【新唐人2011年10月21日訊】中共十七屆六中全會降下帷幕，這次會議重點，中共提出，建設所謂的社會主義文化強國等。中共當局解讀，這是強化自我意識，認識文化在國際競爭中的重要性。而海外學者認為，這裡面還隱藏著中共企圖通過所謂的文化改革，向西方輸出社會主義價值觀，以成為世界領袖的野心。不過，中共的野心可以實現嗎？請聽學者的分析。

為期4天的中共十七屆六中全會18號結束。各界對中共在這次會議提出的“文化體制改革”尤其關注。全會審議通過了《中共中央關於深化文化體制改革、推動社會主義文化大發展大繁榮若干重大問題的決定》。

北京大學文化產業研究院副院長陳少峰聲稱，建設社會主義文化強國的相關表述是公報最大亮點。他認為，三十多年來，中國的文化發展現狀與經濟社會發展、中國國際影響力卻不相稱，全會做出的部署，意味著中國將以經濟強國推動成為文化強國的思路。

海外學者認為，這裡包含了中共秘而不宣的，以文化輸出，來稱霸世界的野心。

美國國際出版社社長劉因全認為，中共知道，單純靠經濟、軍事，它是很難在世界上稱霸的，所以他們就想在文化方面下手，來達到在這個世界上稱霸的目地。

美國國際出版社社長劉因全：“我認為它這個目地是很難達到的。因為我也看了中共搞的那種所謂的文化建設，還是侷限在原來的，所謂的堅持馬列主義、毛澤東思想啊、鄧小平理論、三個代表、科學發展觀，還是這些東西。在這個圈子裡，不會有甚麼實質性的突破。”

劉因全認為，中共很難突破“無神論”的框架，而在唯物主義的思想架構下的文化，很難有所建樹和發展，更不會被世界主流文化、以及世界各族人民所接納。

那麼，中共所主張的是甚麼文化呢？美國南加州大學公共政策博士葉科指出，中共推崇的是所謂黨文化。

美國南加州大學公共政策博士葉科：“黨文化基本上就是通過，張揚一些樣板戲，所謂的主旋律，這些主旋律基本上，可以說，跟社會公認的、這個世界公認的普世價值是違背的。其實它跟主流是格格不入的，在這種情況下，你這樣的文化、獨裁的文化、顛倒的文化，這樣一個虛偽扭曲的文化，你怎麼跟世界去接軌啊？”

目前居住美國，曾經在大陸籃球賽場上叱奼風雲的前國籃手陳凱向記者講述，雖然旁人很羨慕他所取得的地位，但在中共的專制統治下、黨文化下，自己的內心已經死亡。

前國籃手陳凱：“因為共產黨非常懂得，只要把人的靈魂抽掉以後，他們的地位就可以坐穩。很簡單，如果所有都變成活死人了，跟他們一樣，都變成沒有任何的價值觀、沒有任何的正義感、沒有任何的尊嚴這樣一種人，那共產黨的地位肯定做穩了。如果共產黨能夠把全世界都變成這種的話，那共產黨可能在世界上稱霸了。”

對一些西方公司資助中共所謂的“七一”獻禮片《建黨偉業》，以及與中共做生意，陳凱指出，跟專制的社會做生意，要提防它會把你吃掉。

最近，美國大使駱家輝的平民形象，在大陸官方和民間引發不同的討論。駱家輝帶來的美國價值觀被中共媒體批評為“新殖民主義”，大陸民間卻為他鼓掌歡迎。

葉科指出，在西方文明社會，政府官員就是為老百姓服務的，這是現代社會的主流文明價值觀，但在中國卻被完全顛倒了。

美國南加州大學公共政策博士葉科：“它現在說的這個文化啊，對外宣傳啊，其實是為了掩蓋自己，現在在文化方面這樣一個落後和虛弱，所以它必須要提出一個口號，說白了就是一個話語權，因為這個大帽子可以給你來點表面上的競爭，可是真正的文化，它不僅僅是表面的東西，它是有它的內涵的。你只要到國際社會，你怎麼去處理這個事情，面對其他國家殺戮的時候，面對老百姓遭到強權迫害的時候，你這個政府站在哪一邊。”

今年3月，中共對聯合國授權向利比亞發動襲擊投出棄權票。 10月4號，聯合國安理會譴責敘利亞政府武力鎮壓民眾的議案，又遭到中共的否決。中共連番舉動引起歐美領導人憤怒和失望。

新唐人記者周玉林、李靜、蕭宇採訪報導。

China’s has just concluded its 6th Plenary Session of

the 17th Central Committee.

At the congress, the CCP revealed it will be building up

its so-called socialist cultural power.

It claims that to gain international recognition,

the regime needs to strengthen its cultural influence.

Some scholars say that the CCP wants to spread

its communist values to the West and in so doing conquer

the world.

Will the CCP succeed in its ambition?

The four-day Plenary Session ended on October 18th.

Members of the public are concerned over its reform.

The congress passed a new resolution to: “Deepen the

Reform of the Cultural System, Promote Socialist Cultural

Development and other Important Issues."

Chen Shaofeng, Beijing’s University Vice Director, claims

that the new resolution was the highlight of the congress.

But Shaofeng says that the current development of

the Chinese Culture neither matches with the economic and social development,

nor does it match with China’s international influence.

Chen went on to say that the new resolution means

that the CCP is trying to promote the idea that

China’s economic power goes hand in hand with

cultural power and it is trying now to be seen as a global leader.

Overseas scholars comment that the resolution highlights

the CCP’s cultural manipulation and its ambition to govern the world.

Liu Yinquan believes the CCP understands now that

to simply rely on economic power

and military rule is not enough to conquer the world,

and it is now relying on cultural dominance.

[Liu Yinquan, Director, U.S. International Publisher]:

“I believe the CCP’s aim will be difficult to achieve.

As I know, the CCP’s culture is based on Marxism-Leninism,

Mao Zedong’s ideology, De Xiaoping’s theory,

Jiang』s Three Represents, and the concept of science’s

development. There will be no practical breakthrough.”

Liu also stated that the CCP would find it hard to break away

from its atheist framework and its materialistic culture.

And without improving on both, it will not become the world’s

mainstream culture nor be accepted by a global audience.

So what kind of culture is the CCP promoting?

Dr. Ye Ke, of the University of Southern California

Public Policy Division, points out that the CCP is promoting its own communist party culture.

[Dr. Ye Ke, Uni. of Southern Cali. Public Policy Division]:

“The party culture is based on intrigue and revolutionary model operas.

Their main themes are against universal values that

are accepted worldwide.

In fact CCP’s culture is incompatible with

the mainstream.

Such a dictatorial culture, such a hypocritical deformed

culture, how can it match with global standards?"

Former Chinese national basketball player Chen Kai is

now living in the U.S. He tell us of his past experience.

While many envied his position and status in China,

he says his heart was dead under the CCP’s rule.

[Chen Kai, Former National Basketball Player]:

“The CCP understands very well that by depriving people of

their souls,

their (CCP’s) own positions become more stable.

It’s simple, if everyone lives like an undead, like the CCP,

if everyone lives without values, sense of justice or dignity,

then the CCP can sit securely on its position.

If the CCP turns the entire world like this,

the CCP can then dominate the world."

When trying to do business with China, some western

companies have sponsored the CCP’s propaganda film

“The founding of a Party." Chen Kai pointed out that

when doing business with a dictatorship, one might end up being eaten by it.

Recently, the public image of the American Ambassador

Gary Locke was debated by both Chinese officials and the general public.

Even though Locke’s American values

are seen by the Chinese regime’s media as a form of

“new colonialism", Locke was very welcomed by the

general public.

Dr. Ye Ke also pointed out that in western society,

Government officials are there to serve the general public,

but it is turned upside down in China.

[Dr. Ye Ke, Uni. of Southern Cali. Public Policy Division]:

“The culture the CCP talks about and its external propaganda, are all there to cover up itself.

Right now the CCP is very outdated and weak cultural wise.

So it must throw out a slogan, or a superficial claim to grab the right to speak.

However, real culture is not superficial, it has inner values.

When meeting with international circles, how do you treat such an issue?

When facing opposition from other countries and

when common citizens are being persecuted by a dictatorship, which side are you on?"

Last March, the Chinese Regime did not vote in regards to

the UN resolution on Lybia.

Then again this month, on Oct. 3rd, the CCP opposed the UN Security Council’s resolution to

condemn the Syrian government for using the military against

its civilian protesters. This actions have left Western leaders

furious and disappointed with the Chinese Regime.

NTD reporters Zhou Yulin, Li Jing and Xiao Yu