
revealed on a Microblog about possible plagiarism.
The sketch, ‘Interview in a Supermarket’, starring
Guo Donglin, ‘
might have plagiarized the sketch of a Japanese
comedy group UNJASH, called Interview for a Job.
It’s similarities spanned from design and structure
to punch lines.
Both “Interview in a Supermarket” and “Interview for a Job”
describe a supermarket manager.
In these sketches, the manager mistook an interviewee for
a thief.
In both sketches, the interviewees had five year’s work
experience and dreamed of opening up a supermarket.
Guo Donglin replied to the suspicion: You should ask CCTV
about what’s going on.
A singer, Han Geng, was also involved in a plagiarism
scandal.
His performance fighting with the Nien beast, with nunchaku
skills, and dazzling stage design, was eye-catching.
Netizens discovered Han Geng’s performance was 90% like
American singer Beyonce’s new song “Run the World.”
Some netizens shared a video of “Light and Shadow Dance”
from a Japanese variety show.
This video was also similar to which Han Geng’s
performance.
Guo Degang, a crosstalk performer was never allowed
to appear in CCTV’s New Year Gala.
However, Guo got a chance “indirectly” this time.
The comedy dialogue performed by Feng Gong and Niu Li,
“Drive for Love”, contained plagiarism.
In the dialogue, Feng asked, “are you sick,” and Niu replied,
“do you have medicine?”
This dialogue was found to originate from a cross-talk
by Guo and Yu Qian.
“Are you sick? Do you have medicine? How much do you need?
As much as you have? As much as you need?”
Many netizens felt angry with CCTV’s New Year gala,
costing 200 million RMB.
It contained two pieces which were involved in severe
plagiarism.
They called for a boycott of “CCTV gala’s second-hand
performance!”
Some netizens highlighted whether UNJASH required CCTV
to pay the large copyright royalties for its sketch.
What will CCTV do? How embarrassing it would be to go
to court?
An Southern Metropolis Daily article by Zhu Yonghua, said
that the whole CCTV’s gala relied on the lighting.
It is more likely to be an imagery project which bluffs people.
CCTV’s gala has been involved in fraud before. There are
always rumors that singers are only mouthing the words.
Even the congratulatory letter read by the emcees were
revealed by netizens to be faked.
Ye Kuangzheng, Chinese poet and literary critic, discovered
that the emcees in this year’s gala had no confidence.
They had the worst performance ever.
Ye Kuangzheng: “They didn’t even believe in their own
words.
They can no longer have the passion to influence the audience
in this way.
If you watch them, you will feel the insincerity from
their words.”
An article from “RedNet” said that most scripts for CCTV’s
gala were composed by several “hack writers.”
They do not only control performers, but also monopolize
the production of some programs.
The repeating plagiarism and frauds are due to these
hack writers having lost all creativity.
NTD reports Li Jing and Wang Mingyu