【新唐人2013年11月28日讯】星期二，美军两架重型轰炸机在没有知会北京的情况下，飞越了中共刚刚划定的“东海防空识别区”。针对美国这个明确的示警动作，中共国防部新闻发言人27号表示，共军对美机进行全程监视、即时识别，判别美方飞机类别，除此之外，中方并无其他反应。
26号，据美国官员透露，周一晚间，美军两架没有武装，也没有随行护航飞机的B-52轰炸机，从日本关岛安德森空军基地出发，在美东时间晚间7点，进入中共自己宣布的“东海防空识别区”。据说，这次行动是美军军事演习的一部分，而飞行事先并没有通知中共。
北京时政观察人士华颇表示，美国2架B-52轰炸机到中共自划识别区转一圈，有警告的意味。
北京时政观察人士华颇：“美国的信号很明显的，那就是警告中国（中共），不要采取一些过激的行为、避免擦枪走火。”
11月23号，中共突然单方面宣布在东海设立大片防空识别区，并要求进入这个区域的航空器必须提供识别，否则中国可采取“军事防御性紧急处置”。而这一空域包括日本实际控制的钓鱼岛，和南韩实际控制的独岛，以及靠近台湾海峡、和冲绳岛有关的空域。
美国国务院发言人帕萨其周二表示，美国在日本和南韩的驻军已多达七万人。他还强调，中共不应该设立“东海防空识别区”，他誓言，美国不会遵守中共的防空识别区规定。
美国“纽约城市大学”政治学教授夏明表示，作为美国，如果遵从中共的识别区，实际上就是把它自己控制的战略空间拱手相让。
美国“纽约城市大学”政治学教授夏明：“这块地区是有争议的，那有争议的地区还没有解决，但中共单方提出它的这个防空预警区，想单方来解决。防空识别区从某种程度来说，其实就是对韩国跟日本的一个直接挑战。而韩国跟日本的盟友是美国，显然对美国也是一个直接挑战。所以（美国）派2架B-52轰炸机去，显示出美国我既不遵守，而且我也不会失誓的决心。”
针对美国的举动，到目前为止，中共还没有对此提出抗议。
华颇：“中共官方不会大肆炒作这个问题。东海钓鱼岛是它的核心利益，但是它并不想为此，真正的和日本、美国打一场战争，所以它对美国2架B-52到来采取一种低调的应对。”
夏明：“现在可以看见美国现在冲到它（中共）的底线了，第一，它是不是会向美国政府提出抗议﹔第二，它多大程度上抗议，是不是敢发出警告信，我们就要驱赶，或者是我们要防卫，它有没有这个决心。”
据媒体报导，美国的航母战斗群与日本的舰队，于27号抵达东海海域进行演习。
而在26号，中共第一艘航母“辽宁舰”带领它的战斗群，从北海再往东海驶向南海，进行某种军事上的演练。
18号，中国海军三大舰队起程往西太平洋海域，举行代号“机动五号”远洋实兵对抗演习。
13号，美、韩、日在靠近中国的黄海举行联合军演的同时，中国海军北海和东海舰队，也罕见的出动上百艘军舰及30多架战机，在黄海海域展开大规模演习。
美、中双方都在做频繁的军演，用意何在？
“澳门国际军事学会”会长黄东对香港媒体表示，中共的军演肯定也针对美军，他说﹕“如此大型的演习必定会有一个假想敌，美航母毫无疑问就是被针对的主角。”
夏明认为，中共近年来自视实力增强，国力上升，想扩张的权欲膨胀，尤其在太平洋西岸扩展它的生存空间和势力范围。日、美海上合作演习就是让中共意识到，美、日有更大的作战群在它航母旁边监视着。
夏明：“美国也是不愿意让中国（中共）既在空中进行扩张，又在海上耀武杨威，这是美、日针对中共的一种心理战、心理较量、展示实力的一种心理较量。”
夏明表示，美国目前所做的一切，就是在向他的盟国，尤其亚洲的盟国展示他的决心，表现他是不惜一战来保护他的盟国利益，也保护美国在西太平洋的利益。
采访编辑/易如 后制/钟元
U.S. Aircraft Fly in China’s Claimed Airspace Without Asking
On Tuesday, two U.S. B-52 bombers flew through China’s
newly designated air defense identification zone over
the East China Sea without notifying Beijing.
In light of the clear warning from the U.S., Chinese Defense
Ministry spokesman said on the 27th that the military monitored
the U.S. planes and instantly recognized them as U.S. aircraft.
Besides this, there has been no other reaction from China.
U.S. officials say two unarmed U.S. B-52 bombers took off
from the Andersen Air Force Base in Guam, Japan, and flew
through China’s newly designated “Air Defense Identification
Zone" on Nov. 26 at 7pm EST.
They say that the event was a long-planned military exercise
and did not inform the CCP.
Beijing politics watcher Hua Po says
the two U.S. B-52 planes’ flight through China’s
new aerial zone is a warning.
Hua Po, Beijing politics watcher: “Obviously, it’s a signal from
the U.S. to warn China (the CCP) not to take any aggressive
actions, in case of accidental discharge."
On Nov. 23, the CCP unilaterally declared the creation of an
air defense identification zone in the East China Sea, and
required aircraft entering the area to notify Chinese authorities,
or China may adopt a “emergency defensive measures".
The airspace included the Diaoyu Islands controlled by Japan,
South Korea’s Dokdo or Takeshima islands, as well as
the airspace close to the Taiwan Strait and Okinawa.
On Tuesday, U.S. State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki
said there are 70,000 U.S. military personnel stationed in Japan
and South Korea.
She also stressed that China should not set up the Air Defense
Identification Zone and the U.S. would not comply
with the rules for the zone laid out by the CCP.
Xia Ming, political science professor from the City University
of New York, says it would amount to the U.S. handing over
its own strategic space if it complied with the rules of the
CCP’s identification zone.
Xia Ming, political science professor at City University of
New York: “The territory remains disputed, but the CCP wants
to solve it unilaterally and raised its claim on the area as it’s
air defense warning area.
The Air Defense Identification Zone is more like a direct
challenge to South Korea and Japan.
Since Korea and Japan’s ally is the U.S,
it’s also a direct challenge to the U.S.
So the U.S. sent two B-52 bombers to show that
they will not comply with such demands at all.”
So far, the CCP has not protested to against the U.S action.
Hua Po: “CCP officials can’t hype up this issue.
The CCP won’t fight with the U.S. and Japan
because the Diaoyu Islands in East sea is its core interest.
So they’ll adopt a low-key response
to the passthrough of the two U.S. B-52s.”
Xia Ming: “Now we can see U.S. hit the CCP’s bottom line.
First will they protest the U.S. government? And if so,
to what extent? Does it dare send a warning letter to show
whether they’re determined to push forward on the issue?”
According to media reports, the U.S. aircraft carrier battle
group and Japan’s naval fleet arrived in the East China Sea
to carry out exercises on Nov. 27.
On Nov. 26, the CCP’s first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning,
lead its battle group from the North China Sea to the South
via the East China Sea to do some kind of military exercise.
On the 18th, three Chinese navy fleets left the west Pacific
Ocean to hold an Ocean drill codenamed “Mobile No. 5″.
On Nov. 13, while the U.S., South Korea and Japan held
joint military exercises near China’s Yellow Sea, the North Sea
Fleet and the East Sea Fleet of Chinese Navy also launched
large-scale drills in the Yellow Sea with hundreds of warships
and more than 30 warplanes.
What is the intentions of the U.S. and China’s frequent
military exercises?
President of the Macau International Military Institute Huang
Dong said to Hong Kong media that the CCP’s exercises are
certainly against the U.S. military.
He says such large-scale exercises must have an imaginary
enemy, and the U.S. aircraft carriers were no doubt the
protagonist.
Xia Ming says that the CCP wants to expand its strength and
sphere especially in the western Pacific Ocean in recent years.
He says Japan and U.S. military exercises are done to make
the CCP realize that the United States and Japan have
greater aircraft carrier battle group watching beside it.
Xia: “the United States is also reluctant to let China [the CCP]
expand both in the air and at sea .
This is a psychological battle from US and Japan to against
China to show their strength.”
Xia said what the U.S. is doing is to show it’s
determination to Asian allies.
It shows that U.S. not only wants to protect the interests of it’s
allies, but also protect U.S. interests in the Western Pacific.
