【新唐人2011年9月1日訊】中共當局對「7•23」溫州動車追尾事故調查結果即將公布前，發生了一件「微妙」的事情。署名為「杭州電務段溫州車間全體職工」 的一封公開信，在內地各大論壇被轉載，信中反駁國家安監總局總工程師、新聞發言人黃毅關於「7.23」溫州動車追尾事故原因的講話。

8月30號的《東方網》報導說，溫州南站電務車間全體員工8月26號晚對外發佈了一封公開信，反駁國家安監總局總工程師、新聞發言人黃毅關於溫州動車追尾事故原因的講話，認為他的講話「與事實不符、混淆職責、有失公正」。信中還提到，「7.23」事故當天值班的兩位職工到目前為止仍然被扣留。

8月23號，黃毅在接受《中國新聞週刊》採訪時說，從發生故障到列車追尾，責任部門沒有採取防範措施，違規操作；黃毅還提到：溫州南站電務值班人員沒有按有關規定及時匯報，沒有進行故障處理，沒能有效防止事故的發生。

公開信中逐條進行了反駁。例如：

「1、『未進行故障處理』與事實不符。當時電務值班人員正根據車務登記的2個軌道電路區段故障進行故障處理。」

「2、匯報主要是車站值班員的職責，而電務值班人員應當在接收車站的故障通知後，按照故障處理流程儘快修復設備。事實上當天車站值班員已經發現了CTC設備故障，並向行車調度作了匯報，只是沒有在運統-46上登記並通知電務值班人員。因此，電務值班人員不存在「 未按規定進行及時匯報」問題。

「3、當天的情況是車站和調度所的監控屏幕上都出現了D3115次丟車的顯示，但CTC設備系統沒有「丟車報警功能」，車站值班員已經發現了「丟車」情況，並向行車調度作了匯報。」

公開信除了反駁黃毅的講話，還透露以前鮮為人知的「D3115次丟車」，「該系統沒有丟車報警功能」 等信息。顯示當時D3115次丟車雖然已經被調度確認，但由於系統功能缺乏，無從處理。不過，調度員在收到「丟車報告」後為甚麼沒有發出預警，以及是否還有別的隱情等，則將引發新的問責。

「丟車」這一信息在各大論壇上引起網友的熱烈議論，許多網友表示震驚。有網友指責這體現了「鐵道部的管理弱智，一定不能承認，找替罪羊是慣用的手法。」也有人諷刺說：「 安監局的報告已經避重就輕，幫領導開脫了，可惜下面的人不願意幫領導背責任，沒有全局觀。」 更有人嘆息，「沒有公正，沒有真相，從上而下，徹底潰爛。」

公開信在網絡引發討論後，《每日經濟新聞》31號的報導說，杭州電務段溫州車間有關負責人30號表示，雖然這一公開信的署名為「 杭州電務段溫州車間全體職工」，但寫公開信的可能是溫州車間個別職工，或其他車間，不清楚是甚麼人所寫。但他沒有否認「 7•23」事故當天值班的兩名職工到目前為止仍然被扣留。

公開信中也提到，「我們深感不安，甚至是恐懼。大家都害怕值班，害怕處理故障，大家都對鐵路信號工作失去了信心，深怕一不小心就會被追究法律責任。這是我們的悲哀，也是所有電務職工的悲哀，也是「 公道」的悲哀，更是社會法制的悲哀…。」

新唐人記者尚燕、柏妮綜合報導。

Wenzhou South Train Station Electricity Department』s Open Letter

Prior to the 『July 23 high-speed rail crash』s result releasing,

a 『delicate』 issue took place.

An open letter claimed to be written by 「All members of staff

in Wenzhou Railway Electricity Department」

has been widely spread online by netizens.

It disputed the news spokesman and the state administration』s

bureau engineer Huang Yi about his remarks

explaining the main cause of the rail incident.

The eastday.com said on August 30, that all staff members of

the electricity department in Wenzhou South Station jointly

wrote an open letter, which was made public on August 26

to disprove news spokesman Huang Yi』s speech.

It stated, 「the staff members disagree with the content,

which is biased and obscure.」 In the letter it is also stated that

two staff on duty on the day of accident are still detained.

Huang told China News on Aug. 23, responsible departments

didn』t take precautionary measures before the crash.

He also blamed the staff of the Electricity Department in

Wenzhou South Station for their delayed report,

no recovery process and ineffective prevention measures.

The letter refuted Yi』s speech point by point:

1. The 「 no recovery processing」 is a lie.

The electricity department staff members on duty at that

time were troubleshooting the two track circuits.

2. Reporting is the duty of the shift staff of the station.

The electricity workshop staff members are responsible for

repairing the equipment after receiving a fault notice

from the station.

The fact is, the shift duty staff had already found fault in the

CTC equipment and reported this to the dispatching department.

They did not inform the electricity department staff on the

YT-46 registration system.

Hence, the electricity department staff members were

not responsible for the delayed report.

3. On the day of crash, the monitoring screens at the station

and the dispatching department showed signs that

the D3115 train was missing, however, the CTC equipment

lacks an alarming function for missing trains.

Nevertheless, the shift station staff reported the train missing

situation to the dispatching department.

The open letter is not only refuting Huang』s speech,

but provides more information.

This includes the unknown fact of the D3115 train missing

and the lack of an alarming function for missing trains.

It shows that despite the train missing message was confirmed,

it was not dealt with, due to the system』s lack of functionality.

As to the reason why the dispatchers did not make any early

warnings upon receiving the report,

or if something had been hidden, remain questionable.

The report of the missing train spurred massive disputes online,

with some citizens making condemning remarks:

「They will never confess the managerial stupidity in the

Ministry of Railways, but they will try to find someone to take

the blame for them.」

Another satirized, 「the safety supervision bureau report has

already helped the authorities to defuse the intense critique,

shamefully their subordinates didn』t want to become scapegoats,」

Another said hopeless, 「no justice, no truth on any management

level, thoroughly corrupt.」

The NBD News said on August 31 that the person in charge of

the Wenzhou electricity department stated, on August 30,

even though the open letter bears the signature of all staff

members, it may have been written by just a few people,

or by staff from other departments. The fact that two staff

members on duty remain in detention is not denied.

Also contained in the letter, 「we are worried and terrified.

People here are afraid to go on shift, or fault processing.

Confidence has been lost in railway signal duties,

for fears of being charged with liability for

making even a slight mistake. It is the sadness for all our

electricity department members, for social morals,

and for social judicial judgment.」

NTD reporters Shang Yan and Bo Ni