【新唐人2011年11月12日訊】《大方》雜誌在發行兩期之後，正式宣佈「被停刊」，對此，韓寒在他的個人部落格發表文章，紀念自己出刊一期被停的《獨唱團》以及出版兩期被停的《大方》，他再次批評中共的文化審核制度，不過，這篇文章在網路發表沒多久，就被當局給和諧了。
《大方》的官方微博上發佈了一則「敬告」啟事：「11月1日接通知，《大方》不得再出版。」
有人認為停刊的原因，可能是由於《大方》「以書代刊」 而遭到制裁。《大方》編委之一止庵表示，不排除這種可能性，他說，《大方》定位為多元文集，從沒說過這是一本雜誌，如何界定「以書代刊」和「多元文集」的區別，相關單位並沒有明文規定。
網友「半夏蘇葉」感嘆的說，我不明白憑甚麼越是有價值的雜誌如《大方》如《獨唱團》都不能好好的出下去呢。難道稍有文學意義的就只有被停刊的命運?
網友「臺東鎮」說，所有的自由思想與表達管道都堵塞掉。還有網友說，「社會主義文化大發展大繁榮，意味著對文化更加嚴酷的管制。」
有一段時間沒有在部落格發文的韓寒，發表文章說，在中國只有擁有書號才能出版，只有出版社才能發書號，只有官方纔能有出版社，所以從源頭上，自由的出版其實是不可能的。
韓寒說，自己從第一本書《三重門》到被停刊的《獨唱團》，到現在，每次在網路發表文章，隔日就不見，真的很掃興。
《大方》編委之一的葉美瑤說：台灣出版人會覺得不可思議，當局面對這份初刊就號稱發行百萬的刊物，不談內容不談思想，祭出不得以書代刊的法令，北京出版人瞭然得連生氣都沒有！也因此我格外欣賞韓寒，他至少在這樣的體制下還能生氣。
韓寒的文章被刪除後，還是不影響網友在上面留言，不明白的網友問：為甚麼看不到文字啊？另一名網友馬上說：被刪除了。許多網友生氣的回應，有沒有搞錯，又被河蟹掉了。
這篇被刪除的文章吸引了將近64萬人次，成功轉載四千多次，網友「普蘭可」還做了」抗和諧備份」， 他不認識韓寒，無法請求轉載許可，但他希望文章不要「被消失」，讓網友在網路上找的到這篇文章，讓真相不要被掩蓋。
今年初曾被媒體廣泛報導的「雜誌書創辦熱潮」，已經開始出現了隱患。這些青春雜誌要想獲得刊號，除了言論需符合當局的格調之外，不排除和出版集團的後臺「能力」有關。
台灣《新經典文化》總編輯葉美瑤在臉書上寫著：我很難愛中國這個出版時代。資深出版人傅月庵說：這是一個逼人拉關係、走後門，按潛規則辦事的國家。
韓寒也說，我不知道一個文化人提筆就哆嗦的國家怎麼能建設成文化強國，一個因為要避諱常委所以在谷歌上搜索不到李白的國家，怎麼能建設成文化強國。
新唐人記者黃容綜合報導。
“Generous” magazine was forced to stop publication
“Generous” magazine made a formal announcement of
“forced stopping of publication”, after publishing two issues.
To commemorate his “Solo Group”, which was ordered to
stop after publishing one issue, and “Generous” magazine,
renowned writer Han Han posted a blog article criticizing
the censorship system of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
However, the article was soon “harmonized“ by the CCP.
Generous magazine posted a notice on its official website,
advising,
“An instruction on November 1 ordered Generous
to stop publication."
Some people think that Generous』 publication being stopped
may have been because it issued journal with a book number (ISBN) thereby incurring sanction.
Member of the Editorial Board, Zhi』an, said that
this possibility had not been ruled out.
But Generous was defined as an edition of diversified anthology,
and never alleged to be a magazine.
How are “issuing publication with book number" and
“edition of diversified anthology" defined?
the official department concerned has never expressly
specified the difference between two.
Netizen Banxia Suye sighed, I just do not know
why the more valuable magazines such as Generous, and Solo Group, cannot be allowed to publish?
Don’t tell me the magazines with a little literary significance
can only have a suspended fate.
Netizen Taidong Town said in a posting,
that all the channels of free thinking and expression are blocked.
Another netizen commented, “the great development and
prosperity of socialist culture" means that culture is controlled more severely.
Han Han, a renowned writer, said in his blog post,
In China, a publication can be made only with a book number,
but only the publishing house are eligible to issue the book number,
while the authorities are the only owner of the publishing house.
So, from the source, free publication is in fact not possible.
Han Han said that from his first book, Triple Gate, to
the suspended magazine Solo Group,
and even up until to now, every article published online
would disappear the next day. It was really disappointing.
Yemei Yao, a member of Editorial Board of Generous, said
Taiwan publishers would feel it incredible that
the authorities had officially ordered suspension of
such a publication with millions of the first issue sold,
regardless of it’s content and thinking,
but the Beijing publisher, to my surprise, did not get angry!
That』s why I particularly appreciate Han Han,
under such a political system, he can at least get angry.
After Han Han’s article was deleted, netizens left messages.
A confused netizen asked why couldn』t I see the text?
Another netizen replied right away that It had been deleted.
Many netizens responded angrily:
The article was again river-crabbed. (Homophone of harmonized)
Han』s deleted article has attracted nearly 64 million hits,
and has been successfully reproduced over 4,000 times.
Netizen Pulanke even made an “anti-harmony backup".
As he does not know Han Han, he cannot apply for reproduction permission.
So he hopes the article will not suffer a “forced disappearance”,
letting netizens find the article online, and allowing the truth to not be concealed.
Earlier, in 2011, a tidal wave of magazine and book
founders, with extensive media coverage, emerged potential problems.
To get a serial number (ISSN), these youth magazines have
to remain consistent with the authorities』 tone.
It does not rule out the links to “the capability” of
behind-the-scene supporters of the publishing group.
Taiwan’s New Classical Culture chief editor, Yemei Yao,
posted in the face book, I feel it is difficult to love the era of publishing in today』s China.
Fu Yue』an, a veteran publisher said,
“This is a country that compels people to
establish underhanded connection,
to pull strings, to handle matters following hidden rules.
Han Han wrote online, I do not know how such a country,
in which a civilized person shakes with fear when writing articles, can be built into a cultural power?
A country that makes a taboo of the phrase “standing committee”,
can block online searches for Li Bai. (China』s most renowned poet)
How can it become a cultural power?
NTD reporter Huang Rong