【新唐人2013年07月27日讯】在最新一期的美国杂志《标准周刊》当中，美国作家伊森•葛特曼发表了一篇深度报导，讲述在全球举办的所谓“人体展览”中所使用的人体标本来源。文章还揭露了“人体展览”和中共政权活摘法轮功学员器官的深层关系。
葛特曼的文章引述创办大连鸿峰生物技术公司的隋鸿锦一封电子邮件，隋鸿锦在2001年写给他的德国老师哈根斯的信中说：“今天早上，两具新鲜的，高质量的尸体抵达工厂。肝脏仅仅几个小时之前被摘取。”
葛特曼估计有65,000名大陆法轮功学员被秘密置于刀下。文章说，有一部分器官，是为满足老干部的所谓订单。而且，如果囚犯在摘取器官前仍然活着，器官受体排斥的概率会大大下降。
广州高级工程师徐琳：“我相信，我相信他们有做这样的事情。也相信他们做得出这样的事情。因为确确实实在我生活中，有类似这样的事，虽然不是活摘器官这样的事，但是也是很邪恶的一些行为，很残暴的做法。”
葛特曼注意到，在维也纳的“人体世界”展览当中，从某些展出的塑化尸体上，肝脏和肾脏似乎不见了。他猜测，是否这些身体被做了双重用途——器官在塑化之前被摘取？这个猜测得到不少证据的支持。
葛特曼写道，中国重庆市前公安局长王立军，曾在辽宁锦州市成立了一个“锦州市公安局现场心理研究中心”，其实，那是一个“活摘器官中心”。
2006年，王立军和他的研究中心接受了所谓的光华创新特别贡献奖，因为他们在一名死刑犯身上使用了一种毒针，解决了十年来困扰他们的一个问题，也就是：怎样从活人身上摘取器官，而不会激起非自主的肌肉抽搐或损害肾脏或肝脏。
王立军和他指挥的机构实施了几千个密集的现场案例。
辽宁省丹东市机械维修师胡洪春：“天理难容。要是真有这事，天理难容。这不比希特勒还要残暴吗？这个事情，就等着清算那天真相大白吧﹗这个事情也就是在这个国家才可能发生。也没有自由，没有言论自由，没有出版自由，不能揭露真相，全是谎言。”
1999年，哈根斯在一项颁奖典礼上，亲自从时任大连市长的薄熙来手中，接受了颁奖证书和奖牌。根据隋鸿锦说，哈根斯夸耀他跟薄熙来关系密切。
而所谓的“尸体工厂”设立在大连市，跟锦州市相距四个小时的车程。葛特曼写道，塑化业务的盈利巨大，他们没有理由不愿意在锦州摘取完器官之后，再驱车四个小时送到大连。只要尸体在死亡24-48小时内运抵，就可以被塑化。
而从2000年到2001年，大约有50万到100万的法轮功学员被拘禁，这期间，辽宁省进行了大量的秘密手术。
辽宁省抚顺市电子工程师王振民：“这个东西，如果发展成活体上摘除，简直是太残忍了。我不敢相信。这个国家体制该打破，该重建哪。不行了。腐烂到内脏了已经。真不敢相信这事情。我听了非常悲愤。”
辽宁省丹东市的机械维修师胡洪春说，大约三年前，丹东市郊区九连城还发现过很多尸体，有人报案，但是后来却不了了之。他现在回想起来，可能和活摘器官有关。
根据医学专家说，线粒体DNA可以从固化的解剖标本当中提取，并用于证明亲属关系。葛特曼因此建议，如果在中国的家庭中有亲人因为修炼法轮功而失踪，可以向国际机构提供DNA样本，要求跟“人体展览”上的标本进行DNA对比。
葛特曼写道，“人体展览”和“第一展览”可能最终被认为是反人类罪的共犯。通过合作，也许他们可以减轻他们的罪责。
采访编辑/秦雪 后制/孙宁
New Questions Raised on Origins of Plastinated Human Specimens
Ethan Gutmann, renowned UK-based investigative writer
and researcher, raises new questions about the origins of
plastinated human specimens now touring the world.
His article, published in the Weekly Standard, unveils
the deep relationship between the “Bodies“ exhibition and
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) authorities that have
harvested organs from living Falun Gong practitioners in China.
Gutmann quotes an intercepted email from Sui Hongjin to
his teacher Gunther von Hagens, a doctor, at the end of 2001.
Sui set up a plastination factory,
Dalian Hoffen Bio-Technique.
The email says, “This morning, two fresh,
top quality corpses arrived at the factory.
The livers were removed only a few hours ago.”
According to Gutmann´s estimate, 65,000 Falun Gong
practitioners have been secretly killed for organ transplantation.
His article says, “Some, probably a small fraction, of these
organs are harvested to order on behalf of aging cadres.”
“If the prisoner is still alive until the extraction is completed,
this measurably lowers the probability of
rejection by the organ recipient.”
(Senior engineer, Guangzhou) Xu Lin: “I do believe that
they did such a thing, and that they are capable of such.
I´ve actually seen similar occurrences in my daily life.
Although those were not live organ harvesting,
they were nevertheless very evil and very cruel.”
Gutmann mentions that in a traveling show in Vienna,
“the liver and kidneys appear to be missing
from some of the plastinated bodies on display.”
Gutmann questions, “Is it conceivable that these were
dual-use bodies, the organs harvested before plastination?”
A lot of evidence has been found to support this speculation.
“Wang Lijun was head of the police force of Jinzhou
and directed the Jinzhou City Public Security Bureau
On-site Psychological Research Center,” says the article.
In fact, the center was used for live organ harvesting.
In 2006, Wang and his center received the Guanghua
Innovation Special Contribution Award.
It was for his “pioneering the use of a lethal injection that
solved a problem plaguing organ harvesting in China.”
That was, “how to extract organs from living prisoners
without provoking involuntary muscle contractions or
damaging the kidney or the liver.”
In this center, Wang and his agents oversaw
“several thousand intensive on-site cases” of
organ transplantation.
(Maintenance Engineer, Dandong city) Hu Hongchun:
“If it´s true, Heaven will not tolerate it.
Isn´t it more inhumane than what Hitler did?
I just hope for the day when a full exposure of the truth
will bring the perpetrators of this atrocity to justice.
Such a thing can only possibly occur in this country,
where there´s no freedom but lies.”
In 1999, at an Award ceremony, Gunther von Hagens
received an award certificate and medal from Bo Xilai,
the then Dalian mayor.
“According to Sui Hongjin, von Hagens bragged about
his close connection to Bo”, says the article.
The plastination factory was set up in Dalian,
which is four hours’ drive away from Jinzhou city.
Gutmann writes: “Given the extraordinary profit
to be derived from harvesting followed by plastination,
there was little reason not to extract organs in Jinzhou
and then to make the four-hour drive to Dalian.
As long as a cadaver arrived within 24-48 hours of death,
it could be plastinated.”
Gutmann estimates that approximately 500,000 to
1 million Falun Gong practitioners were detained in
2000 and 2001.
He believes that a large number of secret organ transplant
surgeries took place in Liaoning during the same period.
(Electronics Engineer, Fushun city) Wang Zhenmin:
“It´s simply too ruthless if it´s developed into
live organ harvesting, I just can’t believe it’s real.
The country´s political system should be stopped
and be reestablished.
It has been rotten to the core. I just can´t believe
there´s such a thing happening in reality.
I´m really saddened and angry, and shocked on
hearing of it.”
Maintenance engineer, Hu Hongchun,
reveals that about three years ago,
a large number of dead bodies were found
in a suburban area of Dandong city.
Someone reported it to the police,
but the case simply got nowhere in the end.
Recalling this, Hu thinks this might be related to
the news about live organ harvesting.
Gutmann has consulted medical specialists on whether
mitochondrial DNA can be extracted from
fixed anatomical specimens and used to prove kinship.
Gutmann suggests that test samples from a given body
could show up positive or negative against DNA specimens
from Chinese families who have lost a loved one
who was a Falun Gong practitioner,
with whom contact has been lost.
As a result of an “enforced disappearance”.
“Bodies: The Exhibition, and Premier Exhibitions,
could ultimately be considered accessories to a crime
against humanity,” Gutmann concludes in his article.
He thinks that by cooperating, there perhaps might be
Mitigation for their involvement in the crimes.
